Search Immortality Topics:

Page 10«..9101112..2030..»

Home – Anti-Aging Testosterone Treatment Services in Doral …

Posted: October 7, 2019 at 7:44 pm

As part of the normal aging process, our bodys hormonal function slowly declines. Restoring hormonal function naturally using the Rejuvchip procedure is a safe and effective way to reverse aging. The Rejuvchip procedure inserts natural testosterone pellets which are bio-identical, and are made using a botanical source. The testosterone (T) from the pellets enters the body in its natural molecular form and therefore doesnt disrupt normal physiology, as in the case of synthetic hormones. Both men and women who use the Rejuvchip procedure enjoy an array of health benefits. This makes sense, knowing that symptoms and conditions of low T are universal and effect both sexes. Benefits include increased mental and physical energy, improved libido and sexual satisfaction, healthier physique, and a better sense of well being. Women, in addition, also benefit from relief of hot flashes, PMS relief, vaginal rejuvenation, increased bone density, and improved sleep. Research suggests that T pellets may even reduce breast cancer risk. Pellets provide hormonal balance. Conditions of estrogen dominance, such as breast cancer, uterine fibroids, obesity, and fibromyalgia, have all been shown to be improved by T pellets. This is due to helping the body to attain hormonal balance. Furthermore, natural T when delivered in a slow, and steady fashion, mimics the bodys inherent physiology, leading to minimal side effects, and superior results. After appropriate evaluation and informed consent, the Rejuvchip procedure is performed using a local anesthetic, through a 3 mm incision in the hip. The procedure is done in about three minutes and is relatively painless. An adhesive tape is removed in four days. Benefits are enjoyed within two weeks and last for three to four months in women, and five to six months in men. Diet, exercise, and optimal supplementation are all discussed as an important part of this therapy.*

View original post here:
Home - Anti-Aging Testosterone Treatment Services in Doral ...

Recommendation and review posted by G. Smith

Shark Tank’s Newest $4.95 Skin Care Product is a Wrinkle …

Posted: October 7, 2019 at 7:44 pm

During the most watched episode in the history of Shark Tank, two sisters Anna and Samantha Martin convinced the panel of 5 judges to invest millions into the anti-aging skin care company.

Their discover has been called the greatest innovation in skincare history, and it's no surprise the sisters were able to raise a massive amount of capital for their miracle product. The sisters on the other hand were rather shocked by the instant popularity of their wrinkle eraser.

We were shocked. The most we were hoping for was some advicewe werent even sure that we would manage to get any investors, explained Samantha.

After outstanding offers from each panel member, the sisters burst into tears.

It didnt feel real. The fact that all these successful, business-minded people wanted to be apart of what we were doing and willing to invest their own money, it was very emotional! explained Anna.

This skin cream is believed to be such a success that even Hollywood dermatologists were involved in developing the unique recipe. According to our sources, Hollywood doctors heard about Anna and Samantha Martin and their anti-aging product and they put their cream to the test. Since dermatologists liked their anti-aging cream so much, they decided to get involved in order to shed light on it as an alternative to surgery. Some dermatologists have even started recommending it to celebrity clientele.

Now that the sharks were able to help the sisters with their company, this skin cream is now available to women everywhere! We're trying their skin product here to see if you really can look decades younger in just a few minutes.

Afew weeks ago a famous Hollywood doctor decided to announce Shark Tank'santi-aging cream that enraged Botox doctors and dermatologists on his show because of its astounding results. After months of research and various tests,this innovative product was found to take 15-20 years off a woman's appearance in just under 4 weeks! More importantly, it's safe, all-natural, and pain free! This product is called.

HollywoodDermatologists have been careful tokeep this beauty secret for only celebrities and socialitesbut it's finally been exposed!

ow R

So what exactly is it?

Both of these natural substances combinetogether to fade lines, remove wrinkles, and rejuvenate skin tissue at the cellular level beneath the skin. This precise targeting is what sets them apart from the competition.

The first step in the anti-aging formulathatthe doctorsdiscussedwasProprietary Bisophere.

When absorbed by the skin, Proprietary Biosphere filters deepinto damaged skin tissue and releasesfresh collagen a protein that tightens your skin. Beauty advocates are raving about Proprietary Biosphere's effects after a 2016 case study saw a reduction in70% of wrinkles and fine lines for women above the age of 30. Harvard scientists concluded that is exactly why was so effective. It is one of the only products on the market that has a high concentration of PB with the rightconsistency.

QuSome:Famous Hollywood doctors revealed that the second piece of the anti-aging puzzle is QuSome. When QuSome is combined with the correct dosage ofProprietary Bisophere, it thrustsyour new skin cells to the epidermis (the top layer of your skin)allowing your skin to appear up to 20 years younger and gives it thatradiant glowing' look.

Few people know thatQuSome actually binds to moisture. The substance itself can hold up to 1000x its own weight in water, so after you rub the cream in, itnaturally puffs up your skin in those areas that are prone to wrinkles. QuSome repairs these problem zones,' most notably the areas around your eyes and forehead, and regenerates skin that is suffering from dryness or stress. After extensive research, Harvard doctors told the audience that is the only over-the-counter product currently on the market with the proper concentration of QuSome.

Proprietary Bisophere & QuSomework with your natural facial oils to rejuvenate decaying skin, replacing it with new, tighter tissue. This literally turns back the clock on your appearance, erasing away wrinkles and fine lines allowing you to appear 10-20 years younger in a matter of weeks! Research has proven that has the highest concentration and purest forms of PB and QuSome and that's exactly whythe sharksinvested in as their largest deal. I also recommend it to all of my prestigious clientele. Hollywood Dermatologists

This beauty secretwas Hollywood's best kept secret until Jennifer Belew, a 62-year-old mother of fourfrom Orange County, California was featured onThe Talk. Jennifer'stestimonial sent shockwaves through thebeauty industry and she became the poster girl for showing how quick-wits and resourcefulness can save womenthousands of dollars and keep them from getting painful injections or face lifts.

Jennifer barely had enough money to pay for her mortgage, let alone shell out a ton of cash for every anti-aging product claiming its some type ofmiracle serum,' orto visit to anesteemed plastic surgeon.


From the first moment I startedusing , I was really surprised how smooth and softit made my skin feel. It felt like the skinon my face and my pores were being gently pulled by some type vacuum cleaner. My skin felt tighter.

There's no other way to describe it!I could feel a tingling sensation on the areasI used the cream nearmy eyes, my smile lines, and on my forehead. After lookingin the mirror, I could seethat my face looked a little rosy the result of revitalizing blood comingto the surface of myface to renew my skin.

After the skin creamwas completely absorbed into my skin, my face looked a bit firmer and had a radiantglow to it.

DAY 5:

After just five days of usingShark Tank's Skin Care Product, I was amazed. These are some serious results!

The lines near my eyes, dark spots, and wrinkles were visibly reduced in size right before my eyes!

I was shockedby the results and Ihonestlyfelt 15 years younger. It was like watching all of my fine lines and wrinklesdisappearright off my face!


After 14 days with this product, not only had all of my hesitationand skepticism totally vanished SO HAVEMY WRINKLES!

The deep lines on my forehead, thecrows feet, the sagging skin on my neck even the dark age spots on my cheek had COMPLETELY disappeared. I have never felt or usedany anti-aging product that tightened my skin with this kind of resultbefore. Even the expensive products don't yield these results.

After 2 weeks, the skin on my face and neck not only stayed tightened and smooth, it actually seemed to improve dailyuntil my skin became as beautiful and glowingas it was 20 years ago. At this point, my friends and family are completelyshocked. They could not believe the difference in my skin, and they were convinced I had beenlying about not havingbotox!

Using , virtually 98.9% of all her wrinkles were removed and her problem areas were fixed. It tightened the skin on her face and neck, diminishingall signs of aging, dehydrated skin, and sagging.

There are lotsof skin care gimmicks out there, and the majority of them are ridiculously pricey. And with that many options its only natural to be skeptical about these results. So rather thanmaking promises, we simply challenge you to do what Hollywood Dermatologists andShark Tankrecommended to Jennifer Belew:try it for yourself!IMPORTANT:*We have tested both products together, so It is important that you use Step 1 and Step 2 in this method to achieve similar results.


Go here to read the rest:
Shark Tank's Newest $4.95 Skin Care Product is a Wrinkle ...

Recommendation and review posted by G. Smith

Genetic Engineering | Talking Glossary of Genetic Terms …

Posted: October 7, 2019 at 7:43 pm

Genetic engineering is a term that was first introduced into our language in the 1970s to describe the emerging field of recombinant DNA technology and some of the things that were going on. As most people who read textbooks and things know, recombinant DNA technology started with pretty simple things--cloning very small pieces of DNA and growing them in bacteria--and has evolved to an enormous field where whole genomes can be cloned and moved from cell to cell, to cell using variations of techniques that all would come under genetic engineering as a very broad definition. To me, genetic engineering, broadly defined, means that you are taking pieces of DNA and combining them with other pieces of DNA. [This] doesn't really happen in nature, but is something that you engineer in your own laboratory and test tubes. And then taking what you have engineered and propagating that in any number of different organisms that range from bacterial cells to yeast cells, to plants and animals. So while there isn't a precise definition of genetic engineering, I think it more defines an entire field of recombinant DNA technology, genomics, and genetics in the 2000s.

See the article here:
Genetic Engineering | Talking Glossary of Genetic Terms ...

Recommendation and review posted by G. Smith

Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering – HRF

Posted: October 7, 2019 at 7:43 pm

Manipulation of genes in natural organisms, such as plants, animals, and even humans, is considered genetic engineering. This is done using a variety of different techniques like molecular cloning. These processes can cause dramatic changes in the natural makeup and characteristic of the organism. There are benefits and risks associated with genetic engineering, just like most other scientific practices.

Genetic engineering offers benefits such as:

1. Better Flavor, Growth Rate and NutritionCrops like potatoes, soybeans and tomatoes are now sometimes genetically engineered in order to improve size, crop yield, and nutritional values of the plants. These genetically engineered crops also possess the ability to grow in lands that would normally not be suitable for cultivation.

2. Pest-resistant Crops and Extended Shelf LifeEngineered seeds can resist pests and having a better chance at survival in harsh weather. Biotechnology could be in increasing the shelf life of many foods.

3. Genetic Alteration to Supply New FoodsGenetic engineering can also be used in producing completely new substances like proteins or other nutrients in food. This may up the benefits they have for medical uses.

4. Modification of the Human DNAGenes that are responsible for unique and desirable qualities in the human DNA can be exposed and introduced into the genes of another person. This changes the structural elements of a persons DNA. The effects of this are not know.

The following are the issues that genetic engineering can trigger:

1. May Hamper Nutritional ValueGenetic engineering on food also includes the infectivity of genes in root crops. These crops might supersede the natural weeds. These can be dangerous for the natural plants. Unpleasant genetic mutations could result to an increased allergy occurrence of the crop. Some people believe that this science on foods can hamper the nutrients contained by the crops although their appearance and taste were enhanced.

2. May Introduce Risky PathogensHorizontal gene shift could give increase to other pathogens. While it increases the immunity against diseases among the plants, the resistant genes can be transmitted to harmful pathogens.

3. May Result to Genetic ProblemsGene therapy on humans can end to some side effects. While relieving one problem, the treatment may cause the onset of another issue. As a single cell is liable for various characteristics, the cell isolation process will be responsible for one trait will be complicated.

4. Unfavorable to Genetic DiversityGenetic engineering can affect the diversity among the individuals. Cloning might be unfavorable to individualism. Furthermore, such process might not be affordable for poor. Hence, it makes the gene therapy impossible for an average person.

Genetic engineering might work excellently but after all, it is a kind of process that manipulates the natural. This is altering something which has not been created originally by humans. What can you say about this?

Read the original post:
Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering - HRF

Recommendation and review posted by G. Smith

The Case for Cryonics | Cryonics Institute

Posted: October 7, 2019 at 7:42 pm

Insights from Robert Ettinger, "The Father of Cryonics"

In 1962, a physics lecturer at Wayne State University named Robert C. Ettinger founded the cryonics movement with the publication of his book The Prospect of Immortality and introduced the world to a groundbreaking concept he termed "Cryonics."

Ettinger always looked at the concept of cryonics and particularly cryonic revival not as an impossibility, but rather as a complex problem that science would eventually find ways to solve. Considering the current state of technology in 1962, he correctly predicted that science would continue to advance at an explosive rate over the next several decades, ultimately creating the sophisticated tools which would be needed to revive cryonics patients.

Over the course of his first lifetime, Ettinger had the unique pleasure of seeing many of the scientific advances he had predicted decades earlier become reality, further convincing him that the tools and techniques needed to realize his theory were only a matter of time. Ettinger was in the unique position of actually watching his theory coming to life in his own lifetime, and he wrote extensively on the subject of cryonics, clarifying the theory with each new scientific leap forward. Nanotechnology, in particular, has always been a key theoretical revival technique, and Ettinger was fortunate enough to see the first applications of its amazing potential.

Robert Ettinger was placed in cryostasis July 28, 2011 at the Cryonics Institute facility in Michigan at the age of 92. As a scientist, futurist and most of all, "The Original Cryonicist," Robert Ettinger and his works are the foundation and in many ways the soul of the cryonics movement.

To truly understand cryonics, Robert C. Ettinger's works are essential reading.

Resource link to Robert Ettinger's works

Complete list of all documents currently available on the CI web site.

The Prospect of Immortality

Essential reading - the book that launched the cryonics movement in 1962.

Man Into Superman

Ettinger's 1972 follow up to The Prospect of Immortality


A prescient essay discussing the potential of nanotechnology for cryonics applications

Signatories encompass all disciplines relevant to cryonics, including Biology, Cryobiology, Neuroscience, Physical Science, Nanotechnology and Computing, Ethics and Theology.

The signatories, speaking for themselves, include leading scientists from institutes such as MIT, Harvard, NASA and Cambridge University to name a few.

To whom it may concern,

Cryonics is a legitimate science-based endeavor that seeks to preserve human beings, especially the human brain, by the best technology available. Future technologies for resuscitation can be envisioned that involve molecular repair by nanomedicine, highly advanced computation, detailed control of cell growth, and tissue regeneration.

With a view toward these developments, there is a credible possibility that cryonics performed under the best conditions achievable today can preserve sufficient neurological information to permit eventual restoration of a person to full health.

The rights of people who choose cryonics are important, and should be respected.

Sincerely (68 Signatories)

[Signature date in brackets]

Gregory Benford, Ph.D.(Physics, UC San Diego) Professor of Physics; University of California; Irvine, CA [3/24/04]

Alex Bokov, Ph.D.(Physiology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio) [6/02/2014]

Alaxander Bolonkin, Ph.D.(Leningrad Politechnic University) Professor, Moscow Aviation Institute; Senior Research Associate NASA Dryden Flight Research Center; Lecturer, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ [3/24/04]

Nick Bostrom, Ph.D.Research Fellow; University of Oxford; Oxford, United Kingdom [3/25/04]

Kevin Q. Brown, Ph.D.(Computer Science, Carnegie-Mellon) Member of Technical Staff; Lucent Bell Laboratories (retired); Stanhope, NJ [3/23/04]

Professor Manfred Clynes, Ph.D.Lombardi Cancer Center; Department of Oncology and Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Georgetown University; Washington, DC [3/28/04]

L. Stephen Coles, M.D., PhD(RPI, Columbia, Carnegie Mellon University) Director, Supercentenarian Research Foundation Inglewood, California [10/7/06]

Jose Luis Cordeiro, MBA, PhDThe Millennium Project, Venezuelan Director; World Academy of Art and Science, Fellow [02/07/06]

Daniel Crevier, Ph.D.(MIT) President, Ophthalmos Systems Inc., Longueuil, Qc, Canada; Professor of Electrical Engineering (ret.), McGill University & cole de Technologie Suprieure, Montreal, Canada. [4/7/05]

Antonei B. Csoka, Ph.D.Assistant Professor of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh Development Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute [9/14/05]

Aubrey D.N.J. de Grey, Ph.D.Research Associate; University of Cambridge;Cambridge, United Kingdom [3/19/04]

Wesley M. Du Charme, Ph.D.(Experimental Psychology, University of Michigan) author of Becoming Immortal, Rathdrum, Idaho [11/23/05]

Joo Pedro de Magalhes, Ph.D.University of Namur; Namur, Belgium [3/22/04]

Thomas Donaldson, Ph.D.Editor, Periastron; Founder, Institute for Neural Cryobiology; Canberra, Australia [3/22/04]

Christopher J. Dougherty, Ph.D.Chief Scientist; Suspended Animation Inc; Boca Raton, FL [3/19/04]

K. Eric Drexler, Ph.D.Chairman of Foresight Institute; Palo Alto, CA [3/19/04]

Llus Estrada, MD., Ph.D.

Ex Head of the Clinical Neurophysiology Section (retired) at the University Hospital Joan XXIII of Tarragona, Spain. [11/21/2015]

Robert A. Freitas Jr., J.D.Author, Nanomedicine Vols. I & II; Research Fellow, Institute for Molecular Manufacturing, Palo Alto, CA [3/27/04]

Mark Galecki, Ph.D.(Mathematics, Univ of Tennessee), M.S. (Computer Science, Rutgers Univ), Senior System Software Engineer, SBS Technologies [11/23/05]

D. B. Ghare, Ph.D.Principal Research Scientist, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India [5/24/04]

Ben Goertzel, Ph.D.(Mathematics, Temple) Chief Scientific Officer, Biomind LLC; Columbia, MD [3/19/04]

Peter Gouras, M.D.Professor of Ophthalmology, Columbia University; New York City, NY [3/19/04]

Rodolfo G. Goya, PhDSenior Scientist, Institute for Biochemical Research (INIBIOLP), School of Medicine,, National University of La Plata, La Plata city, Argentina. [11/22/2015]

Amara L. Graps, Ph.D.Researcher, Astrophysics; Adjunct Professor of Astronomy; Institute of Physics of the Interplanetary Space; American University of Rome (Italy) [3/22/04]

Raphael Haftka, Ph.D.(UC San Diego) Distinguished Prof. U. of Florida; Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Gainesville, FL [3/22/04]

David A. Hall, M.D.Dean of Education, World Health Medical School [11/23/05]

J. Storrs Hall, Ph.D.Research Fellow, Institute for Molecular Manufacturing, Los Altos, CAFellow, Molecular Engineering Research Institute, Laporte, PA [3/26/04]

Robin Hanson, Ph.D.(Social Science, Caltech) Assistant Professor (of Economics); George Mason University; Fairfax, VA [3/19/04]

Steven B. Harris, M.D.President and Director of Research; Critical Care Research, Inc; Rancho Cucamonga, CA [3/19/04]

Michael D. Hartl, Ph.D.(Physics, Harvard & Caltech) Visitor in Theoretical Astrophysics; California Institute of Technology; Pasadena, CA [3/19/04]

Kenneth J. Hayworth, Ph.D. (Neuroscience, University of Southern California) Research Fellow; Harvard University; Cambridge, MA [10/22/10]

Henry R. Hirsch, Ph. D.(Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1960) Professor Emeritus, University of Kentucky College of Medicine [11/29/05]

Tad Hogg, Ph.D.(Physics, Caltech and Stanford) research staff, HP Labs, Palo Alto, CA [10/10/05]

James J. Hughes, Ph.D.Public Policy Studies Trinity College; Hartford, CT [3/25/04]

James R. Hughes, M.D., Ph.D.ER Director of Meadows Regoinal Medical Center; Director of Medical Research & Development, Hilton Head Longevity Center, Savanah, GA [4/05/04]

Ravin Jain, M.D.(Medicine, Baylor) Assistant Clinical Professor of Neurology, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA [3/31/04]

Subhash C. Kak, Ph.D.Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA [3/24/04]

Professor Bart Kosko, Ph.D.Electrical Engineering Department; University of Southern California [3/19/04]

Jaime Lagnez, PhDNGS and Systems biologist for INSP (National Institutes of Health of Mexico) and CONACYT (National Science and Technology Council). [11/21/2015]

James B. Lewis, Ph.D.(Chemistry, Harvard) Senior Research Investigator (retired); Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute; Seattle, WA [3/19/04]

Marc S. Lewis, Ph.D.Ph.D. from the University of Cincinnati in Clinical Psychology. Associate Professor at the University of Texas at Austin of Clinical Psychology. [6/12/05]

Brad F. Mellon, STM, Ph.D.Chair of the Ethics Committee; Frederick Mennonite Community; Frederick, PA [3/25/04]

Ralph C. Merkle, Ph.D.Distinguished Professor of Computing; Georgia Tech College of Computing; Director, GTISC (GA Tech Information Security Center); VP, Technology Assessment, Foresight Institute [3/19/04]

Marvin Minsky, Ph.D.(Mathematics, Harvard & Princeton) MIT Media Lab and MIT AI Lab; Toshiba Professor of Media Arts and Sciences; Professor of E.E. and C.S., M.I.T [3/19/04]

John Warwick Montgomery, Ph.D.(Chicago) D.Thol. (Strasbourg), LL.D. (Cardiff) Professor Emeritus of Law and Humanities, University of Luton, England [3/28/04]

Max More, Ph.D.Chairman, Extropy Institute, Austin, TX [3/31/04]

Steve Omohundro, Ph.D.(Physics, University of California at Berkeley) Computer science professor at the University of Illinois at Champaign/Urbana [6/08/04]

Mike ONeal, Ph.D.(Computer Science) Assoc. Professor and Computer Science Program Chair; Louisiana Tech Univ.; Ruston, LA [3/19/04]

R. Michael Perry, Ph.D. Computer SciencePatient care and technical services, Alcor Life Extension Foundation [9/30/09]

Yuri Pichugin, Ph.D.Former Senior Researcher, Institute for Problems of Cryobiology and Cryomedicine; Kharkov, Ukraine [3/19/04]

Peter H. Proctor, M.D., Ph.D.Independent Physician & Pharmacologist; Houston, Texas [5/02/04]

Martine Rothblatt, Ph.D., J.D., M.B.A.Responsible for launching several satellite communications companies including Sirius and WorldSpace. Founder and CEO of United Therapeutics. [5/02/04]

Klaus H. Sames, M.D.University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Center of Experimental Medicine (CEM) Institute of Anatomy II: Experimental Morphology; Hamburg, Germany [3/25/04]

Anders Sandberg, Ph.D.(Computational Neuroscience) Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm University; Stockholm, Sweden [3/19/04]

Sergey V. Sheleg, M.D., Ph.D.Senior Research Scientist, Alcor Life Extension Foundation; Scottsdale, AZ [8/11/05]

Stanley Shostak, Ph.D.Associate Professor of Biological Sciences; University of Pittsburgh; Pittsburgh, PA [3/19/04]

Rafal Smigrodzki, M.D., Ph.D.Chief Clinical Officer, Gencia Company; Charlottesville VA [3/19/04]

David S. Stodolsky, Ph.D.(Univ. of Cal., Irvine) Senior Scientist, Institute for Social Informatics [11/24/05]

Gregory Stock, Ph.D.Director, Program on Medicine, Technology, and Society UCLA School of Public Health; Los Angeles, CA [3/24/04]

Charles Tandy, Ph.D.Associate Professor of Humanities and Director Center for Interdisciplinary Philosophic Studies Fooyin University (Kaohsiung, Taiwan) [5/25/05]

Peter Toma, Ph.D.President, Cosmolingua, Inc. Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Inventor and Founder of SYSTRAN. Director of International Relations, Alcor Life Extension Foundation. Residences in Argentina, Germany, New Zealand, Switzerland and USA [5/24/05]

Natasha Vita-More, PhDProfessor, University of Advancing Technology, Tempe, Arizona, USA. [11/22/2015]

Mark A. Voelker, Ph.D.(Optical Sciences, U. Arizona) Director of Bioengineering; BioTime, Inc.; Berkeley, CA [3/19/04]

Roy L. Walford, M.D.Professor of Pathology, emeritus; UCLA School of Medicine; Los Angeles, CA [3/19/04]

Mark Walker, Ph.D.Research Associate, Philosophy; Trinity College; University of Toronto (Canada) [3/19/04]

Michael D. West, Ph.D.President, Chairman & Chief Executive Office; Advanced Cell Technology, Inc.; Worcester, MA [3/19/04]

Ronald F. White, Ph.D.Professor of Philosophy; College of Mount St. Joseph; Cincinnati, OH [3/19/04]

James Wilsdon, Ph.D.(Oxford University) Head of Strategy for Demos, an independent think-tank; London, England [5/04/04]

Brian Wowk, Ph.D.Senior Scientist 21st Century Medicine, Inc.; Rancho Cucamonga, CA [3/19/04]

Selected Journal Articles Supporting Cryonics:

First paper showing recovery of brain electrical activity after freezing to -20C. Suda I, Kito K, Adachi C, in: Nature (1966, vol. 212), Viability of long term frozen cat brain in vitro, pg. 268-270.

The Case for Cryonics | Cryonics Institute

Recommendation and review posted by G. Smith

A Dying Young Womans Hope in Cryonics and a Future

Posted: October 7, 2019 at 7:42 pm

So Dr. Hayworth urged Dr. Fahy to find some way for his work to be better validated. We have to be able to see it to believe it, he said.

In fact, there was one way Dr. Fahy had considered. He could fix the brains structure in place with chemicals first, just as Dr. Mikula was doing, buying time to perfuse the cryoprotectant more slowly to avoid dehydration. But he lacked the funds, he said, for a project that would have no practical business application for organ banking. Also, his companys focus is on what he calls reversible cryopreservation, whereas fixing the brains structure in place with chemicals, as is done in chemopreservation, would place biological revival, the goal of many Alcor members, even farther out of reach.

Kims talk was well-received. Josh, watching from the audience, felt warmed by the applause that broke out several times during her short presentation. Yet he noticed her losing her train of thought more than once.

In early November, Kim assigned her power of attorney to Josh. She understood, Josh later realized, better than he had, how little time she had left.

I know that, Mom and Dad, you probably would respect my last wishes, she said to her phone camera. But Josh knows me best.

Josh, who one year granted Kims birthday wish to dress her, now dressed her every day.

They had decided that Kim would die in the hospice Alcor had suggested near its headquarters in Scottsdale, one that would allow the cryonics team to be on hand with all its equipment so the preservation procedure could begin immediately. And after a sharp exchange, in which her father threatened to take Kim home with him to Florida, Mr. Suozzi backed down.

Josh and I have only one thing in common, Mr. Suozzi said with a certain reluctant admiration. And that is our love for Kim.

See original here:
A Dying Young Womans Hope in Cryonics and a Future

Recommendation and review posted by G. Smith

Page 10«..9101112..2030..»