Search Results for: 21 full movie online free hd

21 and Over 2012 Entire Movie Online Part 1/12 – Video


21 and Over 2012 Entire Movie Online Part 1/12
watch the FULL movie at tiny.cc Studio: Relativity Media Director: Jon Lucas, Scott Moore Screenwriter: Jon Lucas, Scott Moore Starring: Miles Teller, Justin Chon, Skylar Astin, Sarah Wright, François Chau, Jonathan Keltz, Daniel Booko, Dustin Ybarra Genre: Comedy Plot Summary: Skylar Astin ("Pitch Perfect"), Miles Teller ("Footloose") and Justin Chon ("Twilight") star in "21 and Over," a hilarious movie that showcases a rite of passage gone horribly wrong. Straight-A college student Jeff Chang has always done what #39;s expected of him. But when his two best friends Casey and Miller surprise him with a visit for his 21st birthday, he decides to do the unexpected for a change, even though his critical medical school interview is early the next morning. What was supposed to be one beer becomes one night of chaos, over indulgence and utter debauchery in this outrageous comedy. Miles Teller, Justin Chon, Skylar Astin, Sarah Wright,21 and over, uncut, Free, movie, Film, Full, Complete, Leaked, Part 1, Part 2, Part, Stream, Hd, Trailer, Exclusive, Scenes, Download, 2012, Watch Online, Red Band, watch, stream, Where can I see, Releases, Showtimes, videoFrom:BelvinarCamerodinViews:0 0ratingsTime:09:01More inFilm Animation

Read the rest here:
21 and Over 2012 Entire Movie Online Part 1/12 - Video

Posted in Medical School | Comments Off on 21 and Over 2012 Entire Movie Online Part 1/12 – Video

Structure and noncanonical Cdk8 activation mechanism within an Argonaute-containing Mediator kinase module – Science Advances

Abstract

The Cdk8 kinase module (CKM) in Mediator, comprising Med13, Med12, CycC, and Cdk8, regulates RNA polymerase II transcription through kinase-dependent and -independent functions. Numerous pathogenic mutations causative for neurodevelopmental disorders and cancer congregate in CKM subunits. However, the structure of the intact CKM and the mechanism by which Cdk8 is non-canonically activated and functionally affected by oncogenic CKM alterations are poorly understood. Here, we report a cryoelectron microscopy structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CKM that redefines prior CKM structural models and explains the mechanism of Med12-dependent Cdk8 activation. Med12 interacts extensively with CycC and activates Cdk8 by stabilizing its activation (T-)loop through conserved Med12 residues recurrently mutated in human tumors. Unexpectedly, Med13 has a characteristic Argonaute-like bi-lobal architecture. These findings not only provide a structural basis for understanding CKM function and pathological dysfunction, but also further impute a previously unknown regulatory mechanism of Mediator in transcriptional modulation through its Med13 Argonaute-like features.

In eukaryotes, Mediator is a large, evolutionarily conserved, and multisubunit (25 to 30 proteins) transcriptional coactivator complex that conveys regulatory signals from activators and repressors to the RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) transcription machinery (1, 2). Structurally, Mediator proteins are assembled separately into a Core Mediator (~1 MDa) and a dissociable subcomplex (~0.5 MDa), called Cdk8 kinase module (CKM) (36). Biochemically, Core Mediator is able to interact with the RNAPII machinery and initiate transcription (7, 8), while the CKM can reversibly associate with Core Mediator to preclude RNAPII binding (5, 6, 9, 10). The CKM was initially considered to play a repressive role in gene expression, but recent studies have shown its roles in both context-specific activation and repression of transcription (11, 12).

The CKM, first identified in yeast, consists of Cdk8, CycC, Med12, and Med13 subunits (Fig. 1A) (13). The CycC-dependent CDK8 kinase, a colorectal cancer oncoprotein in humans (14), belongs to a transcriptional CDK subbranch and phosphorylates the C-terminal domain (CTD) of RNAPII Rpb1 and many transcription-associated proteins, including Transcription Factor II H (TFIIH) (1518). Notably, CDK8 lacks a canonical phosphorylation residue within its activation segment (T-loop), and this fact, coupled with its incorporation into the large CKM complex essential for kinase activity, renders CDK8 distinct among CDK family proteins with an apparent unique and heretofore obscure activation mechanism. Human MED12, required for CDK8/CDK19 kinase activity (6, 1921), has been found to associate with transcriptional activators/coactivators, the REST corepressor G9a, and certain activating noncoding RNAs (2226). However, the molecular mechanism by which MED12 activates CycC-dependent CDK8/19 remains unclear. Med13, the largest subunit in Mediator, enables association of the CKM with Core Mediator (5, 6). On the basis of sequence alignment, Med13 was predicted to be a member of the PIWI protein family because of the presence of an apparent PIWI module that contains MID and PIWI [ribonuclease H (RNase H)like] domain (27). The PIWI module represents a functional unit within the Argonaute (Ago)/PIWI superfamily of proteins that play crucial roles in transcriptional and posttranscriptional gene silencing (28). Ago proteins are further characterized by the presence of N, L1, L2, and PAZ domains, the latter of which contributes to binding of small interfering RNA/microRNA (29, 30), but the previous alignment analysis identified no such domains in Med13 (27). Therefore, obtaining structural information of Med13 is essential to understand its functional role in Mediator-dependent transcription regulation.

(A) Schematic diagram of CKM subunits. The functional domains are indicated. KA, kinase activation domain. (B) SDS-PAGE analysis of purified WT CKM and Cdk8/CycC (from a Med12/Med13/CycC-TAPtagged yeast strain). The identities of bands corresponding to Cdk8 and CycC were confirmed by MS. CBP, Calmodulin Binding Protein. (C) Kinase activity of purified CKM and Cdk8/CycC directed toward the Ser5 residue of the RNAPII CTD (GST-CTD-6xHis). WB, Western blotting. (D) Left: Cryo-EM map of Kinase- and Central-lobes at 3.8- resolution. Right: Cryo-EM map of the H-lobe at 4.9- resolution. (Cdk8 in blue, CycC in cyan, Med13 in green, and Med12 in orange). (E) Two helices of Med12 and Med13 subunits with their corresponding electron densities. (F) Overall structure of the CKM. The Kinase-, Central-, and H-lobes are as indicated. (G) Cross-linking map of the CKM. In total, 80 intrasubunit and 29 intersubunit cross-links identified between lysine residues present in the CKM atomic model are shown by red and blue lines, respectively. The protein regions belonging to the Kinase-, Central-, or H-lobes are as indicated.

Dysfunction or dysregulation of human CKM has been linked with both germline and somatic developmental and age-associated diseases. For example, mutations in MED12 are causative for several X-linked intellectual disability disorders including Opitz-Kaveggia (FG), Lujan-Fryns (Lujan), and Ohdo syndromes, and MED12 is also recurrently mutated at high frequency in uterine leiomyomas (ULs) and breast fibroadenomas, as well as prostate and other cancers (3135). These findings suggest that delineation of the CKM structure, including resolution of its constituent subunit interactions and mechanism of CDK8 activation therein, will be essential to fully understand the function and dysfunction of Mediator-dependent transcription in development and disease. Although some structural information of human and yeast CKMs were obtained by electron microscopy (EM) and x-ray crystallography (5, 6, 9, 3638), detailed molecular insight into the entire CKM structure, subunit interactions, and mechanism of CDK8 kinase activation are heretofore still lacking.

Here, we report a cryo-EM structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CKM complex that redefines prior human and yeast CKM subunit organizational models. The structure, combined with cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) and biochemical analyses, provides a structural basis for large Med12 and Med13 subunits and reveals critical contacts between Med12 and Cdk8/CycC essential for kinase activity. The Med12 subunit functions as a scaffold within the CKM, and its unique structure provides great potential for interactions with regulators. The N-terminal region of Med12 stimulates Cdk8 kinase activity by a noncanonical mechanism that involves contacts with both the T-loop and RHYT segment of the kinase. Mapping human UL-linked MED12 driver mutations onto the CKM structure revealed a cluster in the vicinity of the kinase T-loop/RHYT segment, and functional analyses confirmed that these mutations disrupt CDK8 kinase activity. Notably, molecular dynamics simulations suggest a model for mutation-induced disruption of Cdk8 kinase activity through reconfiguration of the T-loop into a nonactivated conformation. Unexpectedly, we found that Med13 not only has MID and PIWI domains, as previously predicted, but also harbors N, L1, L2, and PAZ domains that collectively conform to an Ago structure. Notably, the L2 domain of Med13 adopts a unique structure that mimics Ago-bound RNA to occupy the central channel, resulting in an autoinhibited state. Last, we show that the CKM binding region on Core Mediator is likely to overlap with those of both RNAPII and TFIIH, revealing steric hindrance as the basis by which the CKM precludes the interaction of Mediator with the transcription preinitiation complex (PIC). Together, our findings markedly redefine the central architecture of the Mediator kinase module, confirm the interface between CDK8/CycC and MED12 as a potential therapeutic target for Mediator-associated Cdk8-driven diseases, and shed new light on the regulatory potential of Mediator in transcriptional modulation mediated by its Med13 Ago-like features.

Wild-type (WT) yeast CKM for structure determination was purified from S. cerevisiae through a tandem affinity purification (TAP)tagged CycC subunit and thereafter polished by ion exchange chromatography (table S1). Purified CKM subunit composition and kinase activity were determined by SDSpolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and phosphorylation assay against the RNAPII CTD, respectively (Fig. 1, B and C). To compare the activity of Cdk8/CycC with and without Med12/Med13, we also purified endogenous yeast Cdk8/CycC from Med12/Med13 deletion strains. WT CKM kinase activity was substantially higher than that of Cdk8/CycC alone, suggesting that Cdk8/CycC activity was stimulated in the presence of Med12 and Med13 (Fig. 1C).

CKM cryo-EM specimens were prepared on holey carbon grids and imaged on a 300-kV Titan Krios (FEI) microscope equipped with a K2 Summit (Gatan) direct electron detector (fig. S1A and table S2). Two-dimensional (2D) class averages showed various orientations of the CKM that was preserved in ice (fig. S1B). Although the CKM in some averages appear to be symmetric, two distal ends of the CKM are composed of different subunits. Analysis of the CKM images resulted in an overall 4.4- cryo-EM map (fig. S1C). A local resolution map showed that the highest-resolution portions of the map were the Kinase- and Central-lobes, whereas some mobility resulted in blurring of the H-lobe map near the distal end (fig. S1C). Image processing that focused on the Kinase- and Central-lobes was able to produce a final 3.8--resolution density map (Fig. 1D, left, and fig. S1D). For the H-lobe of the CKM near the distal terminus, local refinement was able to improve the map quality to 4.9 , in which secondary structure elements could be resolved and the main chain could be traced (Fig. 1D, right, and fig. S1E). We performed model building for Cdk8/CycC starting from the crystal structure of human Cdk8/CycC complex (38) and built Med12 and Med13 models ab initio on the basis of cryo-EM maps and secondary structure prediction results (Fig. 1, E and F; fig. S2; and table S2).

In the elongated CKM structure, two bent features, corresponding to the Kinase- and H-lobes, protrude from the Central-lobe (Fig. 1F and movie S1). In the Kinase-lobe, the Cdk8 subunit is connected to the Central-lobe through CycC and a portion of Med12, which is consistent with previous structural studies (5, 36). Unexpectedly, however, we found that the H-lobe of the CKM is composed only of Med12, whereas Med13 and a portion of Med12 together constitute the Central-lobe (Fig. 1F). Notably, the relative position of Med13 and Med12 in our high-resolution structure of the CKM is reversed compared to previously published EM studies (5, 6, 36), in which Med13 was instead localized to the distal terminus of the CKM. It is likely that conformational flexibility caused by the deletion of Med13 in prior low-resolution EM studies led to inaccurate interpretation of the subunit organization.

To strengthen our structural findings, we performed XL-MS analysis on the purified CKM (fig. S3, A and B, and data S1). The identified cross-links were selected on the basis of the presence of corresponding lysine residues in our atomic model and then mapped onto the CKM structure (Fig. 1G). Except for those regions missing in the corresponding density map, the organization and interactions among subunits revealed by the CKM atomic model agree with cross-links detected by XL-MS analysis (fig. S3, C to G). Consistent with our CKM structure, several cross-links identified between CycC and Med13 occur at their interface, thus revealing CycC to be positioned next to Med13 in the Central-lobe (fig. S3D). The XL-MS results that support the CKM structure are discussed separately in the following sections. Because of sequence homologies within orthologous subunits and similarities in the CKM overall shape revealed by EM, we suggest that the subunit organization of yeast CKM redefined by our high-resolution structure and XL-MS analysis can be applied to those of higher eukaryotic CKMs.

The elongated conformation of Med12 spans the entire CKM and comprises two extended N- and C-terminal segments (Med12N and Med12C, respectively), connected by a large horseshoe-shaped solenoid structure (Med12HEAT) that is mainly composed of -helical elements (Fig. 2, A and B, and fig. S4A). Med12N (residues 1 to 105) starts as an extended polypeptide with two helices (H1 and H2) that wrap around the Kinase-lobe of the CKM (orange in Fig. 2C) and makes extensive contacts with both the Cdk8 and CycC subunits (described below). This agrees with XL-MS results showing that H2 of Med12 (K88 and K91) cross-linked with CycC (K262) and Med13 (K1114) at their respective interfaces (fig. S3D). Consistent with prior biochemical findings for the human CKM (19, 20), we found that the yeast Med12 N-terminal region (residues 1 to 105) could associate with Cdk8/CycC and stimulate its kinase activity (Fig. 2, D and E), confirming an important role for the Med12 N-terminal region in kinase activation. Med12HEAT (residues 106 to 1343), encompassing the majority of Med12, comprises five HEAT domains, each of which consists of 9 to 14 helices (Fig. 2B and fig. S4B). The first domain (HEAT 1) of Med12HEAT lies adjacent to Med13 in the best-resolved portion of the cryo-EM map, and we were able to assign protein residues for this domain in the atomic model (Fig. 2C and fig. S2B). The remaining four domains (HEAT 2 to HEAT 5) of Med12HEAT, which form the H-lobe, are tightly packed at one end of the CKM (Fig. 1F and fig. S2C). Despite decreased resolution (4.9 ) in this region caused by some mobility, the main-chain trajectory of the H-lobe revealed by our model agreed with cross-links detected by the XL-MS analysis of the CKM (fig. S3E).

(A) Structural organization of Med12. The first and second helices (orange ribbon) in Med12N are labeled as H1 and H2, respectively. Five HEAT domains (Med12HEAT) are shown in transparent surface. (B) Domain organization of Med12. The N- and C-terminal regions of Med12 (Med12N and Med12C) that form interactions with Cdk8/CycC and Med13, respectively, are indicated. Colors are as in (A). (C) Interactions of Med12 with Cdk8, CycC, and Med13. Cdk8, CycC, and Med13 are shown in colored surface representations. (D) The Med12 N-terminal region (residues 1 to 105) associates with Cdk8/CycC. GST-Med12 fragments in Escherichia coli lysates as indicated were immobilized on glutathione Sepharose beads and incubated with yeast cell lysate (CycC-TAP/Med12/Med13) containing Cdk8/CycC. (E) Kinase activity of yeast Cdk8/CycC stimulated by GST-Med12-(1105). Phosphorylation of GST-CTD-6xHis was detected by the antibody that recognizes phosphorylated Ser5 of CTD. For GST-Med12-(1105), 250 ng (+) or 1 g (++) of protein was used in the reactions. (F) Immunoprecipitation (IP) assay. Deletion of the C-terminal region (residues 1346 to 1427) of Med12 caused loss of Med13 from CKM.

In the CKM structure, we found that Med12C (residues 1344 to 1427; green in Fig. 2C) adopts an extended conformation that runs along the Med13 surface, overlaps with a linker region that connects Med12N to HEAT 1, and ultimately contacts CycC by its C terminus near the interface between Med13 and CycC (Fig. 2C and fig. S4, C to E). Consistent with the localization of the Med12 C terminus, XL-MS analysis revealed cross-links between K1392 and K1424 of Med12 and some Lys residues of Med13 around the interface between Med13 and CycC (fig. S3F). In addition, the extensive interactions between Med13 and Med12C described here are consistent with our biochemical observation that Med13 is lost from a Med12C CKM derivative (Fig. 2F). Moreover, the C-terminal region of human MED12, including both PQL and OPA domains, has been reported to interact with Med13 (20). Together, these results reveal that Med12 functions as a scaffold that connects Cdk8, CycC, and Med13, and its elongated conformation could further provide a large surface area for interactions with transcriptional regulators.

Structural studies of CDK2/CycA established the general principle of kinase activation for the CDK family proteins (39). Activation occurs through the binding of the Cyclin to the CDK followed by phosphorylation of a conserved residue in the T-loop of the CDK. The phosphorylated T-loop is extended to form a platform, which relieves a blockade to the catalytic site present in free CDK, leading to fully activated kinase. Notably, among all human CDK proteins, CDK8 (and its close paralog CDK19) uniquely lacks a canonical phosphorylation residue in the T-loop, suggesting an activation mechanism distinct from the other classical CDK proteins.

Within the CKM, the structure of yeast Cdk8 reveals a bilobed architecture (N- and C-lobes) with a peptide substratebinding site located between the two lobes (Fig. 3A and fig. S5A, left). CycC consists of two classical cyclin-box fold domains, N-CBF and C-CBF. The N-CBF in CycC is bound by the N-lobe of Cdk8, including an N-terminal helix (1) present in Cdk8 that provides specificity for CycC recognition. A conserved groove (yellow in fig. S5A) unique to CycC (among all Cyclin family proteins) lies near the T-loop of Cdk8. The overall structures of yeast and human Cdk8/CycC are generally similar (fig. S5, A and B) (38). Compared to the human CDK8/CycC structure, the 1 of Cdk8 and the C-terminal helix of CycC in yeast adopt slightly different orientations due to an additional sheet (S1 and S2) in the latter formed by an insertion of ~30 amino acids between H2 and H3 (fig. S5C). All T-loops in the structures of human CDK8/CycC alone, determined in the absence of MED12/MED13, are mostly disordered (fig. S5D), suggesting that these structures exhibit only partially active conformations. By contrast, the T-loop of yeast Cdk8 within the CKM is well defined in the electron density map (fig. S5A, right). Furthermore, when compared to the structure of human phosphorylated (activated) CDK2 (40), yeast Cdk8 with the CKM shares notable structural similarities in its peptide substratebinding site. First, four highly conserved residues in yeast Cdk8 important for coordinating the T-loop in an activated conformation, including R206 (N-lobe), R285 (C-lobe), R309 (T-loop), and Y342 (RHYT segment), all adopt similar side-chain orientations as observed in the phosphorylated CDK2 (fig. S5E, left). Similarly, the side chain of Y342 forms a hydrogen bond with the side chain of R285 in Cdk8. Second, the VVT motif (V325-V326-T327) of CKM Cdk8 reveals a push-in conformation, similar to that of phosphorylated Cdk2, resulting in a potential substrate-binding site. Third, residues 304 to 306 next to the adenosine triphosphate (ATP)binding site, at the start of the T-loop in CKM Cdk8, adopts a DLG-in (DMG motif in human CDK8) conformation crucial for kinase activity, which is similar to that of phosphorylated CDK2 (fig. S5E, left bottom). Together, these observations suggest that the T-loop of Cdk8 within the CKM is poised in an activated conformation. Because Med12 physically interacts and functionally stimulates CycC/Cdk8 within the CKM, we examined whether and how Med12 contributes to stabilization of the Cdk8 T-loop.

(A) Structure of Cdk8/CycC contacted by Med12N (orange) and a linker region of Med13 (green). The T-loop of Cdk8 is colored in red and highlighted by the red surface. The highly conserved groove within the CycC family proteins is indicated. (B) Contacts between Med12N and the highly conserved groove in CycC. The residues in CycC involved in Med12 binding are indicated. The highly conserved residues are colored in yellow. (C) Detailed view of the interface between Cdk8 (light blue) and Med12 H1 (orange). The RHYT segment is colored in green. (D) The residues following Med12 H1 involved in interactions with the T-loop and 6-7 loop (RHYT segment) of Cdk8 are indicated by orange circles. Three conserved arginine (R206, R285, and R309) and one tyrosine (Y342) residues in Cdk8 important for coordinating an active T-loop conformation are shown. (E) Surface representation of Cdk8/CycC/Med12N showing positions of mutations. (F) Pull-down analysis for interaction of WT or mutant Cdk8/CycC with GST-Med12N-(1105).

The N-terminal region of Med12 (Med12N) adopts an extended conformation that encircles the C-CBF of CycC and contacts the C-lobe of Cdk8, resulting in a total interaction area of ~3800 2 (Fig. 3A, fig. S2D, and movie S2). We divided the overall interface between Med12N and CycC into three regions. In the first, the N-terminal coil region (I, residues 11 to 35) before H1 in Med12 contacts the C-CBF near Cdk8 and the N terminus of CycC (Fig. 3A and fig. S4F). Trp6, highly conserved in the CycC family, is buried almost completely between hydrophobic residues in this area (fig. S4G). The second interface involves a coil region (II, residues 59 to 73) followed by H2 within Med12 and the conserved surface groove on CycC that is formed between its two CBFs (Fig. 3B), including five residues (R92, Q93, W209, D214, and Y297) that are invariantly conserved among CycC, but not other Cyclin family proteins. These interactions are likely responsible for the specificity of CycC for Med12. The third interface (III) corresponds to a composite binding region involving the C-CBF of CycC and both H2 of Med12 and a linker region from Med13 (Fig. 3A and fig. S4H). Med13 contacts in this area could stabilize the interaction between Med12 and CycC, which may explain our previous biochemical observation that the presence of human MED13 could suppress dissociation of oncogenic MED12 mutant derivatives from Cdk8/CycC (20).

Regarding the interface between Med12 and Cdk8, the N-terminal portion of Med12 (residues 35 to 56) folds on the C-lobe of Cdk8 where it makes numerous interactions, primarily with the T-loop and the 6-7 loop (RHYT segment) of Cdk8 (Fig. 3A). The residue W36 of Med12, together with residues W281, L283, and P344 of Cdk8, forms a hydrophobic core that buries residue F311 of the T-loop (Fig. 3C). Med12 residues E42 and L46 within H1 (residues 40 to 49) along with Med12 residues A51, K52, and G53 contact the RHYT segment. Notably, residues 54 to 56, following H1 of Med12, form some contacts with the tip of the T-loop (Fig. 3D). This interaction mode is reminiscent of the unphosphorylated CDK6/Vcyclin complex, in which the N terminus of Vcyclin forms a short sheet with the CDK6 T-loop to activate the kinase (fig. S5F) (41).

To confirm the interaction mode between Med12N and Cdk8/CycC revealed by structural analysis, we assessed the impact of both interfacial and noninterfacial mutations in CycC and Cdk8 on Med12 binding using immobilized protein affinity chromatography (Fig. 3, E and F). Compared to WT Cdk8/CycC, mutant derivatives S210E or F235E in CycC or I449E in Cdk8, all of which alter residues that interface with Med12N, were severely compromised in their respective abilities to bind Med12N. As expected, mutant derivatives A251R in CycC and D410R in Cdk8 that are not involved in Med12 interaction exhibited no reduction in Med12N binding.

Intriguingly, our structural analysis revealed that within the CKM, the Cdk8 T-loop is nonetheless configured into an activated conformation despite the fact that it lacks a canonical phosphorylation residue (fig. S5E, left). Since Med12N contacts both the T-loop and RHYT segment of Cdk8 and is important for kinase activity, we speculated that Med12 H1 supersedes the requirement for T-loop phosphorylation by configuring the T-loop into an activated conformation. To investigate this possibility, we assessed the structural features of the Cdk8 RHYT and T-loop segments in the presence and absence of Med12. Notably, because the RHYT segment, similar to the T-loop, is conserved and present in both yeast and human Cdk8 proteins, we therefore compared the structure of yeast Cdk8 (bound by Med12 within the CKM) to that of human CDK8 (absent MED12).

In our CKM structure, the Cdk8 RHYT segment, bound by MED12 residues E42, L46, A51, K52, and G53, adopts a conformation that makes several contacts with the T-loop (Fig. 4A). Thus, Cdk8 residues R340 and Y342 from the RHYT segment contact residues Y319 (as well as residue T317) and L318, respectively, within the T-loop. Notably, the side chain of Y342 interacts with R285 (C-lobe), one of three highly conserved arginine residues in CDK family proteins important for coordinating the T-loop in an activated conformation (Fig. 4A and fig. S5E, left). By contrast, in human CDK8 structures (absent MED12), the RHYT segment adopts a different conformation and is instead positioned such that it could potentially overlap with the T-loop (Fig. 4B and fig. S5E, middle). In this regard, the side chain of Y211 (Y342 in yeast Cdk8) does not engage in hydrogen bonding with R150 (R285 in yeast Cdk8) but instead points to the VVT motif. In addition, residue H210 (H341 in yeast Cdk8) is positioned such that it likely impinges on the T-loop. These factors might cause steric hindrance and T-loop destabilization. This could explain why all T-loops in the structures of human CDK8/CycC (determined in the absence of MED12/MED13) are mostly disordered (fig. S5D). To determine whether Med12 H1 is important for kinase activation, we engineered mutations in RHYT-interacting (E42A and L46R) or RHYT-noninteracting (I45R) residues (Fig. 4A) and assessed their impact on the ability of MED12N to bind and activate Cdk8/CycC. Compared to WT Med12N, mutant derivatives E42A and L46R exhibited no apparent differences in Cdk8/CycC binding activity (Fig. 4C) but markedly reduced Cdk8/CycC kinase activity (Fig. 4D). As expected, mutant derivative I45R exhibited no reduction, compared to WT Med12N, in Cdk8/CycC binding and kinase stimulatory activities (Fig. 4, C and D), as our structure revealed that I45 is not involved in RHYT binding. On the basis of these collective observations, we hypothesize that Med12 binding can elicit structural rearrangement of the Cdk8 RHYT segment, which, in turn, triggers stabilization of the T-loop into an active conformation.

(A) H1 of Med12 bound to yeast Cdk8. (B) Superimposition of yeast and human Cdk8 [Protein Data Bank (PDB ID): 3RGF] structures showing conformational differences of the RHYT segments. (C) Pull-down analysis for interactions between Cdk8/CycC and GST-Med12-(1105). (D) Effects of WT or mutant GST-Med12-(1105) on kinase activity of Cdk8/CycC. (E and F) RMSD plots of the T-loop and RHYT segment regions during molecular dynamics simulations. (G) Left: Superimposition of simulated models showing effects of Med12N binding on the T-loop and the RHYT segment regions of Cdk8. Cdk8 models simulated in the absence or presence of Med12N are colored in green or purple, respectively. Right: Superimposition of simulated models showing effects of mutant Med12N on the T-loop and the RHYT segment regions of Cdk8. (H) Sequence alignment of the N-terminal region of Med12. The identical and similar residues are highlighted by red and yellow, respectively. Three UL hotspot mutations of human MED12 (L36, Q43, and G44) are indicated by red dots. (I) Zoomed-in view of UL-linked MED12 driver mutations near Cdk8/CycC. The portion (residues 27 to 51) of human MED12 carrying recurrent UL-causing mutations is highlighted in red. The T-loop and RHYT segment of Cdk8 are shown in pink and green surfaces, respectively. Three human UL hotspot mutations are indicated by red dots. (J) Structure of Cdk8/CycC/Med12N. The mutations on Med12 are as indicated. (K) Pull-down analysis for interactions between WT and mutants of GST-Med12-(1105). (L) Effects of WT and mutant derivatives of GST-Med12-(1105) on kinase activity of Cdk8/CycC analyzed by Western blot.

To further investigate whether Med12N contributes to stabilization of the Cdk8 T-loop, we performed molecular dynamics simulations to assess flexibilities of the T-loop (residues 304 to 327) and RHYT segment (residues 339 to 344) using models for Cdk8/CycC or Cdk8/CycC/Med12N (residues 1 to 105) obtained from our CKM structure. We calculated the root mean square deviation (RMSD) values for small regions of interest to measure protein conformational stability over the course of their trajectories. Compared with Cdk8 bound by Med12N, we found that the T-loop of Cdk8/CycC alone exhibits higher averaged RMSD, indicating more flexibility in this region when Med12 is absent (Fig. 4E). Similarly, the RMSD of the RHYT region from Cdk8/CycC alone also becomes slightly higher overall and fluctuates more, reflecting the more transient nature of RHYT region to T-loop contacts when Med12N is not present to stabilize the RHYT segment (Fig. 4F). Notably, on the basis of the analysis of the root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) per residue, amino acids A339, R340, and H341 of the RHYT region, as well as Y319 of the T-loop, in Cdk8/CycC show higher RMSF, indicating greater flexibility during the molecular dynamics simulation when Med12N is not bound (fig. S6, A and B). In the absence of Med12N, the close interaction of Cdk8 residues Y319 (T-loop) and R340 (RHYT segment) is lost, and a region (residues 310 to 314) in the T-loop around F311, which is buried by a hydrophobic core formed in the presence of Med12, shows large structural changes (Fig. 4G, left, and fig. S6A). On the basis of these results, we believe that Med12, including H1 and its following residues (residues 51 to 53), contributes to the stabilization of the Cdk8 T-loop through contacts with the RHYT region, thereby enabling kinase function in the absence of canonical phosphorylation.

UL-linked alterations in human MED12, including missense mutations and in-frame deletions/insertions, cluster exclusively within the N-terminal portion of Med12, suggesting a deleterious impact on Cdk8/CycC kinase activity (Fig. 4H). Prior biochemical studies have shown that these mutations disrupt the ability of human MED12 to activate CDK8/CycC (19, 20, 42). Nonetheless, the molecular basis for these biochemical observations has remained obscure. In this regard, we recently postulated that UL-linked mutations in MED12 disrupt its ability to activate CDK8 by disrupting its direct association with CycC, leading to loss of allosteric activation. Notably, however, our structural analysis reveals instead that UL-linked mutations in human MED12, including hotspot mutations G44D, Q43P, and L36R (corresponding to yeast Med12 residues G53, K52, and L46, respectively), as well as in-frame insertions/deletions (variously spanning human residues 26 to 55; corresponding to yeast residues 37 to 64), map to a region next to the T-loop and RHYT segment of Cdk8 (Fig. 4I). For example, yeast Med12 G53 (corresponding to human MED12 G44, the most frequently mutated residue in UL) is positioned next to the interface between the T-loop and RHYT segment (Fig. 4I). Accordingly, pathogenic mutations at G44, Q43, and L36 of human MED12 are likely to alter interactions between MED12 and the CDK8 T-loop/RHYT segment required for T-loop stability and kinase activity.

To examine this possibility, we first assessed the impact of orthologous pathogenic mutations in Med12N on its ability to bind and activate Cdk8/CycC. To this end, we introduced into Med12N substitution mutations L46R, K52P, and G53D (corresponding to UL hotspot mutations L36R, Q43P, and G44D in human MED12; Fig. 4J) and thereafter examined these mutant derivatives for their respective abilities to bind and stimulate Cdk8/CycC activity using an in vitro pull-down assay. We also assessed three additional M12N mutant derivatives, including E73A and I45R, which are not involved in Cdk8/CycC binding, and I89D, which is involved in CycC binding (Fig. 4J). Compared to WT Med12N, mutant derivatives L46R, K52P, and G53D exhibited no apparent difference in Cdk8/CycC binding activity (Fig. 4, C and K) but markedly reduced Cdk8/CycC kinase activity (Fig. 4, D and L). This is consistent with our prior findings that MED12 binding is necessary but not sufficient for CDK8/CycC activation and suggests that mutations L46R, K52P, and G53D in Med12 affect T-loop stability, resulting in decreased Cdk8 kinase activity. As expected, mutant derivatives I45R and E73A exhibited no reduction, compared to WT Med12N, in Cdk8/CycC binding and kinase-stimulatory activities, as our structure revealed that they are not involved in Cdk8/CycC binding. Notably, mutant derivative I89D compromised both the Cdk8/CycC binding and kinase stimulatory activities of Med12N (Fig. 4, K and L), indicating that the Med12-CycC interface is critical to anchor MED12N and thus facilitate Cdk8 activation through direct Med12N-Cdk8 interactions.

To better understand how pathogenic mutations in Med12 disrupt Cdk8 kinase activity, we introduced mutations K52P and G53D (corresponding to human UL-linked mutations Q43P and G44D) into the Cdk8/CycC/Med12N model structure and performed molecular dynamics simulations to assess flexibilities within the Cdk8 T-loop and RHYT regions as a function of these Med12N mutations. We also included an additional Med12N mutation at residue E42 (E42A) since the corresponding residue (E33) in human MED12 is a hotspot for mutation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (43). The RMSD data revealed similar stabilities for the T-loop and RHYT regions in both WT and mutant Cdk8/CycC/Med12N (Fig. 4, E and F). Notably, however, examination of the models showed that that the conformation of the RHYT region is altered in the mutant models (Fig. 4G, right). Furthermore, Cdk8 T-loop residues 313 to 315 and Y319 adopt altered conformations in the mutant compared to the WT models (Fig. 4G, right). Accordingly, we speculate that pathogenic mutations in Med12N stabilize the T-loop in a distinct conformation that is unfavorable for substrate phosphorylation, which could also explain why these mutations do not affect the binding of Med12N to Cdk8/CycC.

In eukaryotes, Ago proteins (~100 kDa) play a central role in gene-silencing processes guided by small RNAs (44). The structures of Ago proteins reveal a common architecture composed of four globular domains (N, PAZ, MID, and PIWI) and two linker domains (L1 and L2), which form two lobes (N-PAZ and MID-PIWI) with a central nucleic acidbinding cleft between them (45). The PIWI domain adopts a typical RNase H fold with a set of catalytic residues in the active site, while the MID and PAZ domains are involved in 5 and 3 guide RNA binding, respectively (45). On the basis of our structural findings, described below, we categorize Med13 as a new Ago subfamily.

Med13 is located at the middle of the CKM and interacts with Med12 and CycC (Fig. 1F). Although Med13 is widely present among eukaryotes, its physiological role nonetheless remains poorly understood because of limited structural and functional information. On the basis of sequence analysis, the N- and C-terminal regions in Med13 are inferred to be connected by a large intrinsically disordered region (IDR). Furthermore, the C-terminal region of Med13 was previously predicted to have Ago MID and PIWI domains, thus classifying Med13 as a member of the PIWI protein family (27). Unexpectedly, our structure herein reveals that Med13, in addition to MID and PIWI domains, is composed of several additional domains that define classical Argonaute (Ago) proteins (Fig. 5A and movie S3) (28, 45). Thus, despite low overall sequence homology between Med13 and Ago proteins, the structure of Med13 nonetheless revealed that four globular domains (N, PAZ, MID, and PIWI) and two linker domains (L1 and L2) form two lobes with a narrow central channel (Fig. 5B). The large IDR (residues 313 to 814) inferred from sequence analysis, and absent in typical Ago proteins, lies between the PAZ and L2 domains and is indeed disordered in the density map. Although Med13 adopts the bilobal architecture characteristic of ago proteins, no density corresponding to DNA or RNA was found within its central channel. This contrasts with previously reported eukaryotic Ago structures wherein the 5 and 3 guide RNAbinding sites and the central channel are typically occupied by cell-derived small RNAs following protein purification (4652), suggesting that the current Med13 structure within the CKM represents a nucleic acidfree (apo) conformation.

(A) Domain organization of Med13. (B) Structure of Med13. Colors are as in (A). The missing IDR is indicated by dashed lines. (C) Two views of Med13 structure. The L2-N of Med13 is colored in red. The central channel is indicated by a dashed oval. (D) Two views of hAgo2 structure (PDB ID: 4W5N). The 5 and 3 guide RNAs are indicated (red sticks). The L2 domain is colored in dark gray. (E) Left: A portion of Med13 L2-C (red) occupies the 5 nucleic acidbinding site at the MID domain. The residues in Med13 overlapped with the guide RNA in hAgo2 are shown in surface. Right: 5 guide RNA (red sticks) bound at the MID and PIWI domain of hAgo2. The first three 5 RNA nucleotides (U1, U2, and C3) are labeled. The catalytic tetrad residues in the PIWI domain are indicated. (F) Left: Residues in PAZ of Med13 involved in contacts with the N-terminal portion of L2-N (red) in Med13 are indicated. Right: Residues in PAZ of hAgo2 involved in interaction with 3 guide RNA are indicated.

Notably, while Med13 has an overall Ago architecture, our structural analysis nonetheless reveals several unique structural features that are not observed in typical Ago proteins. We identified four unique insertions (ins)two within the PAZ domain (PAZ-ins1 and PAZ-ins2), one between the MID and PIWI domains (MID-PIWI-ins), and one within the PIWI domain (PIWI-ins) (Fig. 5, A and B, and fig. S7A). Among these four insertion segments, three (PAZ-ins2, MID-PIWI-ins, and PIWI-ins) are involved in interactions with Med12 and contribute to stabilizing the CKM (fig. S7B), whereas the fourth (PAZ-ins1) is positioned into and thereby narrows the central cleft (fig. S7C). By comparing both the Med13 and human Ago 2 (hAgo2) structures, we found that all of their individual domains can be superimposed very well (fig. S7, D and E). However, their respective PAZ and PIWI domains, as well as their L2 domains, show greater divergence due to Med13-specific insertions and conformational differences. In Med13, the N-terminal region of the L2 domain (L2-N) adopts a hairpin structure, containing two helices (7 and 8), which extends from the rest of the domain, whereas the corresponding region in hAgo2 forms two helices in an L-shaped conformation adjacent to the elongated C-terminal region of L2 (fig. S7E).

In hAgo2, guide RNAs are threaded through the central channel, and their 5 and 3 ends are recognized by the MID and PAZ domains, respectively (47, 48). However, in contrast to hAgo2 structures, the corresponding nucleic acidbinding regions in our Med13 structure show distinctive features. The L2-N in Med13, which is a Med13-specific hairpin, starts by forming a short helix (7) in the PAZ domain, runs toward the MID domain across the central channel, and then inserts an helix (8) into the interface between the MID and PIWI domains (Fig. 5C). In hAgo2, the L2 domain instead adopts the typical conformation found in Ago proteins that does not run across the central cleft (Fig. 5D). Furthermore, in Med13, the central channel through which guide RNA would be threaded in hAgo2 is instead bound by a linker region between the 7 and 8 of L2-N (Fig. 5C). Last, in Med13, helix 7 and a coil fragment adjacent to helix 8 of L2N occupy the corresponding regions in hAgo2 that are bound by the 3 and 5 ends of the guide strand RNA, respectively (Fig. 5, E and F). These observations led us to propose that Med13 L2-N mimics Ago-bound guide RNA. Together, these structural considerations indicate that Med13 is inaccessible to nucleic acids because the central channel is occupied by L2-N. The implications of these unique structural features will be discussed subsequently.

In this study, we provide a near-atomic resolution structure of the entire CKM, one that redefines prior subunit organization, explains how Cdk8/CycC is recognized and activated by Med12, and newly identifies Med13 as a novel member of the Ago protein family. The fact that Cdk8 lacks a canonical phosphorylation residue in its T-loop and also forms a large complex with CycC, Med12, and Med13 distinguishes its mechanism of activation from other CDK family proteins. Our structural and biochemical studies reveal that Med12 forms critical contacts with both Cdk8 and CycC and establish a novel molecular mechanism for how Med12 activates Cdk8 kinase. The observation that UL-linked MED12 mutations localize to the vicinity of the Cdk8 T-loop and RHYT segment suggests that disruption of Mediator kinase activity is a major biochemical defect arising from these pathogenic mutations, providing new molecular insight into disease etiology. Accordingly, our structure also provides further rationale for targeting the MED12-CDK8/CycC interface for treatment of diseases caused by dysregulation of Cdk8 kinase activity.

Our structure shows that CycC, including its the conserved groove, provides a large surface area for extensive interactions with Med12. Biochemical analyses confirmed these interactions to be critical for the ability of Med12 to bind and activate Cdk8/CycC. Thus, targeted mutations in residues identified by structural analysis to comprise the CycC-Med12 interface were found to disrupt Med12 binding and Cdk8 activation. In addition, while clearly necessary, Med12 binding is not sufficient for Cdk8/CycC activation since we also show that mutations of Med12 residues (H1 and flanking residues) that are not involved in CycC interaction, including oncogenic Med12 mutations L46R, K52P, and G53D, disrupt the ability of Med12 to activate, but not to bind, Cdk8/CycC. These findings are consistent with our prior biochemical observations using human CKM proteins (19, 20) and indicate an additional step beyond CycC binding that is required for Med12-dependent Cdk8 activationone dependent on Med12 residues frequently mutated in UL and other tumors. Here, we identify this additional activation step to be the Med12-dependent stabilization of the Cdk8 T-loop with important implications for Cdk8-driven disease. In this regard, our studies revealed that the interaction of Med12H1 and its flanking residues (51 to 53) with the Cdk8 RHYT segment directs the latter to engage in a precise network of intramolecular interactions with the Cdk8 T-loop, leading to its stabilization in an activated conformation (Fig. 6A). Thus, we observed the Cdk8 T-loop to be flexible in the absence of Med12 (fig. S5D) and unfavorably poised for substrate binding and phosphorylation. By contrast, in the presence of Med12, the Cdk8 T-loop was found to be structured in an activated conformation with space sufficient to accommodate target substrates (Fig. 6A). Notably, the fully activated conformation of Cdk8 is realized only upon stabilization of its T-loop through extensive interactions occurring between the Cdk8 RHYT segment and Med12. Thus, binding of Med12 H1 and its flanking residues (amino acids 51 to 53) to the RHYT segment triggers a structural rearrangement in the latter; in turn, the rearranged RHYT segment, together with the Med12 residues 54 to 56 following H1, contributes to stabilization of the Cdk8 T-loop, thereby enabling kinase activity in the absence of canonical T-loop phosphorylation. Although our findings establish a novel mechanism for Cdk8 activation requiring Med12, they also raise an important question regarding whether and how the kinase activity of Med12-bound Cdk8/CycC is regulated. In this regard, it is notable that human MED12 has been shown to associate with certain activating noncoding RNAs that are able to stimulate the kinase activity of CDK8 toward histone H3 Ser10 (22, 25). Although detailed mechanisms remain to be clarified, it is possible that interactions of MED12 with other factors may affect the kinase activity and substrate specificity of CDK8.

(A) Model for Cdk8 kinase activated by Med12N. Left: In the absence of Med12, CycC-bound Cdk8 is in a partially activated conformation. The T-loop (red) is disordered, thus hindering substrates from entering into the catalytic site (yellow). A highly conserved region in CycC is highlighted in green. Middle: Binding of Med12 to the conserved groove in CycC allows its H1 to trigger rearrangements of the RHYT segment, leading to stabilization of the Cdk8 T-loop. Right: Stabilized T-loop leads to formation of platform for substrate phosphorylation. (B) Model of the Core MediatorCKM complex. The subunits of Core Mediator are highlighted by surface representations. The CKM is highlighted by a dashed outline. (C) Location of the CKM (dashed outline) on Core Mediator overlaps with RNAPII and TFIIH. Left: Structure of the Core MediatorRNAPII complex (PDB ID: 5U0S). Right: Structure of the Core MediatorPICTFIIH complex (PDB ID 5OQM). RNAPII and TFIIH are colored in yellow and gray, respectively. The remaining subunits of the PIC are colored in pink.

Our yeast CKM structure is not generally consistent with a recently reported study on the human CDK8/CycC/MED12N complex analyzed by XL-MS experiments, which concluded that MED12 makes extensive contacts with both the N- and C-lobes of CDK8 without substantially interacting with CycC (53). In our CKM structure, however, Med12N interacts extensively with CycC and contacts Cdk8 only at its C-lobe (Fig. 3A). We speculate that this discrepancy could be attributed to Med13, which was present in our CKM structure but absent in the prior XL-MSbased study. In our yeast CKM structure, the Med13 MID-PIWI-ins makes several contacts with the interface between Med12 H2 and CycC (Fig. 3A and fig. S4H), suggesting that Med13 could stabilize the Med12-CycC interaction. In the absence of MED13, it is likely that MED12N may not be able to stably wrap around CDK8/CycC, leading to conformational flexibility that precluded detectable contacts between MED12 and CycC in prior XL-MS experiments. Our findings are supported by near-atomic level structural determination and XL-MSbased confirmation carried out with the intact CKM. Considering significant protein sequence conservation between human and yeast Cdk8, CycC, and Med12 (N-terminal region), we believe that the interaction mode between Med12 and Cdk8/CycC is likely conserved among species.

Our studies further clarify the molecular basis of MED12 in human disease. In this regard, numerous pathogenic alterations, including germline mutations causing the intellectual disability disorders FG, Lujan, and Ohdo syndromes, as well as somatic driver mutations leading to UL, breast fibroadenomas, and prostate cancer, have been found in human MED12 (3135, 42, 54, 55). In general, different types of disease mutations are mapped on different regions of Med12, indicating that disease typespecific mutations in MED12 may differentially affect its function (fig. S8A). To clarify molecular mechanisms underlying disease typespecific mutations in MED12, we mapped pathogenic MED12 mutations onto our yeast CKM structure based on sequence alignment (fig. S8B). Although we did not assign residues for the Med12 HEAT domains (2 to 5) within the CKM, we found that MED12 mutations linked to FG, Lujan, and Ohdo syndromes, as well as prostate cancer, are nonetheless localized in the H-lobe (fig. S8B). This suggests that these mutations may influence interactions of MED12 with other factors but not CDK8/CycC.

By contrast, UL-linked alterations in MED12 were mapped exclusively within Med12 H1 and its flanking residues that critically interface with the Cdk8 RHYT/T-loop region, suggesting a deleterious impact on MED12-dependent CycC/Cdk8 activation (fig. S8B). Here, we confirm this prediction and, thus, clarify the mechanistic basis by which pathogenic mutations in MED12 drive tumorigenesis through CKM dysfunction. Curiously, our molecular dynamics simulations indicate that driver mutations in Med12, as opposed to triggering T-loop destabilization, instead promote reconfiguration of the Cdk8 T-loop into a stable conformation incompatible with efficient substrate binding and/or phosphorylation. This could effectively disable Cdk8 kinase activity, and, thus, circumvent a critical barrier to cellular transformation, while also preserving its structural integrity and retention of a critical kinase-independent (scaffolding) function required for cell viability (56, 57). Ongoing studies designed to elucidate the structure and function of CKM variants incorporating oncogenic Med12 mutant derivatives should clarify these and other pressing issues.

We found that Med13 has an Ago-like bilobal architecture, which implies an additional capability for CKM interaction with nucleic acid duplexes. Since nucleic acids were not observed in the central channel, the conformation of the current Med13 structure is more similar to the closed form of prokaryotic apo-Ago proteins (29, 5860). The PIWI domains of Ago proteins adopt an RNase H fold (28), but their slicing capability depends on the existence of the catalytic DEDD or DEDH tetrad in the active site (46). For instance, eukaryotic slicer Ago proteins, such as Kluyveromyces polysporus Ago, hAgo2, and hAgo3, have the catalytic tetrad in the active site (fig. S7F, top) (46, 51). Our structure described herein shows that the Med13 PIWI domain retains none of the previously identified catalytic residues (fig. S7F, bottom), suggesting that Med13 lacks endonucleolytic activity. However, similar to other human and yeast Ago proteins, Med13 does carry some positively charged residues along the central channel on the surface of the PIWI and MID domains (fig. S7G). These structural observations suggest that the channel of Med13 retains nucleic acidbinding ability but is nonetheless occupied by L2-N (Fig. 5, C, E, and F). This contradiction could be explained if the current structure reflects an autoinhibition state, one in which the central channel cannot interact with nucleic acids that absent a regulated release of the coil fragments of L2-N. Rearrangement of L2-N may enable the central channel of Med13 to capture nucleic acid duplexes without cleavage, given that the Med13 PIWI domain lacks a catalytic tetrad. Supporting this, the CKM was found to preferentially associate with highly transcribed genes in yeast (61, 62) that have the propensity to generate DNAsmall RNA hybrids. In this regard, it is perhaps notable that deletion of Med13 in yeast has been implicated in R-loop formation and genomic instability (63). On the basis of these observations, the CKM might be involved in the modulation of high-level gene expression through Med13. On the other hand, Med13 might bind to an RNA stem region in long noncoding RNAs. This ability could correlate with the observation that the CKM is located in enhancer elements genome wide (64) and might also be involved in enhancer-promoter looping through interactions with enhancer RNAs (22). Further studies will be required to investigate whether and what type of nucleic acid duplex binds to Med13 and how such a role regulates the transcription process.

Prior studies have reported that the CKM is able to suppress activated transcription in vitro and precludes interaction of RNAPII with the Mediator (5, 9, 21). To understand how the CKM forms a complex with Core Mediator, we developed a model by fitting our CKM and previously reported Core Mediator structures into a negative-stain EM map of yeast Mediator-CKM complex (fig. S9) (3, 5). This model indicates that the CKM is localized to the top portion of Core Mediator at which Med12 and Med13 subunits are close to the Hook and Neck regions (Fig. 6B). This is in agreement with previous biochemical observations that human MED12 and MED13 are able to associate with a part of Mediator Middle module subunits (5). Notably, when compared with cryo-EM structures of RNAPIICore Mediator and TFIIHPICCore Mediator (Fig. 6C) (3, 65), our model reveals that the location of CKM on Core Mediator partially overlaps with those of both RNAPII and TFIIH, suggesting steric hindrance as the basis by which the CKM precludes interactions of Pol II and TFIIH with the Mediator and suppresses the activated transcription. A high-resolution structure of the Mediator-CKM complex will reveal more detailed information about how the CKM interacts with Mediator and represses transcription.

The CKM constitutes a large sophisticated and multifunctional macromolecular complex. Here, we have shown that in addition to a noncanonically activated and oncogenic mutation-sensitive cyclin-dependent kinase, the CKM comprises both an Ago-like Med13 and an elongated Med12 subunit with a HEAT core that offers great potential for regulatory interactions. The capabilities of the CKM to phosphorylate transcription factors, to associate with activating noncoding RNAs, and to regulate Mediator-RNAPII interaction demonstrate the broad influence of CKM on RNAPII gene transcription. Further studies are warranted to determine how the structural and functional complexity of the CKM are exploited to expand the regulatory potential of Mediator in transcriptional regulation.

All yeast strains used in this study were constructed from a protease-deficient yeast strain BJ2168 (American Type Culture Collection, 208277). Yeast gene manipulations, including TAP, hemagglutinin (HA), and Flag tagging, subunit deletion, and truncation, were carried out by using a standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR)based transformation protocol (66). To generate a TAP-tagged strain of CycC, the pBS1479 plasmid was used to introduce a TAP tag at the C terminus of the targeted protein. The pFA6a-Flag-kanMX6 and pHyg-AID-HA plasmids were used to introduce a 5xFLAG tag and 1 HA tag at the C terminus of Med12 and Med13, respectively. For subunit deletion or truncation, a PCR-amplified KanMX6 or Hyg cassette was used to replace either the entirety of an open reading frame or a specific region. The tagged yeast strains were confirmed by Western blot analysis. The strains with subunit deletion or truncation were verified by DNA sequencing. Yeast strains used in this study are listed in table S1.

DNA fragments encoding residues 1 to 105, 106 to 419, 420 to 596, 597 to 789, 789 to 1335, and 1336 to 1427 of yeast Med12 were generated by PCR amplification using full-length Med12 DNA as a template and ligated into pGEX6P-1. The I45R, K52P, G53D, E73A, and I89D mutants were generated using the pGEX6P-1-Med12-(1105) WT plasmid as a template. All constructs were verified by DNA sequencing. WT and mutants of Med12-(1105), fused to the C terminus of glutathione S-transferase (GST) protein, were expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) by addition of IPTG (isopropyl--d-thiogalactopyranoside) at a final concentration of 1 mM for 3 hours at 37C. After induction, E. coli cells were harvested and lysed by sonication in buffer A [1 phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.4), 2 mM -mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol, and 0.1% NP-40] containing protease inhibitors (Roche). The lysate was clarified by high-speed centrifugation at 20,000 rpm for 30 min using a Beckman 45 Ti rotor, and the resulting supernatant was incubated with glutathione Sepharose 4B beads (GE Healthcare) for 30 min at 4C. Beads were washed three times using buffer A. Proteins were eluted by buffer A containing 10 mM glutathione and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Purified proteins were subjected to the following kinase assay experiments. For GST pull-down assays, each of the Med12 fragments or mutants, fused to the C terminus of GST protein, was expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) followed by the procedure as described below.

Yeast cells of CycC-TAP/Med12/Med13 from 20 liters of 2 YPD (yeast extract, peptone, and dextrose) medium were used to obtain cell extract that contains endogenous Cdk8/CycC proteins. To examine the interaction between Cdk8/CycC and Med12 fragments, lysates of E. coli cells from 50 ml of LB medium expressing GST alone, GST-Med12-(1105), GST-Med12-(106419), GST-Med12-(420596), GST-Med12-(597789), GST-Med12-(7891335), or GST-Med12-(13361427) were clarified by high-speed centrifugation. Each supernatant was incubated with 20 l of glutathione Sepharose 4B beads (GE Healthcare) in buffer A containing protease inhibitors for 30 min at 4C. The bead resin was washed three times with buffer A followed by the addition of 1 ml of yeast cell extract (0.5 mg/ml; CycC-TAP/Med12/Med13) and then incubated for 30 min at 4C. The resin was washed five times using buffer A and then eluted using 50 l of elution buffer A containing 10 mM glutathione. The eluates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting using anti-GST antibodies (GenScript, A0086640) and antiprotein A antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich, P1291). The same procedure was performed as described above to analyze the interaction between Cdk8/CycC and wild type or mutants (E42A, I45R, L46R, K52P, G53D, E73A, or I89D) of GST-Med12-(1105).

pFastBac Dual plasmids carrying WT or mutant (S210E, A227R, or F235E in CycC or D410R or I449E in Cdk8) yeast Cdk8-FLAG/CycC-6xHis were transformed into DH10Bac competent cells (Invitrogen). The isolated recombinant bacmid DNAs from white colonies were used for transfection of Sf9 insect cells. After three rounds of viral amplification, high-titer baculoviruses (P3) were used for infection of High Five cells (Invitrogen). After 48 hours after infection, 50 ml of cells was harvested and lysed with binding buffer B [20 mM Hepes (pH 7.5), 300 mM NaCl, 0.1% NP-40, 0.1 mM EDTA, 2 mM -mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol, and cOmplete protease inhibitors (Roche)] using a dounce homogenizer at 4C. Lysates were clarified by high-speed centrifugation at 20,000 rpm for 30 min. Supernatants containing WT or mutant yeast Cdk8-FLAG/CycC-6xHis were subjected to FLAG immunoprecipitation (IP) for 1 hour at 4C in buffer B. The FLAG bead resin was washed three times with buffer B followed by the addition of 1 ml of E. coli cell extract [0.5 mg/ml; GST or GST-Med12-(1105)] and then incubated for 1 hour at 4C. The resin was washed five times using buffer B and then eluted using 50 l of elution buffer B containing 1 FLAG peptide (200 g/ml). The eluates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting using anti-GST antibodies (GenScript, A0086640), antiFLAG M2 antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich, F1804), and anti-His antibodies (R&D Systems, MAB050).

The CTD of yeast RNAPII (residues 1535 to 1733) with a C-terminal 6 His-tag was fused to the C terminus of GST. GST-CTD-His6 was expressed in E. coli and purified using glutathione Sepharose 4B beads (GE Healthcare) following standard procedures. CKM and Cdk8/CycC proteins were purified from CycC-TAP and CycC-TAP/Med12/Med13 yeast cells, respectively, by ammonium sulfate precipitation and TAP purification procedures, as described (7). Purified Cdk8/CycC was confirmed by MS showing absence of Med12 and Med13 (data S2). Purified CKM (100 ng) or Cdk8/CycC (25 ng) was incubated at 30C for 30 min in kinase buffer (100 l) containing 1 PBS (pH 7.4), 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM ATP, and purified GST-CTD-His6 substrate. Reactions were terminated by addition of SDS sample buffer. The samples were processed by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blotting using anti-His antibodies (R&D Systems, MAB050), anti-GST antibodies (GenScript, A0086640), and anti-CBP (Calmodulin Binding Protein) antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich, 07482). The antibody that recognizes phosphorylated Ser5 of CTD (GenScript, A10634) was used to detect CTD phosphorylation. To assay effects of Med12N on kinase activity of Cdk8/CycC, reactions were carried with 60 ng of purified Cdk8/CycC and 250 or 1 g of purified GST-Med12-(1105) at 30C for 30 min in kinase buffer (100 l) containing 1 PBS (pH 7.4), 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM ATP, and purified GST-CTD-His6 substrate. To assay effects of Med12 mutants on kinase activity of Cdk8/CycC, we incubated 60 ng of purified Cdk8/CycC with 600 ng of purified WT, I45R, K52P, G53D, E73A, or I89D GST-Med12-(1105) in the same kinase reaction buffer (100 l) for 30 min at 30C. The reactions were terminated and analyzed by the same procedure as described above.

Yeast cells of BJ2168, CycC-TAP/Med12-5FLAG/Med13-HA, and CycC-TAP/Med12(13451427)-5FLAG/Med13-HA from 50 ml of cultures were harvested by centrifugation (4000g, 10 min, 4C). Harvested cells were washed twice with Milli-Q H2O, resuspended in 1 ml of binding buffer [20 mM Hepes (pH 7.6), 500 mM NaCl, 0.1% NP-40, 5 mM -mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol, 0.5 mM EDTA, and protease inhibitors], and lysed using BeadBeater for 5 min at 4C. Cell lysates were then centrifuged at 38,000 rpm for 30 min using a Beckman SW60 Ti rotor. Supernatants were collected and subjected to IP using 20 l of IgG-Sepharose resin (GE Healthcare) for 1 hour of binding at 4C in the binding buffer. After binding, reactions were washed five times using 0.5 ml of binding buffer without protease inhibitors and followed by tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease cleavage for 1 hour at 20C. The elutes were processed by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blotting using anti-HA antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich, 11867423001), antiFlag M2 antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich, F1804), and anti-CBP antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich, 07482).

CycC-TAPtagged yeast cells were grown in 50 liters of 2 YPD medium. Cells were harvested, washed, and frozen using liquid nitrogen followed by a blending process. Whole-cell extract was prepared starting from 800 g of broken-cell powder as described (5). Briefly, lysed cells were resuspended in purification buffer [100 mM tris-HCl (pH 7.8), 500 mM ammonium sulfate, 2 mM EDTA, 5 mM -mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol, and protease inhibitors] followed by ammonium sulfate precipitation. The pellet containing CKM was dissolved using immunoglobulin G (IgG) binding buffer [25 mM Hepes (pH 7.4), 200 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 2 mM -mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol, 0.01% NP-40, and protease inhibitors] followed by high-speed centrifugation at 42,000 rpm for 30 min using a Beckman 50.2 Ti rotor. The supernatant was incubated with 4 ml of IgG-Sepharose beads (GE Healthcare) for 4 hours at 4C. After incubation, the column was washed with buffer [25 mM Hepes (pH 7.4), 200 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 2 mM -mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol, 0.01% NP-40, and 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT)] followed by the addition of TEV protease incubated overnight at 4C. The CKM was then eluted in buffer [25 mM Hepes (pH 7.4), 200 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 2 mM -mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol, and 0.01% NP-40] followed by ion exchange Q chromatography. The peak fractions were collected and concentrated (Vivaspin, 50 kDa, GE Healthcare) for preparation of cryo-EM specimens.

Briefly, 3.0 l of WT CKM (~1 mg/ml) in buffer [25 mM Hepes (pH 7.4), 200 mM NaCl, and 0.005% NP-40] were directly applied to grow discharged 400-mesh C-flat holey carbon grids (EMS) with 2 m by 1 m holes. After incubation for 10 s, each grid was blotted for 3 to 4 s at 4C with 100% humidity and vitrified in liquid ethane using a Vitrobot Mark IV (FEI). The grids were imaged on a 300-kV Titan Krios electron microscope (FEI) using a GIF Quantum K2 direct electron detector (Gatan) operating in counting mode. Images were automatically collected at 0.8- to 3.5-m underfocus values with a nominal pixel size of 1.07 per pixel using EPU (FEI). Each image was exposed for 8 s with a total dose of approximately 65 electrons/2, which was fractioned into 40 frames. MotionCor2 was used to align frames (67). The parameters of contrast transfer function (CTF) for each image were estimated using the program Gctf (68). Images with an estimated resolution better than 7 and underfocus values between 0.8 and 3.5 m were selected, resulting in 15,075 micrographs (table S2). An initial particle picking was carried out using template-free picking on ~1000 micrographs followed by 2D clustering in RELION (69). Five of 2D class averages showing different views of CKM were used as templates to perform template-based picking on the 15,075 micrographs using Gautomatch (70), resulting in a total of 815,542 images. 2D clustering in cryoSPARC (71) was carried out to obtain a stack of 230,748 images that was used to generate initial 3D models of CKM. 3D classification was carried out in RELION (69) to identify a set of 138,178 images that was run through 3D refinement, Bayesian polishing, and CTF refinement to obtain a 3D map of CKM at 4.4- resolution. For Kinase- and Central-lobes of the CKM, the 138,178 images were further 3D classified and refined with a focused mask that covered both lobes, resulting in a final map of Kinase/Central-lobes at 3.8- resolution. For the H-lobe of CKM, we also started from the 138,178 images and performed 3D classification with a mask that only covered the H-lobe using cryoSPARC and RELION (69, 71). A final stack of 36,691 images were selected to run 3D refinement with the same mask, resulting in a final H-lobe map at 4.9- resolution. The resolutions of final 3D maps were estimated using gold-standard Fourier shell correlation curves with 0.143 criteria (72). RELION was used to calculate local resolutions. An image analysis procedure for the cryo-EM data of CKM is shown in fig. S1.

To build the CKM atomic model, we started by rigid-body fitting the x-ray structure of human CDK8/CycC [Protein Data Bank (PDB ID): 3RGF] (38) into the cryo-EM map of Kinase/Central-lobes using Chimera (73). The model building of yeast Cdk8/CycC was facilitated by sequence alignments of Cdk8/CycC between yeast and human. The rest portion of the Kinase/Central-lobes map was of sufficient quality for ab initio model building for the N- and C-terminal regions, and HEAT-1 domain of Med12, and Med13, facilitated by secondary structure predictions from PHYRE2 web server (74). For model building of the H-lobe, the main-chain trajectory of Med12 HEAT domains (2 to 5) was able to be traced in the map. Alanine residues were assigned to this model. The model building and adjustments were done using Coot (75). Refinement of the Kinase/Central and H models against their corresponding cryo-EM maps were done by using the real-space refinement in Phenix (76). Both models built from two cryo-EM maps were combined to obtain an overall CKM model. In the final CKM model, amino acids for Cdk8 (1 to 47, 97 to 173, 190 to 194, 372 to 374, and 490 to 555), CycC (1, 46 to 56, 245 to 260, and 319 to 323), Med12 (1 to 3, 297 to 308, 1026 to 1068, and 1327 to 1343), and Med13 (1 to 4, 313 to 813, 1123 to 1141, and 1401 to 1420) were not built because of missing or poor densities. The connection that contains 17 missing residues (1327 to 1343) between Med12 HEAT-5 and Med12C is disordered with a distance of ~20 . The final overall model was validated using MolProbity (table S2) (76). All molecular graphic figures, including overall and local density maps, were made by Chimera or PyMOL.

The yeast CKM purified by ion exchange Q chromatography was dialyzed into a buffer containing 50 mM Hepes (pH 7.9), 200 mM NaCl, 2 mM -mercaptoethanol, 0.01% NP-40, and 10% glycerol. The protein sample was resuspended with a disuccinimidyl dibutyric urea (DSBU) cross-linker (6 mM final, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and incubated for 90 min on ice. The reaction was quenched with ammonium bicarbonate and further incubated for 30 min on ice. Cross-linked proteins were reduced with 10 mM DTT for 30 min at 30C, followed by alkylation with iodoacetamide (50 mM final, Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 min at 30C. The proteins were processed by S-Trap (ProtiFi) with its recommended protocol: with trypsin in 1:10 (w/w) enzyme-to-protein ratio for an hour at 30C. Eluted peptides were dried under vacuum and resuspended with the peptide fractionation elution buffer: LC-MS (liquid chromatographyMS)grade 70% (v/v) water, 30% (v/v) acetonitrile (ACN), and 0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). Peptide fraction was performed on KTA pure 25 with Superdex 30 Increase 3.2/300 (GE Healthcare) at a flow rate of 30 l min1 of the elution buffer with a 100-l fraction volume. Fractions containing enriched cross-linked peptides, which were empirically determined by the elution profile, were retained and dried under vacuum and resuspended with 0.1% (v/v) TFA containing LC-MSgrade water for MS analysis. Each fraction was analyzed on a Q Exactive HF mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled with Dionex UltiMate 3000 UHPLC system (Thermo Fischer Scientific) with an in-house C18 column. Half of each sample amount was injected for the analysis and separated on a 90-min gradient: mobile phase A [99.9% water with 0.1% formic acid (Sigma-Aldrich)]; mobile phase B (80% ACN with 0.1% formic acid); starting 5% B, increased to 45% B for 90 min, then kept B constant at 90% for 5 min, and sharply decreased to 5% B for 5 min for re-equilibration of the column with the constant flow rate set to 400 nl min1. The data-dependent acquisition method was set as follows: full MS resolution of 120,000; MS1 Automatic Gain Control (AGC) target of 1 106; MS1 maximum injection time (IT) of 200 ms; scan range of 300 to 1800; data-dependent tandem MS (MS/MS) resolution of 30,000; MS/MS AGC target of 2 105; MS2 maximum IT of 300 ms; fragmentation was enforced by higher-energy collisional dissociation with stepped collision energy with 25, 27, and 30; loop count top of 12; isolation window of 1.5; fixed first mass of 130; MS2 minimum AGC target of 800; charge exclusion: unassigned,1, 2, 3, 8, and >8; peptide match off; exclude isotope on; dynamic exclusion of 45 s. Raw files were converted to mgf format with TurboRawToMGF 2.0.8 (77): Precursor mass weight range of 300 to 10,000 Da and all default removal options were off. Searches for cross-linked peptides were performed by MeroX 2.0.0.5 (78) with the default setting for DSBU with the following minor modifications: mass limit from 300 to 10,000 Da, minimum charge (MS1) set to 4, apply prescore and score cutoff to 10, and false discovery rate (FDR) cutoff set to 1%. All search results from each fractions MS acquisition was combined and filtered by recalculated FDR at 1%. Redundant cross-linked pairs were sorted by the main score, and the top hit was chosen for the final report table and mapping onto the structure in Chimera (73) with Xlink Analyzer plugin (79).

Preparation of the model protein structure began with a cryo-EM structure of yeast CDK8-CycC-Med12N that contained some disconnected outer-loop regions that were remote from our areas of interest. To obtain an intact structure of the complex for molecular dynamics simulation, we used the online homology model builder SWISS-MODEL (80) with human CDK8-CycC structure (PDB ID: 5XS2 (81)] as a template. For the simulations of mutant Med12N, we used the Swiss PDB Viewer program (82) to perform the mutations, which selects the most energetically favorable rotamers of the mutated residue side chains. Molecular dynamics simulations were prepared and carried out by the Amber18 molecular dynamics package (83) using the ff14SB force field for proteins (84). All systems were solvated with a rectangular box of explicit TIP3P water extending 12 beyond the solute edges. Explicit Cl ions were added only to neutralize the overall system charge. Systems were minimized in three steps, starting with hydrogen atoms only, then protein side chains, and, lastly, the entire structure, for 500, 5000, and 5000 steps, respectively. This was followed by isothermic-isobaric (NPT) ensemble equilibration in 50-K increments from 100 to 298 K, first for water only and then for the entire system, for 200 ps at each temperature. All production molecular dynamics simulations were performed in the NPT ensemble at 298 K using the Langevin thermostat for 500 ns with a 2-fs time step. A 12- cutoff distance was used for direct nonbonded energy calculations, and long-range electrostatics were calculated by the particle mesh Ewald method. The SHAKE algorithm was used to constrain water hydrogen atoms. Raw trajectories were saved every 2 ps and then processed and resaved every 20 ps using Ambers cpptraj (85) for analysis.

I. Y. B.-S. D. A. Case, S. R. Brozell, D. S. Cerutti, T. E. Cheatham III, V. W. D. Cruzeiro, T. A. Darden, R. E. Duke, D. Ghoreishi, M. K. Gilson, H. Gohlke, A. W. Goetz, D. Greene, R. Harris, N. Homeyer, Y. Huang, S. Izadi, A. Kovalenko, T. Kurtzman, T. S. Lee, S. LeGrand, P. Li, C. Lin, J. Liu, T. Luchko, R. Luo, D. J. Mermelstein, K. M. Merz, Y. Miao, G. Monard, C. Nguyen, H. Nguyen, I. Omelyan, A. Onufriev, F. Pan, R. Qi, D. R. Roe, A. Roitberg, C. Sagui, S. Schott-Verdugo, J. Shen, C. L. Simmerling, J. Smith, R. Salomon- Ferrer, J. Swails, R. C. Walker, J. Wang, H. Wei, R. M. Wolf, X. Wu, L. Xiao, D. M. York, P. A. Kollman, AMBER 2018 (University of California, San Francisco, 2018).

Acknowledgments: We thank F. Asturias for helpful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript. We thank K. Morano, N. Kim, and P. Christie for providing a Med13 yeast strain, a yeast pNK150 plasmid, and two E. coli expression plasmids, respectively. We thank T. Otomo for providing a TEV protease expression plasmid. We thank the Electron Cryo-Microscopy Core Facility of the UTHealth McGovern Medical School for cryo-EM data collection. We thank MS facilities at the University of Pennsylvania and the UTHealth for the XL-MS analysis and protein identification, respectively. Funding: This work was supported by the Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas, grant number 13127 to CPRIT Scholar in Cancer Research, K.-L.T., and the Welch Foundation (AU-2050-20200401) and U.S. National Institutes of Health grants CA196539, GM110174, and AI118891 (B.A.G.), HD087417 and HD094378 (T.G.B.), R01 GM124320 (K.N.), R01 GM123233 (K.M.), R01 GM-109045 (C.-e.C.), and S10 OD023592-01 and T32 GM133398-01 (H.J.K.). Y.-C.L. was supported, in part, by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, R.O.C. under grant number MOST 108-2917-I-564-025. Author contributions: Y.-C.L., T.-C.C., and K.-L.T. performed all experiments related to high-resolution cryo-EM analysis, including cryo-EM grid preparation, cryo-EM data collection and processing, and model building and refinement. Y.-C.L., T.-C.C., G.L., S.-F.C., and L.S. executed yeast cell culture and CKM purification. H.J.K., K.M., and B.A.G. designed and performed XL-MS analysis of the CKM. Y.-C.L. and T.-C.C. performed expression and purification of recombinant Med12 proteins. T.C. and C.-e.C. performed molecular dynamics simulation experiments. Y.-C.L., T.-C.C., and T.G.B. designed and performed binding assay and kinase activity measurement. Y.-C.L., T.-C.C., H.J.K., T.C., C.-e.C., K.N., K.M., B.A.G., T.G.B., and K.-L.T. discussed, interpreted results, and wrote the manuscript. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Data and materials availability: Cryo-EM maps of the yeast CKM, Kinase/Central-lobes, and H-lobe were deposited to the EMDataBank with accession numbers EMD-22991, EMD-22989, and EMD-22990, respectively. Their corresponding atomic models were deposited to the RCSB Protein Data Bank with accession numbers 7KPX, 7KPV, and 7KPW, respectively. All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors.

Link:
Structure and noncanonical Cdk8 activation mechanism within an Argonaute-containing Mediator kinase module - Science Advances

Posted in Biochemistry | Comments Off on Structure and noncanonical Cdk8 activation mechanism within an Argonaute-containing Mediator kinase module – Science Advances

The Genetic Information Age is here. Are we ready? – Angelus News

The 1997 science fiction film Gattaca is set in a dystopic future in which the practice of eugenics selective breeding designed to pass on desired genetic traits is the norm.

In this society, couples who want to have children pursue technological reproduction rather than natural procreation. This allows them to pick which of their embryonic children they want to bear after surveying their genomes.

The moral imperative is for parents to conceive and bear the best possible child, not only with preferred physical traits or predispositions for particular talents, but also free from hereditary disease and disability.

To roll the dice and welcome whatever child you get is seen as irresponsible: Not only would you be knowingly disadvantaging your child, you would also be risking reintroducing undesirable genes back into the gene pool.

Sadly, what was science fiction just a few years ago has become a reality.

In the cover story of the December issue of The Atlantic, reporter Sarah Zhang visits Denmark, a country considered moral pioneers in the field of prenatal genetic testing, diagnosis, and decision-making.

In her conversations with families and experts, Zhang uncovers a devastating trend: more than 95% of pregnancies that have a test result showing a likelihood of Trisomy 21, known more commonly as Down syndrome, end in abortion. The phenomenon of selective abortion is gaining traction despite the fact that some results are false positives, and the fact that persons with Trisomy 21 have excellent survival rates and life expectancies.

Persons with Trisomy 21 have varying symptoms (and varying degrees of severity of symptoms), including intellectual disabilities and muscular-skeletal issues. They are more susceptible to heart problems, gastrointestinal abnormalities, and speech issues. Severe cases require significant intervention, therapy, and resources.

Yet others with Down syndrome go to college, find employment, live independently, and get married. Just like any person, their particular challenges and strengths become evident over time, in part due to their genetic makeup as well as the environment in which they develop.

Within hours of the 8,000-word articles publication online, some were praising Zhangs reporting for humanizing and giving a voice to people with Down syndrome. Others, including pro-lifers, expressed outrage: For instance, one writer at The Federalist accused the author of seeking to create sympathy and understanding for eugenics and a modern-day genocide.

But beyond the pieces implications for the pro-life and pro-choice movements, Zhang identifies an uncomfortable, telling paradox one that signals the dawn of what has been called the genetic information age. She writes:

In wealthy countries, it seems to be at once the best and the worst time for Down syndrome. Better health care has more than doubled life expectancy. Better access to education means most children with Down syndrome will learn to read and write. Few people speak publicly about wanting to eliminate Down syndrome. Yet individual choices are adding up to something very close to that.

Put in other words, the article is an invitation for the world to ask itself: How can a society that celebrates diversity, inclusion, and tolerance allow its members who have genetic differences to be systematically, surgically extracted from its population?

During an amniocentesis, a doctor punctures the abdominal wall of a pregnant woman to withdraw the fluid. The fluid is then analyzed for various chromosomal abnormalities. Today, that information can be gleaned from a mothers blood sample by the 10th week of pregnancy. (Shutterstock)

Three overlapping factors have created new moral questions around child-bearing: 1) reproductive technologies, originally designed to assist couples struggling with infertility, have proliferated in type and availability; 2) the project to map the human genome, completed in 2003, has given scientists and doctors a window into the genes of their patients as well as their patients gametes; and 3) prenatal genetic testing has become a routine part of obstetric care.

While originally developed to assist couples who were unable to conceive children through natural procreation, artificial reproductive technologies (ART) now comprise a booming fertility industry. Services like in vitro fertilization are now cheaper, less riskier to women, and more likely to be covered by insurance and thus more widely available.

Because marriage and child-bearing are increasingly delayed in wealthier nations, both infertility and the risk of chromosomal abnormalities are on the rise. This makes in vitro fertilization, now paired with genetic testing, a more desirable method of reproduction: From a consumer standpoint, getting the healthiest possible child is the best investment in terms of time, cost, and risk.

But even if a woman gets pregnant naturally, she is likely to be offered prenatal screening for major chromosomal abnormalities. In the U.S., prenatal testing was generally offered to women over 35 or those with high-risk pregnancies. As of 2019, more than 60% of OBGYNs had offered it as part of their standard care to all patients.

In Denmark, nearly all pregnant women choose to have their developing children screened for genetic abnormalities.

Prenatal testing used to be done later in the second trimester if an ultrasound revealed atypical development, or if parents knew they were carriers for genetic conditions. Today, that information as well as the sex of the baby can be gleaned from a mothers blood sample by the 10th week of pregnancy.

Genetic counselors are supposed to present findings with value neutrality, meaning their language and affect is not supposed to sway patients decision-making. But Zhang spoke to advocates for persons with Down syndrome who were actively lobbying health care providers to change their language, for fear that the increase in selective abortion was correlated to language that increased parental fear.

Even shifting language from risk to probability could help open parents up to choosing life, they argued.

In many of the cases Zhang learned about, the children were originally wanted sometimes desperately so but in one catastrophic moment, they became unwanted. Parental fears about their childs quality of life as well as disappointment over losing the family that they had hoped for swayed them toward abortion.

Suddenly, Zhang writes, a new power was thrust into the hands of ordinary people the power to decide what kind of life is worth bringing into the world.

The world that The Atlantic article describes is one shaped by what Notre Dame law and political science professor O. Carter Snead calls expressive individualism in his new book What It Means to Be Human: The Case for the Body in Public Bioethics (Harvard University Press, $39.95).

This philosophy equates being fully human with finding the unique truth within ourselves and freely constructing our individual lives to reflect it, writes Snead. It considers human relationships as transactional, formed by agreements, promises, and consent for the mutual benefits of the parties involved.

Such a philosophy, he argues, leaves us without a coherent vision of our moral obligations to one another, especially the most vulnerable. This is illustrated in Zhangs piece by a series of moral quandaries that selective abortion poses.

Pope Francis kisses Peter Lombardi, 12, of Columbus, Ohio, after the boy rode in the popemobile during his general audience in St. Peter's Square at the Vatican in 2018. (Catholic News Service/Vatican Media)

If reproductive decision-making is an individual choice, what should a society do when thousands (or millions) of individual choices result in massive demographic or sociological changes?

Is a eugenic movement brought about by a societys own choosing any less problematic than one which is forced on a people, such as the campaign to eradicate persons with disabilities designed by the Nazis or the current campaign by the Chinese government to eliminate its Uyghurs population?

Zhang uncovers what she calls the most perverse moral problem in an exchange with a Danish woman who heads the National Down Syndrome Association. The woman, who is also a mother to 18-year-old son with Down syndrome, educates expectant parents about the condition.

During one of their conversations, the teenage boy leans over and looks at his mothers phone. The title of a controversial documentary called Death to Down Syndrome was displayed on the screen, and he immediately recoiled.

The reporter realized that he was cognizant of the fact that there are people who dont want people like him to be born. Moreover, his mother supports the right to abortion, even in cases like his.

The scene illustrates the ultimate conundrum for a society that supports the unrestricted right to abortion while claiming to uphold the equality of all human beings as a foundational moral principle: A woman must convince her child that his life is valuable, dignified, and worthy of living, while also supporting the rights of others to end the life of their child with his same genetic markers.

The response of a Catholic reader to the article would seem clear-cut: Because abortion is the taking of human life in its most vulnerable stage, it violates the fundamental right of all human beings to continue their life until natural death. Abortion, as well as any reproductive technology involving the creation, testing, and destruction of embryos, must be rejected.

But Catholic teaching does not stop at the moral evaluation of the technology or the act of abortion. The Gospel goes deeper it speaks to the heart of parents who receive a devastating diagnosis. It speaks to the vocation of health care workers and geneticists to heal when they can and offer comfort when they cannot. And it speaks to families about what it means to be open to the mystery of Gods design for family life.

In a 2019 speech, Pope Francis lamented the fact that thanks to modern prenatal testing techniques, even the suspicion of an illness, and especially the certainty of a disease, changes the experience of pregnancy and causes deep distress to women and couples.

The isolation and worry about the suffering that lies ahead, the pope said, is like a silent cry, a call for help in the darkness, when faced with an illness whose outcome cannot be foreseen with certainty.

In the face of fear and isolation, parents need support from a larger community, whether through their extended family, the parish, or others who have been in their situation. Support from a community is the first antidote to the individualism and isolation of reproductive choice.

When it comes to the issue of medical language, The Atlantic article notes that while genetic counselors and obstetricians are trained and required to present genetic information in as neutral a way as possible to patients, that doesnt always happen.

Pope Francis has admonished clinicians who use the phrase incompatible with life to describe genetic conditions that correspond with short lifespans or severe physical and cognitive impairments. For one thing, where there is a living human being, there is life.

Second, he says:

No human being can ever be unfit for life, whether due to age, state of health or quality of existence. Every child who appears in a womans womb is a gift that changes a familys history, the life of fathers and mothers, grandparents and of brothers and sisters. That child needs to be welcomed, loved and nurtured.

The fact that so many parents, when faced with a diagnosis of Down syndrome or other genetic anomalies, choose abortion tells Catholics a few things about why and where the Gospel is needed.

A society that reveres health and wellness is one that will have trouble in the face of sickness, aging, and death. It needs to hear the good news that suffering has been redeemed, and that it stretches the hearts of patients, caregivers, and the people they encounter.

A scene from the movie Gattaca. (IMDB)

Being mortals, bodily decay or dysfunction will come to all of us; some members of our human family experience it more acutely or earlier than others. They should receive more care, not more marginalization, because of it.

A materialist society that reduces people to their bodies and even microscopically, to their genetic material needs to know the truth that human beings have a body and a soul. The most important quality that children have and develop is their capacity to love, something that does not depend on their physical or cognitive ability.

A consumer-driven society, one that has become accustomed to customizable, curated lifestyles, is one that considers parenthood as a fulfillment of desires or a way to construct meaning and identity. Such a society which does not pause at the ways it commodifies its children needs to be reminded to protect the little ones. And a society that has unlimited access to information desperately needs wisdom.

The opening credits of Gattaca include a cautionary line from the Book of Ecclesiastes: Consider what God has done: Who can straighten what He has made crooked?

The answer to this rhetorical question should humble us. It should also help us to see all children not as something owed, but as gifts to be received as is, with all of their challenges and strengths.

Go here to see the original:
The Genetic Information Age is here. Are we ready? - Angelus News

Posted in Human Reproduction | Comments Off on The Genetic Information Age is here. Are we ready? – Angelus News

Beware The Transhumanists: How ‘being Human’ Is Being Re-engineered By The Elite’s Covid-19 Coup – The Nigerian Voice

If you tell a lie, tell a big one.If you tell a lie long enough, it becomes the truth.

Propaganda works best when those who are being manipulated are confident they are acting on their own free will.

Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Minister of Propaganda, 1933 to 1945

Transhumanism is a set of beliefs based on the premise that human beings can be improved by genetic manipulation and/or implanting technologies into the brain and body to achieve enhanced capacities. Transhumanism has a long history as an idea but since 1990 it has attracted serious attention from an increasing number of technology-lovers and early advocates are readily identified. See What is Transhumanism?

As part of his research as an investigative reporter throughout his life, which included writing a comprehensive expos of how the AIDS hoax was perpetrated in the 1980s, in 2001 Jon Rappoport interviewed a Cold War-era propagandist-turned-anonymous-whistleblower who had spent decades working for the medical and other cartels to promote their agendas to gain increasing control over the human population. Here, in part, is what the propagandist told Rappoport:

Look at the medical cartel. Do they ever declare victory? From now until the end of time theyll be planting stories in the press about the latest medical advance that will make life better for every person in the world. Most of it is a lie, but that doesnt stop them. Until the planet is depopulated down to under a billion people and every one left is a robot, these cartels [elsewhere identified as energy, government, intelligence, media,medical, military,money] are not going to quit. And even then, with a lobotomized world, theyll still push their propaganda. This IS 1984, and people better realize it... The medical cartel. Theyre planning to take over the mind... after which PR wont really matter. [pp.61-62 & 87.]

Thecartels wereusing and creatingandbolstering the Cold War as ameans toanend.Makingwhatyoucouldcall the enemygame apart of the human psycheatsuchalevel that it would maintain itself as a living myththatcouldbe tapped intoatanytimewith any enemies inserted into the lineup.The enemiesgame is as old astimeitself. But this was the version of the moment.To installa rigid sense ofnational security as the overriding fact or that would damn well justifythe deflatingof individual freedom on many fronts. Makenationalsecuritythething youcouldntrefuse. [p.70.]

A: Onceyou fatiguepeopleenough with thestrategies of 1984, they are set up forthemedicalization of society. Which is the brain stuff. The altering of the humanbrainwithdrugs andother approaches. Genes, perhaps. A brainmachinelinkup.Creating a differentperception of reality. Externally appliedelectromagnetic fields.In whichpeoplewill feel happy eventhough they are slaves.Yousee, in 1984 its really all about hysteria. The people are beingdriveninto the wall withlies aboutwars and liesabout enemies and lies about political structure, andthe control overindividuals is very harsh, and the leadersarenotlooking to create real happiness,not the fluffy stuff.Redemption,yes. Forgiveness, perhaps. The people arebeingfed pain and big brother is commandingthem like a drill sergeantthrough their TVsets. Butafter that,after people sink intoanacceptance ofthe delusions thatarebeing foisted on them, then comes the science. Themakingof somekind of replicaofhappiness.The oldorder is1984. Youcan call that thePlan fromthe dawnoftimeto about 1945. After that is the transitionto Brave NewWorld.

Q: Andthats why the medical cartel is the prince of the cartels.

A: Theprince, the king.Q:1984A: Leaves people with no moralconviction. It runsoverthatlike a freighttrain.1984is dark. Brave New World issunny andlight and the control isappliedsothatthe interiorlife changes.

Q: Soyou worked on medical stories.A:Yes. Making the medical cartellookgood, lookhumane,look rational, looklikeexcellent science that works. Especially psychiatryandneurology.Andpharmacology.That became a major job for me. Becausetheyre experimentingonthe human race, and they wanttheir horrible mistakes whicharelegion,tolooklikeadvancesand goodscienceat every stepuntil theyget it right,until theyhave your

brain in their hands fromcradle to grave. [p.71.]

As noted earlier, the words above were penned in 2001. If you would like to read the full transcript of the interview, which offers a reasonably accurate explanation of what is happening around the world at the moment, you can do so in The Matrix Revealed Volume 1, Jon Rappoport Interviews Ellis Medavoy (Part 1 of 3).

And if you would like to read about the AIDS hoax (caused by the non-existent HIV) and how it was done, using much of the same formula being used to perpetrate the elites Covid-19 hoax (caused by the non-existent SARS-CoV-2), you can do so in AIDS Inc.: Scandal of the Century.

Unfortunately, the Covid-19 hoax is being played for stakes that are infinitely higher than they were during the AIDS hoax.

After 200,000 years of Homo Sapiens, the species is about to evolve rapidly and profoundly. But it wont be a natural evolution. And it wont be an improvement unless you dont like the many qualities that make humans human, biologically and socially.

If the transhumanists have their way, individual human identity will vanish along with human volition. Homo Sapiens will be superseded by Homo Cyborg.

If this all sounds like science fiction or just plain ridiculous, let me invite you to consider the evidence below.

As warned by scientist Andrew Herr in an article see This Scientist Wants Tomorrows Troops to Be Mutant-Powered published in 2012:

Greater strength and endurance. Enhanced thinking. Better teamwork. New classes of genetic weaponry, able to subvert DNA. Not long from now, the technology could exist to routinely enhance and undermine peoples minds and bodies using a wide range of chemical, neurological, genetic and behavioral techniques.

Its warfare waged at the evolutionary level. And its coming sooner than many people think.

Well, that time has arrived. The thin edge of the wedge, if we keep allowing it to happen, is the various restrictions and technologies being introduced under cover of Covid-19 which are supposedly being used to tackle the virus.

However, just as in the AIDS epidemic when no (HIV) virus was ever scientifically demonstrated to exist, there is zero science to prove the existence of the virus labeled SARS-CoV-2. Instead, this elite coup is designed and being conducted to achieve a profound transformation in the nature of the human individual and human society, including a substantial depopulation. Moreover, it is proceeding rapidly because it entails a complexity and depth that is not easy to comprehend but also because it seems so preposterous that few people are inclined to contemplate the possibility objectively. Joseph Goebbels knew why. For some of the detail of essential elements of this coup, see Covid-19 Does Not Exist: The Global Elites Campaign of Terror Against Humanity and Halting our Descent into Tyranny: Defeating the Global Elites Covid-19 Coup.

But for another recent comprehensive history and critique of the coup being conducted by the billionaires club, see Dr. Jacob Nordangrds insightful article Analysis: Globalists reboot of the world and their plans for us which opens with the following words:

The Corona crisis is the trigger for a global coup dtat of monumental dimensions. It is the beginning of a new era, with a new international economic order that risks completely destroying human freedoms. Tyrants have now taken over to forcibly steer us into a climate smart and healthy world through the World Economic Forums new techno-totalitarian roadmap The Great Reset.

In this article, however, I want to focus on the agenda of the transhumanists under cover of this coup and what this would mean for Homo Sapiens unless it is stopped.

TechnotyrannyIn one of his videos about the Covid-19 coup watch This Couldnt Possibly Happen. Could it? the transcript for which can be accessed by clicking the Health tab after entering his website the UKs Dr Vernon Coleman explains the sinister agenda of the technological control sought by the transhumanists:

If you were a mad doctor and you wanted to control an individual it would be a doddle.

Youd just tell them you were giving them an injection to protect them against the flu or something like that and in the syringe there would be a little receiver. And then youd stick a transmitter on the roof of the house across the road from where they lived.

And then you could send messages to make them do whatever you wanted them to do. You could make them sad or angry or happy or contented. You could make them run or fight or just spend all day in bed.

Remember, thats what Dr Delgado was doing over half a century ago. Its nothing new.

Of course, if you wanted to do the same thing for lots of people youd need a whole lot of people to help you.

And youd need something to inject into people. A medicine of some kind for example.

And then youd need someone good at software to help with all the transmitting and the receiving and youd need people with access to lots of tall poles or roofs where they could put the transmitter things.

But none of that would be any good unless you had a reason for injecting people. You cant just go around injecting millions of people for no reason.

Ideally, youd need them all to be frightened of something so that they were keen to let you inject them. And then you could put your tiny receivers into the stuff that was being injected. Or squirted up their noses or whatever.

Introducing her own careful explanation of the agenda of the transhumanists, in her video Dr. Carrie Madej opens with the following words:

So what do you think about going from human 1.0 to human 2.0?... Transhumanism is about taking humans, as we know ourselves, and melding with artificial intelligence. That might seem kinda cool to you, we might have some superhuman abilities thats the idea, thats what you see in sci-fi movies Thinking about this topic... I [had thought that it was] many years in the future.

However, this question, this idea is now right in this moment. We need to make a decision... because I investigated the proposed Covid-19 vaccine and this is my alarm call to the world. I looked at the pros and cons and it frightens me.

And I want you to know about this, you need to be very well informed because this new vaccine is not like your normal flu vaccine. This is something very different, this is something brand new, something completely experimental on the human race. And its not just about being a different vaccine. There are technologies that are being introduced with this vaccine that can change the way we live, who we are and what we are. And very quickly.

Some people... like Elon Musk, who is the founder of SpaceX and Tesla Automotive, as well as Ray Kurzweil, who is one of the bigwigs of Google, are self-proclaimed transhumanists. They believe that we should go to human 2.0 and they are very big proponents of this. Theres a lot of other people... involved with this. I think the easiest way to explain this to you is to go with one of the frontrunners for the vaccine and go into a little bit of the history and tell you how they want to make the vaccine and I think that will speak volumes. So, for instance, Moderna is one of the frontrunners for the Covid-19 vaccine. Watch Human 2.0 Transhumanist Vaccine A Wake Up Call to the World.

If you doubt the capacity of medicine to achieve this level of human transformation, in this video produced in August 2020, transhumanist Elon Musk explains how his Neuralink microchip will be surgically implanted into the human brain, as has already been done with animals. While he specifically mentions the chips capacity to monitor certain health parameters and to play you music, he does not mention its intended uses for digitization of your identity, recording of your personal data such as medical and bank records, any of its surveillance functions or its capacity for emotional, thought and behavioural control. Watch This Is How Elon Musks Neuralink Microchip Will Be Put In Your Brain.

As Raul Diego explains in his own article on this subject:

The most significant scientific discovery since gravity has been hiding in plain sight for nearly a decade and its destructive potential to humanity is so enormous that the biggest war machine on the planet immediately deployed its vast resources to possess and control it, financing its research and development through agencies like the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and HHS Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA).

The revolutionary breakthrough [involved devising] a way to reprogram the molecules that carry the genetic instructions for cell development in the human body, not to mention all biological lifeforms.

These molecules are called messenger ribonucleic acid or mRNA and the newfound ability to rewrite those instructions to produce any kind of cell within a biological organism has radically changed the course of Western medicine and science, even if no one has really noticed yet. As [inventor, Professor Derek] Rossi, himself, puts it: The real important discovery here was you could now use mRNA, and if you got it into the cells, then you could get the mRNA to express any protein in the cells, and this was the big thing. See A Transhumanist Dream: A DARPA-Funded Implantable Biochip to Detect COVID-19 Could Hit Markets by 2021.

Moreover, as Patrick Wood, who has intensively studied and reported the efforts of the transhumanists for decades, explains in a recent article The Siamese Twins of Technocracy and Transhumanism and discusses in a related video Humans 2.0: GMO Vaccinations and Transhumanism that draws out some of the more nuanced elements of their agenda:

Technocracy and Transhumanism have always been joined at the hip. Technocracy uses its science of social engineering to merge technology and society. Transhumanism uses its field of NBIC to merge technology directly into humans. To put it another way, Technocracy is to society what Transhumanism is to the humans that live in it.

NBIC stands for Nano (nano-technology), Bio (bio-technology), Info (information technology) and Cogno (cognitive sciences). These four scientific disciplines remained separate avenues of study in Universities around the world until the early 1970s. Today, NBIC has become an established discipline of its own in most major universities with personnel contributed from each separate department.

All together, NBIC offers a scientific cauldron to Transhumans in their quest to create Humans 2.0.

Its also no wonder that the upcoming vaccine for COVID-19 being produced by Moderna is also using NBIC science to accomplish a merging of the human body with advanced technology. The Trump Administration has contracted with Moderna see Trump Administration collaborates with Moderna to produce 100 million doses of COVID-19 investigational vaccine to deliver 100 million doses of its investigational vaccine, ostensibly to be kitted and transported to the nation by the U.S. Military.

[Technocracy and Transhumanism are both] extremely dangerous for all of humankind and must be rejected before it is too late to stop them.

And Whitney Webb provides further insight into the elite intention in this regard. In one of her meticulously-researched articles Coronavirus Gives a Dangerous Boost to DARPAs Darkest Agenda she outlines the hidden technological agenda behind the Covid-19 coup that might well be delivered as part of any vaccination program by the Pentagons Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). After carefully outlining the history and logic of what is taking place such as the development of cyborg super soldiers and injectable Brain Machine Interfaces (BMIs) with the capability to control ones thoughts she concludes with the chilling words:

Technology developed by the Pentagons controversial research branch is getting a huge boost amid the current coronavirus crisis, with little attention going to the agencys ulterior motives for developing said technologies, their potential for weaponization or their unintended consequences.

Those who are fearful and desperate will not care that the vaccine may include nanotechnology or have the potential to genetically modify and re-program their very being, as they will only want the current crisis that has upended the world to stop.

In this context, the current coronavirus crisis appears to be the perfect storm that will allow DARPAs dystopian vision to take hold and burst forth from the darkest recesses of the Pentagon into full public view. DARPAs transhumanist vision for the military and for humanity presents an unprecedented threat, not just to human freedom, but an existential threat to human existence and the building blocks of biology itself.

Of course, if you want to read how involved corporations, DARPA and other elite agencies explain it, you can do so. But unless you dig beneath the surface you will only get their sanitized accounts which, just like Elon Musk, focus on seemingly benign elements like digitized identity and health reporting while not mentioning the technologys capacities and intended uses for the invasion of your privacy, the recording of your personal data such as medical and bank records, any of its surveillance functions or its capacity for emotional, thought and behavioural control. See, for example, Modernas mRNA Technology, Profusa is pioneering tissue-integrating biosensors for continuous monitoring of body chemistries, A Military-Funded Biosensor Could Be the Future of Pandemic Detection (which discusses the role of hydrogel) and DARPAS Developing novel, safe and efficacious treatments for COVID-19 following its much earlier In Vivo Nanoplatforms (IVN). For two elite presentations of the importance of your digital identity, see The Need for Good Digital ID is Universal and ID2020 and partners launch program to provide digital ID with vaccines.

What is at Stake?As discussed above, the technology now available after decades of effort enables receiver nanochips to be sprayed, injected or otherwise implanted into human bodies. With the ongoing deployment of 5G (which includes extensive space and ground-based technologies: see Deadly Rainbow: Will 5G Precipitate the Extinction of All Life on Earth?), just one outcome of these combined technologies is that it will be possible to direct the individual behaviour of each person so implanted. Given that the control technology will be owned by corporate executives, here is a list of examples of how the elite might direct that it be used (more or less as a drone pilot sitting in the United States controls a drone flying in the Middle East that fires weapons on local people):

1. The official chain of command to launch nuclear weapons can be subverted by using remote control to direct the chosen individual in a particular chain of command to order (or execute) the launch of one or more nuclear weapons at the target(s) nominated at the time(s) specified. Subordinates can be directed to follow orders they might otherwise question.

2. Cyborg soldiers (either as mercenaries or as members of national military forces) in groups or as individuals can be deployed anywhere to fight as ordered by those in charge of their remote controls.

3. Cyborg workers can be directed to work in dangerous conditions for extended periods and simply be replaced as required. Someone else nearby will have been vaccinated too and can be directed to take their place.

4. Cyborg consumers can be directed to purchase a particular product, irrespective of its functionality, including health or otherwise, for the person so directed. That is assuming that money is not just taken directly from their bank account, given that it will no longer be under their exclusive control.

5. Cyborg activists on any issue can simply to be directed to refrain from further involvement in their campaign. Or to actively take the opposite position to the one they had previously.

What can we do to halt this transhumanist agenda and the elite coup itself?

Fortunately, we can do a great deal.For a detailed series of options on how to have strategic impact, see the end of the article Ye are Many, They are Few: Nonviolent Resistance to the Elites Covid-19 Coup.

Importantly, however, if you would like to be part of the campaign to defeat the elite coup and prevent implementation of the transhumanist agenda, see the list of strategic goals necessary to achieve these outcomes here: Coup Strategic Aims.

If you wish to nurture children to be far more able to critique society and elite propaganda, rather than be easily duped, see My Promise to Children.

If you wish to reduce your vulnerability to elite control, consider joining those who recognize the critical importance of reduced consumption and greater self-reliance by participating in The Flame Tree Project to Save Life on Earth. In addition, you are welcome to consider signing the online pledge of The Peoples Charter to Create a Nonviolent World.

Finally, if you want a better fundamental understanding of how we reached this point, see Why Violence?, Fearless Psychology and Fearful Psychology: Principles and Practice and The Global Elite is Insane Revisited.

ConclusionIn the elegant words of South African liberation activist Steve Biko:

The most potent weapon of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed.

When he uttered these words before being tortured to death in an Apartheid prison, Biko presumably did not realize the profound meaning they would acquire in 2020.

The transhuman mind will be owned and controlled by the oppressor.

If we are to avert this fate, we must struggle with clarity and purpose.

Biodata: Robert J. Burrowes has a lifetime commitment to understanding and ending human violence. He has done extensive research since 1966 in an effort to understand why human beings are violent and has been a nonviolent activist since 1981. He is the author of Why Violence? His email address is [emailprotected] and his website is here.

See the original post here:
Beware The Transhumanists: How 'being Human' Is Being Re-engineered By The Elite's Covid-19 Coup - The Nigerian Voice

Posted in Transhumanism | Comments Off on Beware The Transhumanists: How ‘being Human’ Is Being Re-engineered By The Elite’s Covid-19 Coup – The Nigerian Voice

Futures studies – Wikipedia

Futures studies (also called futurology) is the study of postulating possible, probable, and preferable futures and the worldviews and myths that underlie them. There is a debate as to whether this discipline is an art or science. In general, it can be considered as a branch of the social sciences and parallel to the field of history. History studies the past, futures studies considers the future. Futures studies (colloquially called "futures" by many of the field's practitioners) seeks to understand what is likely to continue and what could plausibly change. Part of the discipline thus seeks a systematic and pattern-based understanding of past and present, and to determine the likelihood of future events and trends.[1] Unlike the physical sciences where a narrower, more specified system is studied, futures studies concerns a much bigger and more complex world system. The methodology and knowledge are much less proven as compared to natural science or even social science like sociology, economics, and political science.

Futures studies is an interdisciplinary field, studying yesterday's and today's changes, and aggregating and analyzing both lay and professional strategies and opinions with respect to tomorrow. It includes analyzing the sources, patterns, and causes of change and stability in an attempt to develop foresight and to map possible futures. Around the world the field is variously referred to as futures studies, strategic foresight, futuristics, futures thinking, futuring, and futurology. Futures studies and strategic foresight are the academic field's most commonly used terms in the English-speaking world.

Foresight was the original term and was first used in this sense by H.G. Wells in 1932.[2] "Futurology" is a term common in encyclopedias, though it is used almost exclusively by nonpractitioners today, at least in the English-speaking world. "Futurology" is defined as the "study of the future."[3] The term was coined by German professor Ossip K. Flechtheim in the mid-1940s, who proposed it as a new branch of knowledge that would include a new science of probability. This term may have fallen from favor in recent decades because modern practitioners stress the importance of alternative and plural futures, rather than one monolithic future, and the limitations of prediction and probability, versus the creation of possible and preferable futures.[citation needed]

Three factors usually distinguish futures studies from the research conducted by other disciplines (although all of these disciplines overlap, to differing degrees). First, futures studies often examines not only possible but also probable, preferable, and "wild card" futures. Second, futures studies typically attempts to gain a holistic or systemic view based on insights from a range of different disciplines. Third, futures studies challenges and unpacks the assumptions behind dominant and contending views of the future. The future thus is not empty but fraught with hidden assumptions. For example, many people expect the collapse of the Earth's ecosystem in the near future, while others believe the current ecosystem will survive indefinitely. A foresight approach would seek to analyze and highlight the assumptions underpinning such views.

Futures studies does not generally focus on short term predictions such as interest rates over the next business cycle, or of managers or investors with short-term time horizons. Most strategic planning, which develops operational plans for preferred futures with time horizons of one to three years, is also not considered futures. Plans and strategies with longer time horizons that specifically attempt to anticipate possible future events are definitely part of the field.

The futures field also excludes those who make future predictions through professed supernatural means. At the same time, it does seek to understand the models such groups use and the interpretations they give to these models.

Johan Galtung and Sohail Inayatullah[4] argue in Macrohistory and Macrohistorians that the search for grand patterns of social change goes all the way back to Ssu-Ma Chien (145-90BC) and his theory of the cycles of virtue, although the work of Ibn Khaldun (13321406) such as The Muqaddimah[5] would be an example that is perhaps more intelligible to modern sociology. Some intellectual foundations of futures studies appeared in the mid-19th century; according to Wendell Bell, Comte's discussion of the metapatterns of social change presages futures studies as a scholarly dialogue.[6]

The first works that attempt to make systematic predictions for the future were written in the 18th century. Memoirs of the Twentieth Century written by Samuel Madden in 1733, takes the form of a series of diplomatic letters written in 1997 and 1998 from British representatives in the foreign cities of Constantinople, Rome, Paris, and Moscow.[7] However, the technology of the 20th century is identical to that of Madden's own era - the focus is instead on the political and religious state of the world in the future. Madden went on to write The Reign of George VI, 1900 to 1925, where (in the context of the boom in canal construction at the time) he envisioned a large network of waterways that would radically transform patterns of living - "Villages grew into towns and towns became cities".[8]

The genre of science fiction became established towards the end of the 19th century, with notable writers, including Jules Verne and H. G. Wells, setting their stories in an imagined future world.

According to W. Warren Wagar, the founder of future studies was H. G. Wells. His Anticipations of the Reaction of Mechanical and Scientific Progress Upon Human Life and Thought: An Experiment in Prophecy, was first serially published in The Fortnightly Review in 1901.[9] Anticipating what the world would be like in the year 2000, the book is interesting both for its hits (trains and cars resulting in the dispersion of population from cities to suburbs; moral restrictions declining as men and women seek greater sexual freedom; the defeat of German militarism, the existence of a European Union, and a world order maintained by "English-speaking peoples" based on the urban core between Chicago and New York[10]) and its misses (he did not expect successful aircraft before 1950, and averred that "my imagination refuses to see any sort of submarine doing anything but suffocate its crew and founder at sea").[11][12]

Moving from narrow technological predictions, Wells envisioned the eventual collapse of the capitalist world system after a series of destructive total wars. From this havoc would ultimately emerge a world of peace and plenty, controlled by competent technocrats.[9]

The work was a bestseller, and Wells was invited to deliver a lecture at the Royal Institution in 1902, entitled The Discovery of the Future. The lecture was well-received and was soon republished in book form. He advocated for the establishment of a new academic study of the future that would be grounded in scientific methodology rather than just speculation. He argued that a scientifically ordered vision of the future "will be just as certain, just as strictly science, and perhaps just as detailed as the picture that has been built up within the last hundred years to make the geological past." Although conscious of the difficulty in arriving at entirely accurate predictions, he thought that it would still be possible to arrive at a "working knowledge of things in the future".[9]

In his fictional works, Wells predicted the invention and use of the atomic bomb in The World Set Free (1914).[13] In The Shape of Things to Come (1933) the impending World War and cities destroyed by aerial bombardment was depicted.[14] However, he didn't stop advocating for the establishment of a futures science. In a 1933 BBC broadcast he called for the establishment of "Departments and Professors of Foresight", foreshadowing the development of modern academic futures studies by approximately 40 years.[2]

Futures studies emerged as an academic discipline in the mid-1960s. First-generation futurists included Herman Kahn, an American Cold War strategist who wrote On Thermonuclear War (1960), Thinking about the unthinkable (1962) and The Year 2000: a framework for speculation on the next thirty-three years (1967); Bertrand de Jouvenel, a French economist who founded Futuribles International in 1960; and Dennis Gabor, a Hungarian-British scientist who wrote Inventing the Future (1963) and The Mature Society. A View of the Future (1972).[6]

Future studies had a parallel origin with the birth of systems science in academia, and with the idea of national economic and political planning, most notably in France and the Soviet Union.[6][15] In the 1950s, France was continuing to reconstruct their war-torn country. In the process, French scholars, philosophers, writers, and artists searched for what could constitute a more positive future for humanity. The Soviet Union similarly participated in postwar rebuilding, but did so in the context of an established national economic planning process, which also required a long-term, systemic statement of social goals. Future studies was therefore primarily engaged in national planning, and the construction of national symbols.

By contrast, in the United States, futures studies as a discipline emerged from the successful application of the tools and perspectives of systems analysis, especially with regard to quartermastering the war-effort. These differing origins account for an initial schism between futures studies in America and futures studies in Europe: U.S. practitioners focused on applied projects, quantitative tools and systems analysis, whereas Europeans preferred to investigate the long-range future of humanity and the Earth, what might constitute that future, what symbols and semantics might express it, and who might articulate these.[16][17]

By the 1960s, academics, philosophers, writers and artists across the globe had begun to explore enough future scenarios so as to fashion a common dialogue. Inventors such as Buckminster Fuller also began highlighting the effect technology might have on global trends as time progressed. This discussion on the intersection of population growth, resource availability and use, economic growth, quality of life, and environmental sustainability referred to as the "global problematique" came to wide public attention with the publication of Limits to Growth, a study sponsored by the Club of Rome.[18]

International dialogue became institutionalized in the form of the World Futures Studies Federation (WFSF), founded in 1967, with the noted sociologist, Johan Galtung, serving as its first president. In the United States, the publisher Edward Cornish, concerned with these issues, started the World Future Society, an organization focused more on interested laypeople.

1975 saw the founding of the first graduate program in futures studies in the United States, the M.S. program in Futures Studies at the University of HoustonClear Lake,.[19] Oliver Markley of SRI (now SRI International) was hired in 1978 to move the program into a more applied and professional direction. The program moved to the University of Houston in 2007 and renamed the degree to Foresight.[20] In 1976, the M.A. Program in Public Policy in Alternative Futures at the University of Hawaii at Manoa was established.[21] The Hawaii program locates futures studies within a pedagogical space defined by neo-Marxism, critical political economic theory, and literary criticism. In the years following the foundation of these two programs, single courses in Futures Studies at all levels of education have proliferated, but complete programs occur only rarely. In 2012, the Finland Futures Research Centre started a master's degree Programme in Futures Studies at Turku School of Economics, a business school which is part of the University of Turku in Turku, Finland.[22]

As a transdisciplinary field, futures studies attracts generalists. This transdisciplinary nature can also cause problems, owing to it sometimes falling between the cracks of disciplinary boundaries; it also has caused some difficulty in achieving recognition within the traditional curricula of the sciences and the humanities. In contrast to "Futures Studies" at the undergraduate level, some graduate programs in strategic leadership or management offer masters or doctorate programs in "strategic foresight" for mid-career professionals, some even online. Nevertheless, comparatively few new PhDs graduate in Futures Studies each year.

The field currently faces the great challenge of creating a coherent conceptual framework, codified into a well-documented curriculum (or curricula) featuring widely accepted and consistent concepts and theoretical paradigms linked to quantitative and qualitative methods, exemplars of those research methods, and guidelines for their ethical and appropriate application within society. As an indication that previously disparate intellectual dialogues have in fact started converging into a recognizable discipline,[23] at least six solidly-researched and well-accepted first attempts to synthesize a coherent framework for the field have appeared: Eleonora Masini's Why Futures Studies,[24]James Dator's Advancing Futures Studies,[25]Ziauddin Sardar's Rescuing all of our Futures,[26]Sohail Inayatullah's Questioning the future,[27]Richard A. Slaughter's The Knowledge Base of Futures Studies,[28] a collection of essays by senior practitioners, and Wendell Bell's two-volume work, The Foundations of Futures Studies.[29]

Some aspects of the future, such as celestial mechanics, are highly predictable, and may even be described by relatively simple mathematical models. At present however, science has yielded only a special minority of such "easy to predict" physical processes. Theories such as chaos theory, nonlinear science and standard evolutionary theory have allowed us to understand many complex systems as contingent (sensitively dependent on complex environmental conditions) and stochastic (random within constraints), making the vast majority of future events unpredictable, in any specific case.

Not surprisingly, the tension between predictability and unpredictability is a source of controversy and conflict among futures studies scholars and practitioners. Some argue that the future is essentially unpredictable, and that "the best way to predict the future is to create it." Others believe, as Flechtheim, that advances in science, probability, modeling and statistics will allow us to continue to improve our understanding of probable futures, while this area presently remains less well developed than methods for exploring possible and preferable futures.

As an example, consider the process of electing the president of the United States. At one level we observe that any U.S. citizen over 35 may run for president, so this process may appear too unconstrained for useful prediction. Yet further investigation demonstrates that only certain public individuals (current and former presidents and vice presidents, senators, state governors, popular military commanders, mayors of very large cities, etc.) receive the appropriate "social credentials" that are historical prerequisites for election. Thus with a minimum of effort at formulating the problem for statistical prediction, a much reduced pool of candidates can be described, improving our probabilistic foresight. Applying further statistical intelligence to this problem, we can observe that in certain election prediction markets such as the Iowa Electronic Markets, reliable forecasts have been generated over long spans of time and conditions, with results superior to individual experts or polls. Such markets, which may be operated publicly or as an internal market, are just one of several promising frontiers in predictive futures research.

Such improvements in the predictability of individual events do not though, from a complexity theory viewpoint, address the unpredictability inherent in dealing with entire systems, which emerge from the interaction between multiple individual events.

Futures practitioners use a wide range of models and methods (theory and practice), many of which come from other academic disciplines, including economics, sociology, geography, history, engineering, mathematics, psychology, technology, tourism, physics, biology, astronomy, and aspects of theology (specifically, the range of future beliefs).

One of the fundamental assumptions in futures studies is that the future is plural not singular, that is, that it consists of alternative futures of varying likelihood but that it is impossible in principle to say with certainty which one will occur. The primary effort in futures studies, therefore, is to identify and describe alternative futures. This effort includes collecting quantitative and qualitative data about the possibility, probability, and desirability of change. The plurality of the term "futures" in futures studies denotes the rich variety of alternative futures, including the subset of preferable futures (normative futures), that can be studied.

Practitioners of the discipline previously concentrated on extrapolating present technological, economic or social trends, or on attempting to predict future trends, but more recently they have started to examine social systems and uncertainties and to build scenarios, question the worldviews behind such scenarios via the causal layered analysis method (and others), create preferred visions of the future, and use backcasting to derive alternative implementation strategies. Apart from extrapolation and scenarios, many dozens of methods and techniques are used in futures research (see below).

Futures studies also includes normative or preferred futures, but a major contribution involves connecting both extrapolated (exploratory) and normative research to help individuals and organisations to build better social futures amid a (presumed) landscape of shifting social changes. Practitioners use varying proportions of inspiration and research. Futures studies only rarely uses the scientific method in the sense of controlled, repeatable and falsifiable experiments with highly standardized methodologies, given that environmental conditions for repeating a predictive scheme are usually quite hard to control. However, many futurists are informed by scientific techniques. Some historians project patterns observed in past civilizations upon present-day society to anticipate what will happen in the future. Oswald Spengler's "Decline of the West" argued,[full citation needed] for instance, that western society, like imperial Rome, had reached a stage of cultural maturity that would inexorably lead to decline, in measurable ways.

Futures studies is often summarized as being concerned with "three Ps and a W", or possible, probable, and preferable futures, plus wildcards, which are low probability but high impact events (positive or negative), should they occur. Many futurists, however, do not use the wild card approach. Rather, they use a methodology called Emerging Issues Analysis. It searches for the seeds of change, issues that are likely to move from unknown to the known, from low impact to high impact.

Estimates of probability are involved with two of the four central concerns of foresight professionals (discerning and classifying both probable and wildcard events), while considering the range of possible futures, recognizing the plurality of existing alternative futures, characterizing and attempting to resolve normative disagreements on the future, and envisioning and creating preferred futures are other major areas of scholarship. Most estimates of probability in futures studies are normative and qualitative, though significant progress on statistical and quantitative methods (technology and information growth curves, cliometrics, predictive psychology, prediction markets, crowdvoting forecasts,[30][bettersourceneeded] etc.) has been made in recent decades.

While forecasting i.e., attempts to predict future states from current trends is a common methodology, professional scenarios often rely on "backcasting": asking what changes in the present would be required to arrive at envisioned alternative future states. For example, the Policy Reform and Eco-Communalism scenarios developed by the Global Scenario Group rely on the backcasting method. Practitioners of futures studies classify themselves as futurists (or foresight practitioners).

Futurists use a diverse range of forecasting methods including:

Futurists use scenarios alternative possible futures as an important tool. To some extent, people can determine what they consider probable or desirable using qualitative and quantitative methods. By looking at a variety of possibilities one comes closer to shaping the future, rather than merely predicting it. Shaping alternative futures starts by establishing a number of scenarios. Setting up scenarios takes place as a process with many stages. One of those stages involves the study of trends. A trend persists long-term and long-range; it affects many societal groups, grows slowly and appears to have a profound basis. In contrast, a fad operates in the short term, shows the vagaries of fashion, affects particular societal groups, and spreads quickly but superficially.

Sample predicted futures range from predicted ecological catastrophes, through a utopian future where the poorest human being lives in what present-day observers would regard as wealth and comfort, through the transformation of humanity into a posthuman life-form, to the destruction of all life on Earth in, say, a nanotechnological disaster.

Futurists have a decidedly mixed reputation and a patchy track record at successful prediction. For reasons of convenience, they often extrapolate present technical and societal trends and assume they will develop at the same rate into the future; but technical progress and social upheavals, in reality, take place in fits and starts and in different areas at different rates.

Many 1950s futurists predicted commonplace space tourism by the year 2000, but ignored the possibilities of ubiquitous, cheap computers. On the other hand, many forecasts have portrayed the future with some degree of accuracy. Current futurists often present multiple scenarios that help their audience envision what "may" occur instead of merely "predicting the future". They claim that understanding potential scenarios helps individuals and organizations prepare with flexibility.

Many corporations use futurists as part of their risk management strategy, for horizon scanning and emerging issues analysis, and to identify wild cards low probability, potentially high-impact risks.[31] Every successful and unsuccessful business engages in futuring to some degree for example in research and development, innovation and market research, anticipating competitor behavior and so on.[32][33]

In futures research "weak signals" may be understood as advanced, noisy and socially situated indicators of change in trends and systems that constitute raw informational material for enabling anticipatory action. There is some confusion about the definition of weak signal by various researchers and consultants. Sometimes it is referred as future oriented information, sometimes more like emerging issues. The confusion has been partly clarified with the concept 'the future sign', by separating signal, issue and interpretation of the future sign.[34]

"Wild cards" refer to low-probability and high-impact events, such as existential risks. This concept may be embedded in standard foresight projects and introduced into anticipatory decision-making activity in order to increase the ability of social groups adapt to surprises arising in turbulent business environments. Such sudden and unique incidents might constitute turning points in the evolution of a certain trend or system. Wild cards may or may not be announced by weak signals, which are incomplete and fragmented data from which relevant foresight information might be inferred. Sometimes, mistakenly, wild cards and weak signals are considered as synonyms, which they are not.[35]

A long-running tradition in various cultures, and especially in the media, involves various spokespersons making predictions for the upcoming year at the beginning of the year. These predictions sometimes base themselves on current trends in culture (music, movies, fashion, politics); sometimes they make hopeful guesses as to what major events might take place over the course of the next year.

Some of these predictions come true as the year unfolds, though many fail. When predicted events fail to take place, the authors of the predictions often state that misinterpretation of the "signs" and portents may explain the failure of the prediction.

Marketers have increasingly started to embrace futures studies, in an effort to benefit from an increasingly competitive marketplace with fast production cycles, using such techniques as trendspotting as popularized by Faith Popcorn.[dubious discuss]

Trends come in different sizes. A mega-trend extends over many generations, and in cases of climate, mega-trends can cover periods prior to human existence. They describe complex interactions between many factors. The increase in population from the palaeolithic period to the present provides an example.

Possible new trends grow from innovations, projects, beliefs or actions that have the potential to grow and eventually go mainstream in the future.

Very often, trends relate to one another the same way as a tree-trunk relates to branches and twigs. For example, a well-documented movement toward equality between men and women might represent a branch trend. The trend toward reducing differences in the salaries of men and women in the Western world could form a twig on that branch.

When a potential trend gets enough confirmation in the various media, surveys or questionnaires to show that it has an increasingly accepted value, behavior or technology, it becomes accepted as a bona fide trend. Trends can also gain confirmation by the existence of other trends perceived as springing from the same branch. Some commentators claim that when 15% to 25% of a given population integrates an innovation, project, belief or action into their daily life then a trend becomes mainstream.

Because new advances in technology have the potential to reshape our society, one of the jobs of a futurist is to follow these developments and consider their implications. However, the latest innovations take time to make an impact. Every new technology goes through its own life cycle of maturity, adoption, and social application that must be taken into consideration before a probable vision of the future can be created.

Gartner created their Hype Cycle to illustrate the phases a technology moves through as it grows from research and development to mainstream adoption. The unrealistic expectations and subsequent disillusionment that virtual reality experienced in the 1990s and early 2000s is an example of the middle phases encountered before a technology can begin to be integrated into society.[36]

Education in the field of futures studies has taken place for some time. Beginning in the United States of America in the 1960s, it has since developed in many different countries. Futures education can encourage the use of concepts, tools and processes that allow students to think long-term, consequentially, and imaginatively. It generally helps students to:

Thorough documentation of the history of futures education exists, for example in the work of Richard A. Slaughter (2004),[37] David Hicks, Ivana Milojevi[38] to name a few.

While futures studies remains a relatively new academic tradition, numerous tertiary institutions around the world teach it. These vary from small programs, or universities with just one or two classes, to programs that incorporate futures studies into other degrees, (for example in planning, business, environmental studies, economics, development studies, science and technology studies). Various formal Masters-level programs exist on six continents. Finally, doctoral dissertations around the world have incorporated futures studies. A recent survey documented approximately 50 cases of futures studies at the tertiary level.[39]

The largest Futures Studies program in the world is at Tamkang University, Taiwan.[citation needed] Futures Studies is a required course at the undergraduate level, with between three and five thousand students taking classes on an annual basis. Housed in the Graduate Institute of Futures Studies is an MA Program. Only ten students are accepted annually in the program. Associated with the program is the Journal of Futures Studies.[40]

The longest running Future Studies program in North America was established in 1975 at the University of HoustonClear Lake.[41] It moved to the University of Houston in 2007 and renamed the degree to Foresight. The program was established on the belief that if history is studied and taught in an academic setting, then so should the future. Its mission is to prepare professional futurists. The curriculum incorporates a blend of the essential theory, a framework and methods for doing the work, and a focus on application for clients in business, government, nonprofits, and society in general.[42]

As of 2003, over 40 tertiary education establishments around the world were delivering one or more courses in futures studies. The World Futures Studies Federation[43] has a comprehensive survey of global futures programs and courses. The Acceleration Studies Foundation maintains an annotated list of primary and secondary graduate futures studies programs.[44]

Organizations such as Teach The Future also aim to promote future studies in the secondary school curriculum in order to develop structured approaches to thinking about the future in public school students. The rationale is that a sophisticated approach to thinking about, anticipating, and planning for the future is a core skill requirement that every student should have, similar to literacy and math skills.

Several authors have become recognized as futurists. They research trends, particularly in technology, and write their observations, conclusions, and predictions. In earlier eras, many futurists were at academic institutions. John McHale, author of The Future of the Future, published a 'Futures Directory', and directed a think tank called The Centre For Integrative Studies at a university. Futurists have started consulting groups or earn money as speakers, with examples including Alvin Toffler, John Naisbitt and Patrick Dixon. Frank Feather is a business speaker that presents himself as a pragmatic futurist. Some futurists have commonalities with science fiction, and some science-fiction writers, such as Arthur C. Clarke, are known as futurists.[citation needed] In the introduction to The Left Hand of Darkness, Ursula K. Le Guin distinguished futurists from novelists, writing of the study as the business of prophets, clairvoyants, and futurists. In her words, "a novelist's business is lying".

A survey of 108 futurists found that they share a variety of assumptions, including in their description of the present as a critical moment in an historical transformation, in their recognition and belief in complexity, and in their being motivated by change and having a desire for an active role bringing change (versus simply being involved in forecasting).[45]

Several corporations and government agencies utilize foresight products to both better understand potential risks and prepare for potential opportunities. Several government agencies publish material for internal stakeholders as well as make that material available to broader public. Examples of this include the US Congressional Budget Office long term budget projections,[46] the National Intelligence Center,[47] and the United Kingdom Government Office for Science.[48] Much of this material is used by policy makers to inform policy decisions and government agencies to develop long term plan. Several corporations, particularly those with long product development lifecycles, utilize foresight and future studies products and practitioners in the development of their business strategies. The Shell Corporation is one such entity.[49] Foresight professionals and their tools are increasingly being utilized in both the private and public areas to help leaders deal with an increasingly complex and interconnected world.

Fashion is one area of trend forecasting. The industry typically works 18 months ahead of the current selling season.[citation needed] Large retailers look at the obvious impact of everything from the weather forecast to runway fashion for consumer tastes. Consumer behavior and statistics are also important for a long-range forecast.

Artists and conceptual designers, by contrast, may feel that consumer trends are a barrier to creativity. Many of these startists start micro trends but do not follow trends themselves.[citation needed]

Design is another area of trend forecasting. Foresight and futures thinking are rapidly being adopted by the design industry to insure more sustainable, robust and humanistic products. Design, much like future studies is an interdisciplinary field that considers global trends, challenges and opportunities to foster innovation. Designers are thus adopting futures methodologies including scenarios, trend forecasting, and futures research.

Holistic thinking that incorporates strategic, innovative and anticipatory solutions gives designers the tools necessary to navigate complex problems and develop novel future enhancing and visionary solutions.

The Association for Professional Futurists has also held meetings discussing the ways in which Design Thinking and Futures Thinking intersect.

The future of energy is a complex topic. There are likely not enough new sources of oil in the Earth to make up for escalating demands from China, India, Africa, and other rapidly developing economies, and to replace declining fields, if future energy consumption patterns of these economies mimic the historical patterns of the developed world. Yet as global population saturates and we move further into the Information Age, energy intensity (use of energy per GDP) has been saturating (slowing in rate of growth) or declining in many countries.[50] There are also over a trillion and a half barrels of proven oil reserves in the world,[51] in the hands of owners who want to make sure as much of that oil is sold as possible before we move to alternative sources. They have a strong incentive to keep the price of oil low enough (e.g., below $100 a barrel) to discourage too-rapid emergence of viable alternatives. While many alternative sources of energy exist, their rate of development and their levels of governmental and corporate R&D funding remain slow and low. Some futurists see a gap looming between the effective end of the Age of Oil and the expected emergence of new energy sources.[52] Others see no such gap ahead, and expect we'll leave the Age of Oil to one led by solar, fusion, natural gas, and other sources with lots of oil still remaining in the ground. Social values changes, climate change, accelerating computerization and machine productivity, and other factors may increasingly drive us to more sustainable energy sources with significantly fewer environmental and public health costs than oil and coal.[53][54]

Imperial cycles represent an "expanding pulsation" of "mathematically describable" macro-historic trend.[55] The List of Largest Empires contains imperial record progression in terms of territory or percentage of world population under single imperial rule.

Chinese philosopher K'ang Yu-wei and French demographer Georges Vacher de Lapouge in the late 19th century were the first to stress that the trend cannot proceed indefinitely on the definite surface of the globe. The trend is bound to culminate in a world empire. K'ang Yu-wei estimated that the matter will be decided in the contest between Washington and Berlin; Vacher de Lapouge foresaw this contest between the United States and Russia and estimated the chance of the United States higher.[56] Both published their futures studies before H. G. Wells introduced the science of future in his Anticipations (1901).

Four later anthropologistsHornell Hart, Raoul Naroll, Louis Morano, and Robert Carneiroresearched the expanding imperial cycles. They reached the same conclusion that a world empire is not only pre-determined but close at hand and attempted to estimate the time of its appearance.[57]

Historian Max Ostrovsky, specializing on macro-historic trends and their projection into future, analyzed the inner mechanism at work in the process and applied the results to the conditions of the global system. The work confirmed the inexorable trend towards a world empire. He found that the development of the world order in history and its projection into future follows a hyperbolic trajectory. The research was published in 2007 titled: Y = Arctg X: The Hyperbola of the World Order.[58]

As Foresight has expanded to include a broader range of social concerns all levels and types of education have been addressed, including formal and informal education. Many countries are beginning to implement Foresight in their Education policy. A few programs are listed below:

Wendell Bell and Ed Cornish acknowledge science fiction as a catalyst to future studies, conjuring up visions of tomorrow.[61] Science fictions potential to provide an imaginative social vision is its contribution to futures studies and public perspective. Productive sci-fi presents plausible, normative scenarios.[61] Jim Dator attributes the foundational concepts of images of the future to Wendell Bell, for clarifying Fred Polaks concept in Images of the Future, as it applies to futures studies.[62][63] Similar to futures studies scenarios thinking, empirically supported visions of the future are a window into what the future could be. Pamela Sargent states, Science fiction reflects attitudes typical of this century. She gives a brief history of impactful sci-fi publications, like The Foundation Trilogy, by Isaac Asimov and Starship Troopers, by Robert A. Heinlein.[64] Alternate perspectives validate sci-fi as part of the fuzzy images of the future.[63] However, the challenge is the lack of consistent futures research based literature frameworks.[64] Ian Miles reviews The New Encyclopedia of Science Fiction, identifying ways Science Fiction and Futures Studies cross-fertilize, as well as the ways in which they differ distinctly. Science Fiction cannot be simply considered fictionalized Futures Studies. It may have aims other than prediction, and be no more concerned with shaping the future than any other genre of literature. [65] It is not to be understood as an explicit pillar of futures studies, due to its inconsistency of integrated futures research. Additionally, Dennis Livingston, a literature and Futures journal critic says, The depiction of truly alternative societies has not been one of science fictions strong points, especially preferred, normative envisages.[66]

Read this article:
Futures studies - Wikipedia

Posted in Futurism | Comments Off on Futures studies – Wikipedia