Jack London 1: The Call of the WildThe Wolf in Dogs Clothing [1]Jack London, The Call of the Wild, original edition of 1903
Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheeps clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves, warns Jesus (Matthew 7:15). According to Jesus, wolf is a metaphor for false prophet. According to American novelist Jack London, wolf is a metaphor for the fallen human race. In one of the most widely read novels of all time, The Call of the Wild, along with sequels White Fang and The Sea Wolf, London undresses the wolf hiding in human clothing.
Just a quick reminder of the plot. Buck, a pet dog from Santa Clara Valley in California, was dognapped and taken to Alaska to pull sleds. In the Klondike, away from civilization, Buck began to revert to an earlier stage of evolution. The dominant primordial beast was strong in Buck, writes London. After a fight with another dog, Spitz, Buck emerges triumphant over Spitz just as the wolf becomes triumphant over the dog. Buck stood and looked on, the successful champion, the dominant primordial beast who had made his kill and found it good (London, Call of the Wild).
What is true for the wolf within Buck is as true for the wolf within the human. The dog slaver gained dominance over Buck by hitting him with a club.
After a particularly fierce blow he [Buck] crawled to his feet, too dazed to rush. He staggered limply about, the blood flowing from nose and mouth and ears, his beautiful coat sprayed and flecked with bloody slaver. The man advanced and deliberately dealt him a frightful blow on the nose. All the pain he had endured was as nothing compared with the exquisite agony of this (London, Call of the Wild).
What Jack London himself witnessed in the Klondike that became background for his wolf books was human nature in the raw. When gold prospectors from California and the rest of the world converged on Alaska in the 1890s, they left their modern humanity behind. The civil became uncivil. The humane became inhuman. Law and order were discarded and replaced by the Law of Club and Fang. The primordial wolf, once suppressed, emerged again in both dog and human with ferocity and bloodshed. At any moment, London implied, what we know as orderly civilization could suddenly revert to an earlier stage of evolution where nature is blood red in tooth and claw (Tennyson, In Memoriam).
Might there be a dovetail between Jack Londons evolutionary anthropology and the public theologians understanding of original sin? Was the masterful teller of dog stories actually a literary philosopher exploring human nature? Was London even conscious that he was synthesizing science with religion?
Here are our existential questions: are we Homo sapiens more civilized than a wolf pack? If not, can we hope for redemption descending from heaven in the form a UFO coming to Earth to advance our civilization beyond the wolf stage of evolution? Will extraterrestrial aliens provide the grace we need to transcend our inherited wolf traits?
What!? UFOs!? How do these things fit together?
In this Patheos Public Theology series analyzing a portion of the corpus of prodigious California novelist and short story author, Jack London, we will apply the analytic tools developed in the field of Theology and Literature. Specifically, we will follow the path blazed by one of my favorite University of Chicago professors, Nathan A. Scott (1925-2006).
We have only one topical question: will we Homo sapiens evolve into civilized creatures that outgrow our wolflike tendencies toward violence? We will ask this one question multiple times as we review Jack Londons different writings. Heres whats coming.
Jack London 1: The Call of the Wild
Jack London 2: White Fang
Jack London 3: The Sea Wolf
Jack London 4: Lone Wolf Ethics
Jack London 5: Wolf Pack Ethics
Jack London 6: Wolf & Lamb Ethics
Jack London 7: The Red One
Oh, yes, multiple movies have been made ofThe Call of the Wildover the decades. Most recently in 2020 (Hulu online), The Call of the Wildfilm starred Harrison Ford. Ford played a man named John Thornton, not Buck. In the 1935 film, it was Clark Gable (full movie online). And, in the 1997 version, it was Rutger Hauer as John Thornton and Richard Dreyfuss as narrator. You can watch a 2009 childrens variant with Christopher Lloyd here.
The field of Theology and Literature has fallen on rough times. More frequently today, universities offer courses on Theology and Film.
I was privileged to study under Nathan A. Scott at the University of Chicago. Dr. Scott was a pioneer in the field of Theology and Literature (Scott 1994). He borrowed from Paul Tillich the notion that religion is the depth of culture and culture the form of religion, a notion amplified by Reinhold Niebuhr and Langdon Gilkey (Tillich 1951-1963, 3: 158). Scott applied this notionthe depth of cultureeffectively to his literary criticism. Not only did this provide a new set of insights regarding literature, it also enriched theology.
Christian theology, as a result of its dialogue with great literature of the modern period, will find itself more richly repaid (in terms of deepened awareness of both of itself and of the age) than any other similar transaction it may undertake.(Scott 1994) [2]
What I so appreciated as a student was the way Scott could make transparent the religious depth hidden beneath secular surfaces. Scott asked Tillichs question: what is ultimate? Scott did not ask any questions about science. But I certainly do.
May we expand Theology & Literature into Theology, Science & Literature? A Scott student now a professor at Baylor University, Ralph C. Wood, gives us permission. Both scientific and religious knowledge flourish when they engage present concerns by way of antecedent experience, and thus as they formulate judgments and principles via constant modification and enlargement. (Wood 2012, 31). London the fictional author provides the low hanging fruit of antecedent experience which the public theologian will find easy picking.
As you will soon see, I plan to ask questions about science. When we turn to Americas most widely read author of the first quarter of the twentieth century, Jack London, Charles Darwins theory of evolution explodes like fire works on the 4th of July. Without attending to the science, the reader could not grasp Londons anthropology. It is in the evolutionary anthropology where we find religious depth.
In 1915, the father of depth psychology, Sigmund Freud drew a conclusion Jack London had arrived at two decades earlier. The primitive, savage and evil impulses of mankind have not vanished in any individual, but are simply waiting for the opportunity to show themselves again.
Now to our topical question: does a ravenous wolf lurk within each of us? Only some of us? Must we remain ever alert to the danger that our repressed evolutionary past will surge forth in viciousness, chaos, destruction? Is our civilized order threatened at every moment with dissolving into a cauldron of primeval violence?
Jack London thought so while in Alaska during the Klondike God Rush, 1896-1899. Today, we ask with London: do both dogs and humans bear the genes of a common ancestor, the wolf? If so, must our future be determined by our evolutionary past?
There is more. Much more. The prescient Jack London a century ago asked a very contemporary question: did interstellar travelers intervene in Earths evolution in order to accelerate human development? Are we Homo sapiens a hybrid progeny of terrestrial apes and extraterrestrial geneticists? If so, why does the ravaging world still growl within the terrestrial soul?
Or, to put it another way, should we spend more time in front of our TVs watching Ancient Aliens?
On the one hand, according to London, todays Homo sapiens could without notice suddenly revert to our ravenous wolf past. On the other hand, according to London, Jesus points us to an egalitarian, humane, and socialist future. London had considered writing a short story about Jesus. Then, he thought better of it and abandoned the idea(Williams, Author Under Sail: The Imagination of Jack London 1902-1907. 2021, 37).
Lets say this again. On the one hand, Charles Darwins law of natural selection or Herbert Spencers survival of the fittest incarcerates Homo sapiens in a primeval past from which we can never on our own escape.
On the other hand, the science of Marxist socialismwhich enamored London the labor organizerpromises human transformation. It promises temporal transcendence. It promises an egalitarian, prosperous, and humane future. Redemption will come through revolution.
London was an supporter of the Bolshevik momentum leading to the revolution of 1917 in Russia. He endorsed Marxist socialism. The Call of the Wildbecame required reading for school children for many years in both the Soviet Union and Maoist China. Jack Londons name is engraved on a wall in the Kremlin. Just how, we ask, can we reconcile Londons atavism via evolution with his anticipation of a post-revolutionary utopia?
So, which is it? Are we imprisoned in our past or liberated for our future? That is the human struggle that points us to religious depth. At least as deep as London can dig.
Here, in this small bite, is the fare garnished and served up in thirty-nine books and countless short stories by Californias notorious author, Jack London (1876-1916). Just a little more than a century ago, this adventurer and novelist literally penned three fictional accounts of what I dub, The Wolves of Jack London.[3] The troika includes The Call of the Wild (1903), White Fang (1904), and The Sea-Wolf (1906). Whether in dogs or in their human masters, the convulsive combination of love for life and vicious cruelty surges up from the primordial Wild still lurking within us.
For London there are connections among evolutionary theory, criminality, and primitivism, observes Jay Williams. The impulse to commit crime is something that comes out of the mysterious unknown, or the unconscious(Williams, Author Under Sail: The Imagination of Jack London 1902-1907. 2021, 270). Theologians will think about original sin or even inherited sin here. Theologians will also think about the relationship between natural evil and moral evil.[4] But this is not Londons vocabulary.
Reversion is perennially a threat. At any moment we humans or our dogs may revert to an atavistic heritage that has been apparently lost for a hundred generations. Primeval ferocity is ever ready to pounce. In the 1901 short story, A Relic of the Pliocene, a prehistoric mammoth appears and engages a Klondike hunter in a life-and-death struggle. At any moment, the dead past can live again. Still we ask: can we look forward to a future where that threat will be no more?
White Fang would comprehend a most striking line that appears in David Brooks new book, The Second Mountain. Speaking of her daughter, a young mother says to Brooks, I found I loved her more than evolution required(Brooks 2019, 42). Can the love we share as civilized beings rocket us up and off from our evolutionary launch pad? Or, is the gravity of our ancestral instinct for survival so strong that well inevitably crash back to earth strewn with tooth gnawed bones?
Nature is blood red in tooth and claw, averred Alfred Lord Tennyson in the dinosaur canto of his In Memoriam in the middle of the nineteenth century. According to Michael Lundblad, the law of the jungle later in the nineteenth and early in the twentieth century meant the behavior of wild animals can be equated with natural human instincts not only for competition and reproduction but also for violence and exploitation(Lundblad 2013, 1). Is todays civilization condemned to remain in the past, governed solely by natural selection or the survival-of-the-fittest?
To repeat the theme: the dog becomes a wolf in The Call of the Wild. Buck, a dog from San Francisco goes to Alaska during the gold rush of the 1890s. Instincts hitherto repressed by domestication rush into Bucks consciousness, instincts borne through millions of evolutionary years. He must master or be mastered; while to show mercy was a weakness. Mercy did not exist in the primordial life. It was misunderstood for fear, and such misunderstandings made for death. Kill or be killed, eat or be eaten, was the law; and this mandate, down out of the depths of Time, he obeyed. Like Platos Meno, Buck the dog was learning what he already knew from a previous incarnation as a wolf.
After his reversion to the wolf, Buck was chasing a rabbit.
All that stirring of old instincts, which at stated periods drives men out from the sounding cities to forest and plain to kill things by chemically propelled leaden pellets, the blood lust, the joy to killall this was Bucks, only it was infinitely more intimate. He was ranging at the head of the pack, running the wild thing down, the living meat, to kill with his own teeth and wash his muzzle to the eyes in warm blood. (London, The Call of the Wild 1903)
Note that it is not only Buck the dog who washes his muzzle in warm blood. So does the human race.[5]
Philosophically, Jack London was a naturalist. Any naturalistic perspective in our post-Darwinian era must recognize that nature is blood red in tooth and claw, that survival-of-the-fittest determines the winners in the struggle for existence, that killer animals are our ancestors, and that their propensity for violence lives on in Homo sapiens.
Can we ground our ethics in nature understood this way? If nature alone is to provide a foundation for human ethical deliberation, must we construct our ethical superstructure on this evolutionary inheritance? The result would be wolf ethics. In short, a Darwinian naturalist would have no inclination to be nice. How might a public theologian assess this?
Whats next in our Patheos Public Theology series on Jack London? White Fang.Whereas Buck inThe Call of the Wildis a dog who goes to Alaska and becomes a wolf, White Fang is a wolf in Alaska who moves to California and becomes a dog. Look for the next post in this Patheos series on the wolves of Jack London.
Ted Peters is a Lutheran pastor and emeritus seminary professor, teaching theology and ethics. He specializes in the creative mutual interaction between science and theology. He co-edits the journal, Theology and Science. His one volume systematic theology is now in its 3rd edition, GodThe Worlds Future (Fortress 2015). His book, God in Cosmic History, traces the rise of the Axial religions 2500 years ago. He has undertaken a thorough examination of the sin-and-grace dialectic in two works, Sin: Radical Evil in Soul and Society (Eerdmans 1994) and Sin Boldly! (Fortress 2015). Watch for his forthcoming, The Voice of Christian Public Theology (ATF 2022). See his website: TedsTimelyTake.com and Patheos column on Public Theology, https://www.patheos.com/blogs/publictheology/.Ted Peters fictional series of espionage thrillers features Leona Foxx, a hybrid woman who is both a spy and a parish pastor.
I. Incontestably, animals and humans inhabit the same world, the same objective world even if they do not have the same experience of the objectivity of the object 2. Incontestably, animals and humans do not inhabit the same world, for the human world will never be purely and simply identical to the world of animals 3. In spite of this identity and this difference, neither animals of different species, nor humans of different cultures, nor any animal or human individual inhabit the same world as another the difference between one world and another will remain always unbridgeable, because the community of the world is always constructed, simulated by a set of stabilizing apparatuses nowhere and never given in nature. (Derrida, 2009, 8-9)
When applying Derridas view of worldview, Hannah Strmmen tries to reestablish human-animal continuity minus human sovereignty over the animals.
If part of animal studies is attempting to think the animal outside a logic of human sovereignty, and to attempt to rethink humananimal relationships outside, or other to, such a discourse of power, then a different kind of discourse is needed that can do precisely that (Strmmen, 2017, 408).
The power that humans exert over their dogs and other animals in Jack Londons stories stresses both human cruelty and human kindness. Both exemplify sovereignty. Yet, both are intended to convey the wolflike traits still operative at the human level.
Basket, Sam. 1996. Sea Change in The Sea Wolf. In Rereading Jack London, by eds Leonard Cassato and Jeanne Campbell Reesman, 92-109. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Berkove, Lawrence. 2004. Jack London and Evolution: From Spencer to Huxley. American Literary Realism 36:3 243-255.
Berkove, Lawrence. 1996. The Myth of Hope in Jack Londons The Red One. In Rereading Jack London, by eds Leonard Cassuto and Jeanne Campbell Reesman, 204-216. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Brandt, Kenneth. 2018. Jack London: An Adventurous Mind. In Jack London, by Kenneth K. Brandt. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press (Northcote).
Brooks, David. 2019. The Second Mountain. New York: Random House.
Derrida, Jacques. 2009. The Beast and the Sovereign. Vol. I, trans. Geoffrey Bennington. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.
Deudney, Daniel. 2020. Dark Skies: Space Expansionism, Planetary Geopolitics, and the Ends of Humanity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, James. 1978. A New Reading of The Sea Wolf. In Jack London: Essays in Criticism, by ed Ray Wilson Ownbey, 92-99. Santa Barbara CA: Peregrine Smith.
Faulstick, Dustin. 2015. The Preacher Thought as I Think. Studies in American Naturalism 10:1 1-21.
Kean, Sam. 5/6/2011. Red in Tooth and Claw Among the Literati. Science 332 654-656.
Labor, Earle. 1996. Afterword. In Rereading Jack London, by eds Leonard Cassuto and Jeanne Campbell Reesman, 217-223. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Leder, Steve. 2019. The Beasts Within Us. Time Special Edition on The Science of Good and Evil 84-87.
London, Jack. 1903. The Call of the Wild.
. 1916. The Red One.
. 1906. The Sea Wolf.
. 1904. White Fang.
Lundblad, Michael. 2013. The Birth of a Jungle: Animality in Progressive Era US Literature and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moritz, Joshua. 2008. Evolutionary Evil and Dawkins Black Box. In The Evolution of Evil, by Martinez J Hewlett, Ted Peters, and Robert John Russell, eds Gaymon Bennett, 143-188. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Niebuhr, Reinhold. 1941. The Nature and Destiny of Man, 2 Volumes. New York: Scribners.
Oliveri, Vinnie. 2001. Sex, Gender, and Death in The Sea Wolf. Pacific Coast Philology 38 99-115.
Reesman, Jeanne Campbell. 2012. The American Novel: Realism and Naturalism. In A Companion to the American Novel, by ed Alfred Bendixen, 42-59. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Scott, Nathan. 1994. A Ramble on a Road Taken. Christianity and Literature 43 (2): 205-212.
Sinding, Mikkel-Holger S., et.al. 2020. Arctic-adapted dogs emerged at the Pleistocene-Holocene transition. Science 368:6498 1495-1499.
Stasz, Clarice. 1996. Social Darwinism, Gender, and Humor in Adventure. In Rereading Jack London, by eds Leonard Cassuto and Jeanne Campbell Reesman, 130-140. Stanford CA: Standord University Press.
Strmmen, Hannah. 2017. Literature and Theology 31:4: 405-419.
Tillich, Paul. 1951-1963. Systematic Theology. 1st. 3 Volumes: Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wilkinson, David. 2013. Science, Religion, and the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williams, Jay. 2014. Author Under Sail: The Imagination of Jack London 1893-1902. Lincoln NB: University of Nebraska Press.
. 2021. Author Under Sail: The Imagination of Jack London 1902-1907. Lincoln NB: University of Nebraska Press.
Wood, Ralph. 2010. Flannery OConner, Benedict XVI, and the Divine Eros. Christianity and Literature 60:1 35-64.
Wood, Ralph. 2012. The Lady in the Torn Hair Who Looks on Gladiators in Grapple: G.K. Chestertons Marian Poems. Christianity & Literature 62:1 29-55.
Read more here:
Jack London 1: The Call of the Wild - Patheos
Recommendation and review posted by G. Smith
