Category Archives: Anatomy

Greys Anatomy fans were shocked when April Kepner (Sarah Drew) ran off into the sunset with Matthew Taylor (Justin Bruening). For years, viewers watched Aprils rollercoaster romance with Jackson Avery (Jesse Williams), only to end up with the man she left at the altar. But will April and Matthew ever return to Greys Anatomy? Heres what Drew and Bruening have said about reprising their roles on the Shondaland medical drama.

RELATED: Greys Anatomy: This Is How April Should Have Been Written Off the Show

April and Matthew met in Greys Anatomy Season 9. The trauma surgeon and paramedic seemed to hit it off right away, particularly because of their shared faith. But fans also knew the long history between Jackson and April.

Eventually, April and Matthew decided to get married, despite her lingering feelings for her best friend. Then at April and Matthews wedding ceremony, Jackson got up and confessed his love. So Jackson and April ran off together, leaving Matthew behind.

By Greys Anatomy Season 14, April and Jackson broke up. The trauma surgeon then reconnected with Matthew, who lost his wife and had a daughter of his own. Their reunion was uncomfortable at first. But as time went on, the couple got back together.

Later, at Jo Wilson (Camilla Luddington) and Alex Karevs (Justin Chambers) wedding which didnt actually happen due to a series of unfortunate events Matthew proposed to April. And when Alex and Jos officiant arrived at the scene, April and Matthew decided to tie the knot right away. Then the couple presumably received their happily ever after away from Grey Sloan Memorial.

RELATED: Greys Anatomy: What Happened to Jacksons Daughter?

In May 2020, Bruening made a splash on Netflixs latest drama, Sweet Magnolias. Then when speaking with TV Insider about his new show, Bruening opened up about his role as Matthew on Greys Anatomy. The actor revealed he auditioned 20 times for the ABC medical drama before landing Matthew. Bruening then answered whether or not he would ever return to Greys Anatomy in the future.

My character isnt dead, he said. Even on soaps, unless your head is separated from your body, theres a way to find your way back. They didnt kill me.

Bruening continued, Trust me, I asked. I die in the next episode, right? They finally said, Why do you think were going to kill you? I said, You kill everybody! Fortunately, they did not kill me and I got to play on that show for a long time. It was one of the most fun roles of my career.

Bruening also hinted Matthew is still around somewhere. So who knows what could happen in the future. Im still a working paramedic, he said.

RELATED: Greys Anatomy: Are Jesse Williams and Sarah Drew Friends in Real Life?

Following her grand exit on Greys Anatomy, Drew has shared her thoughts on Aprils return. And for the most part, it seemed the actor was willing to keep the door open. But she also acknowledged she needed to say goodbye to the character at the time.

Ill never say never because they are my family, Drew told Entertainment Tonight in 2018. I still love everyone over there. I love that community and I still have such an incredible space in my heart for everyone over there.

She continued, But I really do feel like, because of how it went down, I really had to part ways with April, I just had to. There was no way for me to live in a space of possibility of her returning and also be healthy in my letting go of all of it. So I really have said goodbye to her.

A year later, the Greys Anatomy fandom wondered whether April would come back after showrunner Krista Vernoff hinted the show wanted to highlight the return of a former cast member in season 16. As we know now, this was never realized. However, when Drew was asked about returning, the actor confirmed she was open to the idea.

I will never close the door on my family at Greys, so it just depends, Drew told Entertainment Tonight in 2019. Its a hard question to answer because it is not an opportunity that has presented itself.

Whether or not April and Matthew ever return to Greys Anatomy, at least the actors behind the characters are open to coming back. But for now, well just have to add the reunion to our ever-growing wish list.

RELATED: Greys Anatomy: Krista Vernoff Reveals Why Alex Karev Didnt Die in Season 16

Here is the original post:
'Grey's Anatomy': Will April and Matthew Ever Return? The Door Is Still Open - Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Kenneth Research recently added a new market research report on Global Human Anatomical Models Market which discusses the scope of the market during the next few years. The report consists of the market size, market value, the annual growth rate, Y-o-Y growth (%) for the forecast period, i.e., 2020-2026. A complete and thorough overview of the market is provided in the report which discusses the various aspects of the market such as the geographical presence, key players, market segmentation, growth drivers, and challenges prevalent in the market in depth.

The Final Report will cover the impact analysis of COVID-19 on this industry (Global and Regional Market).

Request for a Sample Copy (including TOC, Tables, and Figures) of Research Report:https://www.kennethresearch.com/sample-request-10082861

The global Human Anatomical Models Market has grown significantly over the past few years and is anticipated to expand at a rapid pace till 2026. This market study provides an in-depth assessment on market size and year on year growth of global Human Anatomical Models Market in terms of revenue, various levels of in-depth market segmentation, market dynamics which comprises of the demand side, supply-side and economy side drivers, market restraints, challenges and opportunities and trends which are prevailing in this market and impacting the growth of the market. Worldwide Human Anatomical Models Market highlights its existing absolute $ opportunity. Further, this market is likely to achieve considerable absolute $ opportunity by the year 2026 as compared to the value achieved in the year 2018.

The global Human Anatomical Models Market study comprises of risk analysis which covers market demand risk and market supply risk impacting the growth of this market. Further, the report covers a section on correlation and regression analysis in which the relationship between independent and dependent variables have been analyzed to have better clarity and understanding of the market. The global Human Anatomical Models Market includes a chapter on macro-economic indicators impacting the growth of this market.

Further, a separate section in the report highlights the geography scenario in this market which includes North America (further bifurcated into U.S. and Canada).

Based on the geographical analysis, the report covers the market scenario for the following regions around the world:

A series of illustrations such as graphs, tables, and charts are provided in the report to make the report easy to comprehend for the business clients.

The Final Report will cover the impact analysis of COVID-19 on this industry (Global and Regional Market).

Request for a Sample Copy (including TOC, Tables, and Figures) of Research Report:https://www.kennethresearch.com/sample-request-10082861

Scope for the Customization:

We are open for the customization of this report for our client.

Table of Content:

Key Answers Captured in Report?

The Final Report will cover the impact analysis of COVID-19 on this industry (Global and Regional Market).

Request for Complete Report:https://www.kennethresearch.com/sample-request-10082861

About Kenneth Research:

Kenneth Research provides market research reports to different individuals, industries, associations, and organizations with the aim of helping them to take prominent decisions. Our research library comprises more than 10,000 research reports provided by more than 15 market research publishers across different industries. Our collection of market research solutions covers both the macro level as well as micro-level categories with relevant and suitable market research titles. As a global market research reselling firm, Kenneth Research provides significant analysis of various markets with pure business intelligence and consulting services on different industries across the globe. In addition to that, our internal research team always keeps a track of the international and domestic market for any economic changes impacting the products demand, growth, and opportunities for new and existing players.

New Research Reports Available @Kenneth Research:

Recruitment Process Outsourcing (RPO) MarketReal-time Polymerase Chain Reaction MarketReal Estate Software MarketRadio Frequency Identification MarketPure Play Software Testing Services MarketPublic Sector Outsourcing Market

Read more:
Human Anatomical Models Market Analysis With Influence of COVID-19 Pandemic on Demand, Top Key Players, Trends, Future Growth, Revenue Forecast to...

Katherine Heigl's meteoric rise in Hollywood started with her breakout role in Grey's Anatomy.

Heigl, now 41 years old, played medical intern Dr. Isobel Stevenson in the medical drama for six seasons. Her acting in the series cemented her place amongst Hollywood's A-listers and transformed her into a bankable movie star.

In 2007, Heigl was at the top of her game. She was the first Grey's Anatomy actor to win an Emmy for their performance on the program. Heigl had also received two Golden Globe nominations for Best Supporting Actress in 2007 and 2008.

However, her descent was equally as swift, and suddenly the beloved actress had a lot of explaining to do.

In 2008, Katherine Heigl was expecting another Emmy nomination for Grey's Anatomy. However, she pulled out of the race saying she didn't deserve a nomination because the writing for her character wasn't good enough in Season 4.

"I did not feel that I was given the material this season to warrant an Emmy nomination and in an effort to maintain the integrity of the academy organisation, I withdrew my name from contention," she said in an official statement. "In addition, I did not want to potentially take away an opportunity from an actress who was given such materials."

In 2012, veteran showrunner Shonda Rhimes addressed Heigl's choice to pull herself from contention in an interview with Oprah Winfrey.

"On some level it stung and on some level I was not surprised," Rhimes told Winfrey of Heigl's 2008 statement. "When people show you who they are, believe them. I carry that [mantra] with me a lot. It has served me well."

Heigl's Emmy incident may have just blown over. But it coincided with her making some controversial comments about her role in Judd Apatow's critically acclaimed comedy Knocked Up.

In a 2008 cover story for Vanity Fair, Heigl told Leslie Bennett that she had some personal problems with the film.

"It was a little sexist," she said. "It paints the women as shrews, as humourless and uptight, and it paints the men as lovable, goofy, fun-loving guys. It exaggerated the characters, and I had a hard time with it, on some days. I'm playing such a bitch; why is she being such a killjoy? Why is this how you're portraying women? Ninety-eight per cent of the time it was an amazing experience, but it was hard for me to love the movie."

In 2016, Heigl seemed to backpedal on her remarks about the film and considered issuing an apology to Apatow.

"I liked the movie a lot. I just didn't like me," Heigl said during an interview on The Howard Stern Show in April, 2016. On her character, Heigl said, "She was kind of like, she was so judgemental and kind of uptight and controlling and all these things and I really went with it while we were doing it, and a lot of it, Judd allows everyone to be very free and improvise and whatever, and afterwards, I was like, 'Why is that where I went with this? What an arsehole she is!'"

"I've thought about writing a note," she said. "I feel embarrassed. I don't want to feel insincere on any level."

She also recalled how she'd issued an apology to Rhimes after her Emmys statement that caused an uproar at the time.

"I went in because I was really embarrassed. So I went in to [see] Shonda and said, 'I'm so sorry. That wasn't cool. I should not have said that.' And I shouldn't have said anything publicly," Heigl added. "But at the time, I didn't think anybody would notice... I just quietly didn't submit and then it became a story, and I felt I was obligated to make my statement, and [I should have just said], 'Shut up, Katie.'"

Despite her reputation taking a hit, Heigl landed three leading film roles: 27 Dresses (2008), The Ugly Truth (2009), and Life As We Know It (2010).

However, the job offers soon began to slow down. She was cast for a small role in New Year's Eve (2011) which was a flop at the box office.

Heigl then signed on for the lead role in One for the Money (2012), which bombed and only grossed US$36 million. The same year, she expressed interest in returning to the show that catapulted her to fame: Grey's Anatomy.

"I really, really, really want to see where [Izzie] is," she told E! Online during promotion for One for the Money. "I just want to know what happened to her and where she went and what she's doing now. My idea is that she actually, like, figures it out, and finds some success and does really well in a different hospital. She was always floundering, you know, and so she was always one step behind the eight ball and I want to see that girl take some power back."

But show-creator Rhimes didn't seem tempted by Heigl's renewed interest in the show.

"I think it was really nice to hear her appreciating the show. At the same time we are on a track we have planning," Rhimes told TV Guide in 2012. "The idea of changing that track is not something we are interested in right now."

By 2014, there was no denying that industry had turned its back on Heigl. "This thing that was my best friend for a long time suddenly turned on me," Heigl told Marie Claire in 2014.

"And I didn't expect it. I was taken by surprise and angry at it for betraying me.

Last year, Heigl's career seemed to take a turn for the better when she was cast in the legal drama Suits.

When Meghan Markle left the show to marry Prince Harry, Heigl stepped in as a new character to replace the Duchess of Sussex. It was the TV comeback that Heigl's remaining fans had hoped for.

"Joining Suits was the perfect organic way to not only collaborate with an E.P. I admire deeply, but to also become part of a show and cast that I am an immense fan of," Heigl told The Hollywood Reporter. "I have watched Suits from the very beginning and feel incredibly lucky to be the newest member of the Pearson Specter Litt family."

Heigl is in the middle of post-production for a Netflix series called Firefly Lane, which is based on the novel by Kristin Hannah. She's also in post-production for a film called Fear of Rain and just finished filming a pilot for a TV series called Our House.

Heigl is reportedly worth US$30 million (approx. $45.4 million), according to celebritynetworth.com.

Heigl and her husband Josh Kelley share three children: Nancy Leigh Mi-Eun Kelley, Adalaide Marie Hope Kelley, Joshua Bishop Kelley, Jr. They have been married since 2007, and are still going strong.

There's no doubt that the actress has had a tumultuous career but it appears that Heigl is finally back on track.

Celebrity feuds: The co-stars who didn't get along

Read the original post:
What happened to Katherine Heigl? - 9TheFIX

TERRE HAUTE, Ind. (WTHI) -The warm months across the Midwest bring a common sightthunderstorms.

Since we all like to get outside when the temperature gets warmer, we need to know how to spot a thunderstorm.

These are usually formed with big clouds.

At the front of the storm, on the bottom, you may see what we call a shelf cloud.

It sticks out from the bottom of the storm, as one long cloud.

On the front part of the storm at the top is what we call the mammatus.

This looks like a much bigger shelf angling out ahead of the top of the storm.

After a storm passes through, the back side has some specific characteristics as well.

On the bottom is what looks like the shelf cloud, except it is more compact.

This is what we call the wall cloud.

The wall cloud can also be the start of a tornado developing.

On the back side of the storm is called the flanking line.

This is what we see as the storm goes away, and these clouds look more scattered out, and not as full.

Finally the last two parts may be the most important.

This first line is called a spiraling updraft.

This is the warm air that fuels the storm.

Once it makes it to the top of the storm, we get a downdraft.

This is where wind, hail, and rain are formed as they make their way to the ground.

Now something else we usually associate with a thunderstorm is lightning.

So next time Ill be talking about heat lightning, and whether or not its actually real.

Read more:
The Anatomy Of A Thunderstorm - WTHITV.com

In D. W. Youngs lighthearted, lexical short film A Body of Language, a bookdealer shows off one of the antiquarian book worlds favorite prints: a caricature of a bedraggled, elderly bibliophile standing in a muddle of books, as if he has risen from them. His hair is slightly mussed, eyes obscured behind spectacles, and he wears a suit with a pocket square. Titled Anatomy of an Antiquarian Bookseller, the posters provenance makes it something that dealers of rare tomes especially appreciate: only fifty lithographs of the design, by the artist Ronald Searle, were produced, as a commission for the centenary of a Scottish book-trading firm. Searle labelled the portrait with terms drawn from the vernacular of book-dealing that apply equally to the settling and slumping of a body, which, once in fine condition, is now merely fair: dog-eared; mottled calf; joints badly worn; spine cracked.

The obscure and fanciful language of the book worldparticularly the bodily lingois the focus of the above film, and the two dozen or so booksellers interviewed on camera describe with relish their favorite terms. I love the words, one dealer says. The way that they resonate within a kind of closed system is so beautiful, and the way that they relate to humansthe head of the spine, the foot of the spine, the spine. Dentelles, another tells us, as he ever so gently traces a finger down a frilly gilt border, is the name for the golden edging on the inside of a cover; the word is drawn from the French dentelle, which means lace, and which itself comes from the Middle French for little tooth.

It is often fascinating to hear experts discuss their craft, because the demonstration of extreme competence and precision is powerfully appealing: there is a name for every part and every production method, and particularly for every malady. The specialized language is all in the service of diagnosis and correction. When a book has been read too much or loved too roughly, its thumb-soiled (deliciously icky-sounding). If the spine tilts just a bit to the side, its slightly cocked. (A little juvenile, dont you think? one book dealer exclaims.) When paper is browning from age or moisture, its foxed. Some things sound bad but are not so: stab holes might show that a book has been bound from side-stitched installments that were published separately. And that mottled calf from the poster isnt a sign of decayits only the name for a method of using dribbles of acid to make young leather look more interesting. Accordingly, and comfortingly, the language of cures for booky ills is also expansive. The film tells us about wormholes in the binding, showing spines chawed to dust by pests, but it also reassures us about the existence of rembotage: the procedure for swapping covers if you have one volume with marvellous innards but a ragged cover, and another that is gorgeously packaged but drab inside. And a look through the ABC for Book Collectorsthe antiquarians bible, compiled by John Carter and Nicolas Barkerreveals that, while books can be chipped, creased, tired, and disbound, they can also be re-cased, pressed, re-hinged, and guarded. (If only healing the cockled or faded body were so easy.)

If all professions are conspiracies against the laityas one bookseller jokes, quoting George Bernard Shawthen sometimes the rest of us want to be in the congregation, guided by someone who can offer us the language to describe our parts. The professionals, positively glowing with their expertise, reassure us that someone has already seen and recognized the details, and has a word for the state of things and how they are likely to change over time. Whats more, someone has already devised a fix for our troubles. Searles scribbly and just a bit soiled librarian does not need to be a rare survivalan astonishingly well-preserved and scarce piece. His appeal comes from his dictionary of imperfections, and because the cataloguing of exacting terms is its own kind of delight.

Originally posted here:
Anatomy of a Book - The New Yorker

Studio E has been wound up owing 144,014 to its remaining four staff and other creditors. Documents filed with Companies House show it has just15,688 to its name.

Yet just 12 years ago it employed 45 staff and had assets of 168,048.

Here we chart the history of a once-celebrated practice which won a Queens Award for Enterprise exactly 10 years ago. It had been under enormous pressure in recent years, even before its staff were called to give evidence to the Grenfell Tower Inquiry about its part in the tragedy that claimed 72 lives. One staffer has yet to complete his testimony after being taken unwell twice during Marchs sessions.

In January it emerged that the practice could not afford legal representation at the inquiry.

And its Companies House history shows it has moved offices four times since 2014 and twice this year. Its creditors include its landlord to whom it owes 10,000 in rent.

The award-winning practice has been through a number of guises since it was founded as Studio E Architects Ltd in 1994 by former RMJM staffer and impresario David Lloyd Jones with Cezary Bednarski and Andrzej Kuszell.

A parallel company, Studio E LLP, was set up in 2007 but only started trading in 2011. It was part of an on-off plan to give more control to the younger directors, according to evidence given by Kuszell to the Grenfell Inquiry in March.

The LLP gradually took over all the original firms work. At its peak in June 2008 it employed 45 staff and its net assets were 168,048.

But after running into financial difficulties the LLP went into voluntary creditors liquidation in July 2014, two years after it had been appointed in controversial circumstances to carry out the 9.4m Grenfell Tower refurbishment.

The original firm, Studio E Architects Ltd (SEAL), which had never been closed, took over again. But the practice shrank significantly and by March 31, 2017 it employed 12 staff and had net assets of 48,803.

Current and past members of staff spent two weeks in March giving evidence to the Grenfell Inquiry about the refurbishment and cladding of the tower which contributed to the deadly spread of fire in June 2017, resulting in 72 deaths.

When the inquiry opened in January its barrister Prashant Popat said Studio E could not afford full legal representation and that his 30-minute opening remarks would the only time the firm had legal representation at the hearings.

He said the architect had had to make difficult decisions about how to engage with the process because it did not have the resources to hire a full team of lawyers or even study all of the inquiry documents. That was also the reason it did not appear at the phase one hearings.

It is just a necessary consequence of the financial limitations placed upon the company, Popat said at Januarys session. The truth is that due to the funding restrictions, Studio E has not been able to consider with its advisors all evidence disclosed by the inquiry, or by the other participants.

In its heyday Studio E designed Grange Park Opera House in Sussex and a number of celebrated schools including City of London Academy in Southwark which won a Prime Ministers Better Public Building Award in 2006. In 2008 it was named best school architect in the British Council for School Environments awards.

In 2010 it became only the fourth architecture practice to receive a Queens Award for Enterprise, awarded for its continuous achievement in sustainable development.

See the original post:
Studio E: Anatomy of the death of a practice - Building Design