Search Immortality Topics:

Page 427«..1020..426427428429..440450..»


Category Archives: Stem Cell Therapy

CSCR Reading List: A Look at the Grant Appeal Process at the California Stem Cell Agency


Here is a list of articles from the California Stem Cell Report as well as CIRM documents dealing with the grant appeal process at the California stem cell agency. The list was prepared on Aug. 16, 2012. To read the entire articles, click on the links.

Articles from the California Stem Cell Report

Aug. 7, 2012
A tiny opening exists for scientists
who failed to win approval last month of their bids for $20 million
research awards from the California stem cell agency.
July 26, 2012
Directors of the California stem cell
agency today approved $151 million in research awards aimed at
commercializing stem cell research and pushing therapies into
clinical treatment....Five of the applications involving appeals were
sent back by the board for more review. (See herehere and here.)
They will be considered again in early September or October.
July 24, 2012
The California stem cell agency's
latest grant round – which is budgeted for $243 million – has
drawn an extraordinary and record outpouring of appeals from more
than half of the scientists rejected by the grant reviewers. Nine of
the 15 applicants who were turned down have filed appeals to the
governing board for its meeting
Thursday
 in Burlingame. No other CIRM grant round
has drawn as high a percentage of appeals, formally known as
extraordinary petitions. (See here
for a story on the previous record 
for percentage of
appeals.)
Aug. 10, 2010

Emotionalism and Potential Favoritism Cited as Need for Changes in CIRM Grant Appeals
Passion and favoritism, democracy and gamesmanship – all are part of the ongoing discussion among directors of the $3 billion California stem cell agency as they try to fix what some of them call a “broken” grant appeal process.

July 19, 2010
UC Davis Scientist Praises CIRM Appeals Change
A stem cell researcher at UC Davis today said a change in the CIRM grant appeals procedure makes “a lot of sense.” Writing on his blog in regard to "extraordinary petitions," Paul Knoepfler said, “I think the proposed change makes a lot of sense and would greatly improve the process. Sometimes the reasons in the petitions are clearly not meritorious and as it now stands, they end up wasting CIRM's time. The last time CIRM received 9 petitions as well, which represented a remarkably large fraction of the total applications. A stricter process would discourage the submission of large numbers of petitions, an important issue given that the number of petitions received by CIRM continues to grow.”

CIRM Finally Discloses Grant Appeal Proposals
The California stem cell agency early today belatedly posted a two-page memo on proposed changes in how it will deal with appeals by scientists whose grant applications have been rejected by reviewers.

July 18, 2010
Sticky, Troubling Appeals by Rejected Researchers Targeted by Stem Cell Agency
A key step in the process for awarding billions of dollars in research grants is “broken,” according to many directors of the California stem cell agency, and major changes are looming that will affect hundreds of scientists.

June 22, 2010
Immunology Grants: CIRM Gives $25 Million to 19 Researchers
Directors of the California stem cell agency today approved $25 million for immunology research, overturning four negative decisions by its grant reviewers. Directors faced a record nine public petitions to reverse its reviewers. After some grumbling, the directors, who see only a summary of the application and reviewer comments, okayed the four.

June 19, 2010
More Grant Appeals Filed: Yamanaka Invoked
The California stem cell agency has set another benchmark, although this is one that it may not want to trot out at international stem cell gatherings. Eight scientists whose applications were rejected for funding by the CIRM grants working group and scientific reviewers are seeking to overturn those decisions at the agency's board meeting in San Diego on Tuesday. It is the largest number of “extraordinary petitions” ever filed and amounts to more than one out of every four applications that were turned down. The total number of applications received was 44. Fifteen were approved. Some of the researchers are likely to appear at the board meeting and make a personal pitch.

May 18, 2010
Competing for California Stem Cell Cash: Rules of the Game Coming Under Scrutiny
Every California stem cell scientist and researcher looking to join the field – be they from academia or business – should pay very close attention to a meeting next week of a key group of directors of the $3 billion California stem cell agency. They plan to discuss possible changes in how scientists compete for stem cell cash, which is no small matter since CIRM has another $2 billion to hand out over the next several years.

CIRM documents

Pre-application review – CIRM report (Jan. 2010) on the process

Extraordinary petition policy – Version as of 5/25/10

Appeal policy – Version as of 5/25/2010

Transcript of July 20, 2010, meeting of CIRM directors Science Subcommittee. Discussion of petitions begins on page 40.

Transcript of the June 22, 2010, CIRM directors meeting. Discussions of extraordinary petitions begin on pages 24 and 67.

Transcript of 5/25/10 Science Subcommittee meeting dealing with appeals issue. Discussion begins on page 99.

Source:
http://californiastemcellreport.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Posted in Stem Cell Therapy | Comments Off on CSCR Reading List: A Look at the Grant Appeal Process at the California Stem Cell Agency

$70 Million Research Proposal Up Next Week at California Stem Cell Agency


Directors of the $3 billion California
stem cell agency will hold a special, teleconference meeting next
Tuesday to deal with business that was put off last month, including
a new, $70 million research round.
The meeting is necessary because directors could not finish their business July 26 after they lost the supermajority quorum required to do business. They delayed action on a number of
matters, including the translational research proposal, which is
scheduled to be posted as an RFA next month.
The governing board also had discussed
dealing with changes in its intellectual property rules at next week's meeting, but that proposal is not on Tuesday's agenda. The next meeting of the board is Sept. 5 and 6 in San Francisco. The
agency has confirmed that it will be a two-day session.
At least one new appeal is expected to
come up in September in the $243 million disease team round that
consumed so much time in July.
Next week meeting involves a host of
locations throughout California. The public is entitled to
participate in the session from any of those sites. The specific
addresses can be found on the agenda.

Source:
http://californiastemcellreport.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Posted in Stem Cell Therapy | Comments Off on $70 Million Research Proposal Up Next Week at California Stem Cell Agency

Researcher Alert: Opportunity for Fresh Appeal in $243 Million Disease Team Round


A tiny opening exists for scientists
who failed to win approval last month of their bids for $20 million
research awards from the California stem cell agency.

On July 26, the agency's governing
board okayed $151 million for eight scientists during a day filled
with emotional testimony from patients, as well as appeals by
researchers seeking reconsideration of rejection by grant reviewers
at the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine. The board also
asked reviewers to take a fresh look at five applications in its signature disease team round.
However, the board failed to act on
eight applications, meaning that they are still pending. Normally the
board will approve -- as a group -- one set of applications. Then, at
the same meeting, it will vote to reject another set of applications.
On July 26, however, the hard-pressed directors late in the
afternoon lost the supermajority quorum (65 percent) required to do
business and adjourned without acting on all the applications.
This situation rarely occurs on award
rounds. In our recollection, it has happened only once before
although there may have been other occasions.
That leaves an opening for more
researchers to ask the board to act favorably at its Sept. 5-6 meeting in San Francisco on applications rejected by reviewers. Money
is available. The July 26 round was budgeted for $243 million.
At the meeting last month, discussion
by directors provided several clues to appropriate avenues for
reconsideration. They were interested in appeals, formally called
extraordinary petitions, that brought genuinely new information to
the table. Serious errors in the reviews – something more than
differences of opinion – were of interest. Wide variance in the
spread of scientific scores on specific applications, including the
preliminary scores, also triggered directors' interest.
Researchers considering appeals would
be well-advised to listen to the audiocast of the meeting to hear the
discussion of appeals. The transcript of the meeting also should be
posted soon on the CIRM website, probably this week. The transcript
can be found via this page when it is posted. The audiocast
instructions can be found on the July 26 meeting agenda.
(The best available information on the
CIRM web site shows a Sept. 5-6 governing board meeting. However,
that schedule also shows other two day meetings earlier this year,
which actually have turned out to be only one day.)

Source:
http://californiastemcellreport.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Posted in Stem Cell Therapy, Stem Cells | Comments Off on Researcher Alert: Opportunity for Fresh Appeal in $243 Million Disease Team Round

Researcher Alert: Opportunity for Fresh Appeal in $243 Million Disease Team Round


A tiny opening exists for scientists
who failed to win approval last month of their bids for $20 million
research awards from the California stem cell agency.

On July 26, the agency's governing
board okayed $151 million for eight scientists during a day filled
with emotional testimony from patients, as well as appeals by
researchers seeking reconsideration of rejection by grant reviewers
at the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine. The board also
asked reviewers to take a fresh look at five applications in its signature disease team round.
However, the board failed to act on
eight applications, meaning that they are still pending. Normally the
board will approve -- as a group -- one set of applications. Then, at
the same meeting, it will vote to reject another set of applications.
On July 26, however, the hard-pressed directors late in the
afternoon lost the supermajority quorum (65 percent) required to do
business and adjourned without acting on all the applications.
This situation rarely occurs on award
rounds. In our recollection, it has happened only once before
although there may have been other occasions.
That leaves an opening for more
researchers to ask the board to act favorably at its Sept. 5-6 meeting in San Francisco on applications rejected by reviewers. Money
is available. The July 26 round was budgeted for $243 million.
At the meeting last month, discussion
by directors provided several clues to appropriate avenues for
reconsideration. They were interested in appeals, formally called
extraordinary petitions, that brought genuinely new information to
the table. Serious errors in the reviews – something more than
differences of opinion – were of interest. Wide variance in the
spread of scientific scores on specific applications, including the
preliminary scores, also triggered directors' interest.
Researchers considering appeals would
be well-advised to listen to the audiocast of the meeting to hear the
discussion of appeals. The transcript of the meeting also should be
posted soon on the CIRM website, probably this week. The transcript
can be found via this page when it is posted. The audiocast
instructions can be found on the July 26 meeting agenda.
(The best available information on the
CIRM web site shows a Sept. 5-6 governing board meeting. However,
that schedule also shows other two day meetings earlier this year,
which actually have turned out to be only one day.)

Source:
http://californiastemcellreport.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Posted in Stem Cell Therapy | Comments Off on Researcher Alert: Opportunity for Fresh Appeal in $243 Million Disease Team Round

Stem cells may prevent post-injury arthritis

Public release date: 10-Aug-2012 [ | E-mail | Share ]

Contact: Mary Jane Gore mary.gore@duke.edu 919-660-1309 Duke University Medical Center

DURHAM, N.C.-- Duke researchers may have found a promising stem cell therapy for preventing osteoarthritis after a joint injury.

Injuring a joint greatly raises the odds of getting a form of osteoarthritis called post-traumatic arthritis, or PTA. There are no therapies yet that modify or slow the progression of arthritis after injury.

Researchers at Duke University Health System have found a very promising therapeutic approach to PTA using a type of stem cell, called mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), in mice with fractures that typically would lead to them developing arthritis. Their findings could lead to a therapy that would be used after joint injury and before signs of significant osteoarthritis.

The scientists thought the stem cells would work to prevent PTA by altering the balance of inflammation and regeneration in knee joints, because these stem cells have beneficial properties in other regions of the body.

"The stem cells were able to prevent post-traumatic arthritis," said Farshid Guilak, Ph.D., director of orthopaedic research at Duke and senior author of the study.

The study was published on August 10 in Cell Transplantation.

The researchers also thought that a type of mice bred for their super-healing properties would probably fare better than typical mice, but they were wrong.

"We decided to investigate two therapies for the study, said lead author Brian Diekman, Ph.D., a postdoctoral researcher in the Guilak lab. "We thought that stem cells from so-called superhealer mice would be superior at providing protection, and instead, we found that they were no better than stem cells from typical mice. We thought that maybe it would take stem cells from superhealers to gain an effect as strong as preventing arthritis after a fracture, but we were surprised and excited to learn that regular stem cells work just as well."

See the original post:
Stem cells may prevent post-injury arthritis

Posted in Stem Cell Therapy | Comments Off on Stem cells may prevent post-injury arthritis

Aaron Curry using stem cell therapy to help knees

AP

Raiders linebacker Aaron Curry isnt sure when hell be able to get back on the field, but hes pretty sure that stem cell therapy will be the thing that winds up getting him back there.

Paul Gutierrez of CSNBayArea.com reports that Curry has received the therapy on both of his knees. Bone marrow from his hips was used in the treatment and Curry told Gutierrez that it is the only thing hes tried that has helped him feel better. Curry is still working out on the side during Raiders practices and said hell only return to practice when hes fully able to help the Raiders.

My goal is to get healthy and just go out there and be violent, be fast, be a pain in the offenses butt and whatever I have to do on the defense, do it, Curry said. And do it full speed. I cant do that until my body says its ready.

The treatment has been popular with Oakland athletes. Linebacker Rolando McClain said that the treatment helped his legs feel better earlier this offseason and As pitcher Bartolo Colon has credited stem cell treatment on his shoulder with saving his baseball career.

With McClain facing a possible suspension under the Personal Conduct Policy and Oakland short on linebacking depth, the Raiders need Curry to be healthy for the start of the season.

Visit link:
Aaron Curry using stem cell therapy to help knees

Posted in Stem Cell Therapy | Comments Off on Aaron Curry using stem cell therapy to help knees